Old jerk acts like an ass and gets just what he deserves

Just a sample of the answer that republicans have in store for askers of uncomfortable questions. How does he plan to kill programs that many of us have paid into all our lives? Bet he had no answer that would satisfy anyone interested in the question.

Wel he doesnt plan to kill those programs. On the contrary, he plans to save them. That's the whole point. It is Democrats that will kill them by bankrupting the country.

As for the old kraut, he got what he deserved. The Left has a lock on incivility bordering on insanity.

Like "We had to destroy the village in order to save it"....that kind of save, eh?

Not at all.

It is opening ones eyes to the fact that the system as it is currently set up is not working properly...so making the necessary adjujstments to enable the system to work. It may not be as GOOD a system from an entiotlement standpoint...but a "not so good" working system is always better than a "better" non working system.

Do you have a better idea?

Heck...what is Obamas idea?
 
Turning it to a voucher program, is not keeping the program. It's changing it to something completely different.

Kind of like changing the definition of marraige to include poofters changes marriage to something completely different?

No, geek, not at all. Marriage in the eyes of the Law is about its tax implications, its a legal status which doesn't need "Sex" of the participants involved at all. It's an irrelevant non factor except in the eyes of the folks who think that because society has legal gay marriages, they can't take responsibility and effectively still teach their own morals to their own kids.

So, you can fundamentally alter the definition of marriage without changing, but not the way an entitlement program works. Got it.
 
Kind of like changing the definition of marraige to include poofters changes marriage to something completely different?

No, geek, not at all. Marriage in the eyes of the Law is about its tax implications, its a legal status which doesn't need "Sex" of the participants involved at all. It's an irrelevant non factor except in the eyes of the folks who think that because society has legal gay marriages, they can't take responsibility and effectively still teach their own morals to their own kids.

So, you can fundamentally alter the definition of marriage without changing, but not the way an entitlement program works. Got it.

I didnt say that you cant change the program (entitlement? we pay into it).

I said that it's not the same program. My comments on whether or not I agree with changes etc. are reserved for when I have hours on end to study it for myself, not let the media tell me what it is anjd isn't.

But the voucher thing, and how I learned of it? Ryan's own bullet points.




I also disagree that Marriage's definition in the eyes of the Law would be fundamentally altered.
 
Here are some more old people concerned about Medicare:

Ryan Heckled At First Solo Event

Sounds like the oldsters are going to revolt!

only because they have people lying to them about the Ryan plan.

I blame the liars.

Lying doesnt get us anywhere.
The Congressional Budget Office projects that Ryan’s plan would raise seniors’ out-of-pocket expenses by $6,500 per year.

The Difference Between Barack Obama And Paul Ryan’s Medicare Plans | TPMDC

That's a hell of a lot of money for anyone in the middle class or below but most especially for those on a fixed income.
 

I love stupid monkeys like you and the jack ass thinking you can do whatever you want with out consequences. First there is a lawful way to voice opposition and that wasn't it.

Second, how many FUCKING times do we have to explain to liberal DOUCHE BAGS that any of Ryan's plans do not effect the current crop of seniors from SS to medicare! Do you collection fuckhead just not listen or too big of assholes that you rather slander a good man instead of facing the truth?

Third, the budget is getting busted primarily by 4 items. Medicare and Medicaid (which are the largest), SS (which is second), defense budget (3rd) and other entitlements or the so-called safety net (4th). Most honest conservatives will agree defense needs to be cut down. HOWEVER, without things being don't to SS and MC/MC and other entitlement cutting defense won't do a thing! Liberal douche bags demagogue and outright LIE when anyone talks about SS, MC/MC or other entitlement reform or even about the need to reform them. Yet as a country we are going further and further in debt. At some point, which is very close, we will go the way of Greece, Italy, Spain, Portogul etc, but we won't have the EU to bail us out and China isn't going to do it!
 
Second, how many FUCKING times do we have to explain to liberal DOUCHE BAGS
Why would anyone believe something that came out of Romney/Ryan's mouth when the guy won't even release his tax forms? There is no honestly there, bub.
 
changing it to something completely different is modification? oh, alright then.

Keeping it the way it is without modification does what?

Time to show you are smarter then your brethren...........

This ^

is an obfuscation from what my point actually was - was that he's changing the whole fucking thing while saying he isn't.

Ok, I will go with change............... over time.

Now give me the democrat alternative so I can compare............
 
Keeping it the way it is without modification does what?

Time to show you are smarter then your brethren...........

This ^

is an obfuscation from what my point actually was - was that he's changing the whole fucking thing while saying he isn't.

Ok, I will go with change............... over time.

Now give me the democrat alternative so I can compare............

The Health Care Law & You | HealthCare.gov

I'm sure you'll study hard before commenting.
 
Here are some more old people concerned about Medicare:

Ryan Heckled At First Solo Event

Sounds like the oldsters are going to revolt!

only because they have people lying to them about the Ryan plan.

I blame the liars.

Lying doesnt get us anywhere.
The Congressional Budget Office projects that Ryan’s plan would raise seniors’ out-of-pocket expenses by $6,500 per year.

The Difference Between Barack Obama And Paul Ryan’s Medicare Plans | TPMDC

That's a hell of a lot of money for anyone in the middle class or below but most especially for those on a fixed income.

Thanks for the article...but I suggest you read it.
The following are three excerpts from it...my comments in red..

The Medicare cuts, passed in the Affordable Care Act, come in the form of reimbursement reductions to hospitals, Medicaid prescription drugs and supplemental private insurance plans under Medicare Advantage. The Congressional Budget Office projects that they’ll extend the solvency of Medicare by eight years.

Extending it 8 years is a short term solution and gets us nowhere. Likewise, it includes the slashing of payments to helathcare providers....and when a hospital starts getting smaller reimbursements, they will be turning to the government to supplement their revenue...so in the end, it will be no net gain.

Obama’s long-term plan to save Medicare, approved under the Affordable Care Act, is to set up a panel of 15 Senate-confirmed experts tasked with issuing proposals to rein in the growth of spending if it exceeds a certain level. The Independent Payment Advisory Board, or IPAB, may only propose cuts to providers, not beneficiaries. Congress may replace the cuts by passing its own or with a three-fifths super-majority.

Interesting...but do you not notice there is no mention of HOW these experts will will rein in spending if it exceeds a certain level...nor does it specify the "certain level"...so it is an idea...not a set plan....an idea set into law with no specifics.

The Congressional Budget Office projects that Ryan’s plan would raise seniors’ out-of-pocket expenses by $6,500 per year.

No one doubts that the Ryan plan will end up costing the seniors.....but with all those over 55 granbdfathered in...it will give all those under 55 time to prepare. It will be toughest for folks like me (I am 54) becuase we have the least amount of time to prepare.....but for the amjority....those not born yet through those that are 40 and younger...they will have plenty of time to prepare. Sadly...someone needs to take the hit...and its the 45-54 yerar olds.....
 

But, but, don't you understand?

Right-wing fanatics disrupting Democratic Town-Halls = Good

Old Guy disrupting Right-wing fanatic Town Hall = Bad

When the Tea Party sends in plants to scream and yell at town halls, that's obviously fair.

When some random old guy wants to scream and yell at a Ryan town hall, he should obviously be tackled, handcuffed and arrested...



WHAT? There's no hypocrisy in that statement!
 
only because they have people lying to them about the Ryan plan.

I blame the liars.

Lying doesnt get us anywhere.

So, when FoxNews was lying to people about the health care bill?

You feel that the Tea Partiers should have been arrested, right?

And that FoxNews should have been blamed. Right?

Oh, no, I forgot...

It's OK when they're on your side...
 
Second, how many FUCKING times do we have to explain to liberal DOUCHE BAGS
Why would anyone believe something that came out of Romney/Ryan's mouth when the guy won't even release his tax forms? There is no honestly there, bub.

Fair is fair. We don't believe anything that comes from obammy's mouth, being as the crook won't release the fast and furious documents, HIs college transcripts, or His passport history. There is no honesty there, sugartits. Of course, you helped elect Him , and will overlook His dishonesty. Why? Because you really could care less about dishonesty, as long as the lies are the right kind.


The individual mandate is not a tax, and the seas have stopped rising.
 
only because they have people lying to them about the Ryan plan.

I blame the liars.

Lying doesnt get us anywhere.

So, when FoxNews was lying to people about the health care bill?

You feel that the Tea Partiers should have been arrested, right?

And that FoxNews should have been blamed. Right?

Oh, no, I forgot...

It's OK when they're on your side...

Back off. I never gave the thumbs up on trhis guy being arrested. To the contrary, my comment was more about how our politicians need to realize that their game of spin and lies may work for them, but it creates fear and panic in the people they serve.

As for the guy getting arrested....only a fool would think he was arrested for speaking out. My guess is he did something out of the room to the people escorting him out.

I personally resented the fact that he was escorted out. He had a right to be there and a right to speak his mind.
 

Forum List

Back
Top