Discussion in 'History' started by PoliticalChic, Sep 6, 2018.
Proving, once again, that we can only judge others by ourselves.
There should be a law that once one supports a political party they cannot change without permission of the political party. It's these people that think they can change parties anytime they want that cause problems.
Uh ... no.
Hell no if there ever comes into being a competitive truly Conservative Party I'm jumping ship. Todays Republicans are only marginally better than the very rare center Democrats.
So which political party, Democratic or Republican will be the first to elect a black president?
Well, one 'Fun Fact' was it was a Republican President who expanded the Civil Rights Acts to include the rest of the country when they began coming up for reviews after his election win in '68, the original laws only being applied selectively to a few southern states, the only way to get northern Democratic support for the legislation in '64-'65, and it was Nixon who pandered shamelessly to the radical Back Caucus and gave them the 'War On Drugs' they demanded, did away with the literacy tests in New York and California along with some 16 other northern states, black Harlem voted in percentages comparable to Mississippi until that change, and then he also gave them their Quota system to replace Affirmative Action that genuine Liberals like Moynihan and others fought tooth and nail to prevent during LBJ's last term, though they kept calling it 'AA' in hopes of deceiving the stupid.
All of Moynihan's predictions of what that would quotas would do have come true in spades, by the way, with school administrators now being exempted from having to provide real education equal to the white schools, just for one instance of destruction of standards as high for black education as they were for everybody else, they could just cry 'racism n stuff!' now and expand that stupid lie to just about everything now, and they do; the black 'middle class' created to serve black ghetto communities merely hold them hostages and just using their' bruthas' to threaten violence as a means to increase their own bennies and special treatment.
And then there was the forced busing issues, since the Northern stares had school systems just as segregated and in some liberal states like the Kennedy's Massachusetts even more segregated, and ever since the race riots in Liberal Democratic states have been the most violent and frequent, so if that was a 'Southern Strategy' it will be news to anyone who knows the real history, since it did little for the South, and angered most of the 'NIMBY liberals' in nice rich white enclaves in all those 'enlightened' states. We did get great laughs out of WP owner Graham and Califano, who spent a decade fanning the flames of racism and exhorting the mobs to violence with all thet other 'radicals', and then turn around and run sniveling to Nixon to declare martial law in D.C. When the riots hit their backyards, though.
After Nixon gave the radicals all they wanted , the riots moved to northern and western liberal states, where most rioting remains, NYC not long ago had a race riot over Jews having their own ambulance services rather than rely on NYC's, after all. LA goes up in flames every time some shit head doper criminal wins a Darwin Award, ditto Baltimore, and so on.
But we know it's just a fake revisionism scam from Democrats, trying to smear the GOP while whitewashing their own miserable record and lie to school kids and dumbass college seat warmers, much like their big campaign against 'slavery n stuff', 170 years after the fact, hoping to fool idiots.
Anybody wants a more complete record and heavily sourced study of the Civil Rights Era can find Hugh Davis Graham's excellent book on the subject.
Probably Republicans. Democrats only want 'minorities' around for window dressing. Obama wasn't black, and nobody wants black Democrats in the White House, since all the Democrats offer is Maxine Waters, Al Sharpton, and other racists and con artists, while the GOP offers fine educated men who are black, surgeons and large business founders, people like that.
What is the explanation for your fascination with skin color over acumen????
Didn't the abject failure of the first 'black' President teach you anything?
BTW..... What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
C'mon....try to answer.
Arming crazed Mullahs with nukes is just something we're supposed to be all for since some Democrats did it.
Especially if he's black.....
Separate names with a comma.