PubliusInfinitum
Rookie
- Aug 18, 2008
- 6,805
- 729
- 0
- Banned
- #41
Publius Infinitum said:Now, let's look at the whole Leftist argument for "National Healthcare"...
The entire argument is founded upon WHAT?
It is founded upon the premise that the US has people who aren't insured... which is true. But what is NOT true is that those people have chosen to BE INSURED and could not manage to do so... AND that not being insured equates to NO ACCESS TO MEDICAL TREATMENT. Or the most common, that those insured are denied medical care by uncaring bureaucrats...
It's a lie... and what’s more, when you look at the above rationalization you find that the ADVOCATES for National Healthcare are returning to inform you that there will be instances where those 'insured' by national healthcare, will inevitably come to a point where circumstances simply do not provide for medical treatment... and that these instances are based upon 'good reasons'... the reasons of the 'realist'...
Of course, the 'uncaring bureaucrats' that this ENTIRE FIASCO is designed to eliminate, also have 'good reasons' to deny coverage... but the Leftist is telling you that THEIR reasons are morally sound, because their REASONS are founded in the BEST INTEREST OF THE PEOPLE... and not the distasteful interests of the "OTHER PEOPLE."
Here are the facts: The US healthcare system costs more because it treats more... it's not perfect, but it is SUPERIOR... and where you decide to concede your RESPONSIBILITY, you CONCEDE THE RIGHT WHICH THAT RESPONSIBILITY SUSTAINS...
Turn from these liars and reject their looming tyranny.
One US citizens View on Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness; In the context of The Healthcare Debate.
Life- The Inalienable human right to live. All those who live, seek health, for they {are} inseparable and interdependent.
Liberty- The inalienable right to freedom. While no person has the right to live shamelessly, the heavy, solid, chains of debt should not be incurred for the simple act of living and seeking health.
The Pursuit of Happiness- Happiness becomes impossible to obtain in a system where both life and liberty are held ransom. It becomes both the duty of the citizen and his duly elected government to right the system and but both back in the hands of The People.
ROFLMNAO...
Let's take that drivel one point at a time...
#1: Life- The Inalienable human right to live. All those who live, seek health, for they {are} inseparable and interdependent.
Notice however that the Leftists, who comes to the board presenting herself as a Moderate... 'main streamer;' makes NO MENTION of any RESPONSIBILITY which comes with what she 'feels' represents the Human RIGHT that stands as the basis for the Anti-American "National Healthcare." Below we'll see where that becomes problematic.
#2: Liberty- The inalienable right to freedom. While no person has the right to live shamelessly; the heavy, solid, chains of debt should not be incurred for the simple act of living and seeking health.
Well Liberty IS freedom... but we'll set that semantic point aside for the moment. There is no actual correlation between her stated premise: "While no person has the right to live shamelessly;" and the conclusion she draws from that premise: "the heavy, solid, chains of debt should not be incurred for the simple act of living and seeking health."
One presumes she meant "seeking healthcare"
First, the RESPONSIBILITY intrinsic in the RIGHT to pursue the fulfillment of one's life, is to live shamelessly... SO it is true that 'it is not a RIGHT to live shamelessly;' it is the duty which comes with the RIGHT TO LIVE, to live without shame; as shame is a function of dishonor, emoting humiliation.
Secondly,in the current US system, no one is FORCING you to incur debt to seek healthcare; those that DO, do so of their own free will...
Now where National Healthcare comes to pass; the individual citizen IS FORCED TO INCUR DEBT; AS A RESULT OF FEDERAL HEALTHCARE SUBSIDIES; the debt is of course a function of the government spending money which obligates the citizen.
THERE IS NO RIGHT TO FORCE ANOTHER TO INCUR DEBT TO SUBSIDIZE YOUR HEALTHCARE! PERIOD! And this is because YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO INFRINGE UPON THE LIBERTY, THE FREEDOM AND THE VALID AND SUSTAINABLE RIGHTS OF ANOTHER...
Ergo; National Healthcare is a violation of the divine unalienable human rights of which every human being endowed and of which the rights which EVERY American enjoys the protections from such.
And finally...
#3:The Pursuit of Happiness- Happiness becomes impossible to obtain in a system where both life and liberty are held ransom. It becomes both the duty of the citizen and his duly elected government to right the system and but both back in the hands of The People.
There is no one holding Life and Liberty for ransom in the present US HC System... The assertion is absurd on its face. the Right to life does not guarantee LIFE... it gaurantees that where Life is endowed, it is the RIGHT of the endowed to PURSUE THE FULFILLMENT OF THAT LIFE. If you feel that healthcare is inherent in such pursuits... you are ENTITLED TO SECURE SUCH, to the extent of YOUR MEANS!
You decidedly DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO FORCE OTHERS INTO DEBT TO SUBSIDIZE YOUR HEALTHCARE, or any other facet of YOUR INDIVIDUAL LIFE.
The simple FACT IS: Valid and Sustainable Human Rights come with intrinsic RESPONSBILITY; as it is the RESPONSIBILITY which SUSTAINS THAT RIGHT... where an individual concedes the RESPONSIBILITY FOR LIFE, they concede the RIGHT TO LIFE...
To which we, THE AMERICANS, UNANIMOUSLY REPLY:
SHOVE OFF and take your communist bullshit with ya...
We'll retain OUR RESPONSIBILITY WHICH SECURE OUR RIGHTS and we aren't likely to let you and the other feminized leftist FUCKS strip us of our Rights, so you can 'feel better more secure...'
Last edited: