Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
What do you mean?No, mine will reduce mass shootings with the REMOVAL of gun control.I have an even MORE effective solution that will also reduce the cost and not trample on the rights of those with mental illnesses.NEW DETAILS: Gov. DeWine outlines plan to tackle gun violence
I have to say I am mildly surprised by this - when I heard he had a plan for changes in Ohio's gun control laws, I figured we'd see a proposal for a red-flag law and universal background checks -- instead, he presented something I can support.
Good job, Mike!
DeWine caved. His plan sucks. The income tax was one of those laws that started out as "voluntary." Look at what it's become. There is something inherently wrong with any law that requires a background check in order to exercise a constitutional right.
I have the ONLY plan that would reduce mass shootings by 90 percent (and significantly reduce other types of shootings) without any new taxes, tax increases, bureaucracies or gun control.
People who have mental issues bad enough to prohibit them from owning weapons have no business running around unsupervised in our society. You catch them early, BEFORE they commit an act of violence and either rehabilitate them or keep them in a supervised environment.
Assume everyone is bat-shit crazy, and EVERYBODY with capacity to do so, takes up arms and is responsible for his/her own personal security instead of relying on the state to protect them.
Problem solved.
.
Not really helpful, but I do have the only solution that will reduce mass shootings without gun control.
.
How come everybody here is opposed to realistically addressing the dangers of gun control?
The main reason criminals use guns to commit crimes is because they believe they will be met with little or no resistance.
Remove all obstructions or restrictions to all firearms for everyone of legal capacity and force people to take responsibility for their own security.
If everyone is armed, no one has an advantage.
.