Oregon Tax Rich Vote Counters Massachusetts For Bush Vote!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mascale, Jan 27, 2010.

  1. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    So as special elections go, as opposed to the (beauty) contest in Massachusetts, the voters in Oregon went genuine Populist and voted for the more Socialist, pro-public services, pro-education, pro-pay-as-you-go kind of agenda--as opposed to the FOXTV-Fantasize-As-You-Go agenda. The rich will be asked to pay their fair-share of the state's pro-humanity agenda.

    Tax measures pass - Portland Business Journal:

    Business is clearly wrong, and bad!

    Now there is compare and contrast in the elections of January. Like the fellow elected in Massachusetts, Bush was of the National Guard, or at least asleep and/or AWOL about it. Bush failed completely to understand the role of intelligence-gathering, the advance-scouts in the field, and even failed completely, to find out really--if anyone was paying any taxes in the first place! And then there was the Vice-President choice, of Cheney!

    In contrast, The Democrats know that millions now have no income-tax liability at all, and so cutting taxes to stimulate the economy is not even near to the simplicity that the clearly mis-guided, Massachusetts Senator-Elect was touting. The Massachusetts Senator-Elect was actually supporting what Bush did. The concept was to lie to Massachusetts, just like Reagan--the "budget-balancing," promiser: That all persons with earned incomes in America have a federal income tax liablity. The Senator-Elect had another, Fantasize-As-You-Go role model. Both the Senator-Elect and Ronald Reagan would make their promises, over-and-over-and-over-and-over again! FOXTV is in fact a lot like them!

    And so Oregon put the brakes on any semblance of a FOXTV revival in America. The People of Oregon will actually pay for what they get, as opposed to the liars who refused to do that, big-time, again-and-again! In fact, the Real Populists, would be said, apparently, the Populist, Democratic Party leaning, pro-government activist, promise-keepers of the United States.

    Then there are the others!

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Great Half-Wit Father in Washington: Know About Others(?)!)
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2010
  2. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,850
    Thanks Received:
    4,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,568
    Wow... let's see how that works for Oregon.

    Prediction - all that will remain will be the usual cast of leaches and anarchists.
     
  3. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,850
    Thanks Received:
    4,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,568
    Funny... you probably don't realize this, but this statement alone counters half of what you are espousing.
     
  4. Oldandtired
    Offline

    Oldandtired BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,618
    Thanks Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Long Island
    Ratings:
    +349
    Why is it that "tax cuts" to those that create jobs is always spun as tax cuts to the rich.
    Look around us...people like to start new business...AND LIKE TO GROW THEM.
    WHy is there any argument that putting more money in the pockets of those that like to grow their business is nothing more than making it easier for the rich?

    The spin of basic logic...and the continued spewing of such spin is disturbing.

    quite simple...taking from those that need money to create jobs and giving it to those that do not create jobs will NOT create jobs.

    When those that do NOT create jobs get that money, they will buy what is most cost effective for them...and with the increase on taxes to those that DO create jobs, their products and services willbe less cost competative than those imported.

    Prove me wrong...and not with some link to an MSNBC blog.
     
  5. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,850
    Thanks Received:
    4,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,568
    Nothing says 'grow the economy" like sending a welfare recipient/progressive/liberal $600!!!!!!
     
  6. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    When any business puts money into costs--that tend to increase the business--then no income taxes are levied on that money. To avoid the taxes, the business creates the expansionary costs. Presumably the business increases output: And so how does that get purchased.

    When people who need to buy things, actually have the money: Then the business that makes things has a market to sell. One way to provide the money is with the tax cut to the likely spenders. Since that has been doing on since the 1986 U. S. Federal Income Tax reform, then people with no further liability for U. S. Federal Income Taxes any more need a refundable credit.

    "quite simple...taking from those that need money to create jobs and giving it to those that do not create jobs will NOT create jobs."

    That doesn't happen with a tax increase. See Accountant(?)!

    "When those that do NOT create jobs get that money, they will buy what is most cost effective for them"

    "Aha! Said the blind man, who picked up his hammer and saw(?)!'

    Little kids know this stuff!

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Great Half-Wit Father In Washington: Get many squaws! Make Bigger Garden! Even Make Sense(?)!)
     
  7. Mr. Peepers
    Offline

    Mr. Peepers Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    3,206
    Thanks Received:
    394
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +394
    Because they didn't create any jobs! In fact, the opposite happened. This country hemhorraged jobs the past decade like it had hemophilia.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2010
  8. Oldandtired
    Offline

    Oldandtired BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,618
    Thanks Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Long Island
    Ratings:
    +349
    You took a simple "post" and disected it.
    I could have...and I guess for people like you...should have gone into things syuch as statatorry costs of employees......costs of payroll, etc.....but I never thought someone would disect a simple explanation.

    Either you dont want to get it or you simply wanted to show how much you know even though it is not applicable...

    Whatever it is, nice try...but as a business owner, I can tell you one thing....you make business decisions based on what "the book" tells you, you will go out of business.
     
  9. TheSuaveOne
    Offline

    TheSuaveOne Man without a party

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Messages:
    617
    Thanks Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +61
    LOL, that's a hoot.

    First off, "fair share"? Really? Finally, "asked"? Try "stolen from".

    -TSO
     
  10. Luissa
    Offline

    Luissa Annoying Customer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    43,190
    Thanks Received:
    5,593
    Trophy Points:
    1,785
    Location:
    TARDIS
    Ratings:
    +5,664
    YOu are a total moron, and partisan hack!:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page