October Surprise: 2016

Discussion in 'Congress' started by Flanders, Apr 3, 2014.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,034
    Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann hammered former CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell at yesterday’s Intelligence Committee hearing as you’ll see in the video:

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnOnfHRwi5k&feature=player_embedded]Bachmann Challenges Former Acting CIA Director on Benghazi - YouTube[/ame]​

    Bachmann’s analysis of Morell’s testimony in an exclusive follow up interview with WND is even better:

    Morell verified something I knew way back at the height of the Cold War. Never let Democrats come anywhere near an intelligence agency. Today, they have control of the entire intelligence community. If you doubt me ask yourself where Mike Morell’s loyalty will reside if he ever does become CIA Director? Answer: Right now the Clintons owe him one, as CIA director he will owe the Clintons personal loyalty along with loyalty to their global agenda. No small thing when you’re talking about the CIA’s resources and expertise.

    Parenthetically, the CIA operates outside the US and away from the watchful eye of domestic intelligence agencies. A CIA director loyal to the Clintons ties in nicely with Jamie Gorelick’s Memo.

    My guess is that fewer than 10 people know who issued the order to the US military to stand down while the attack in Benghazi was in progress. Neither Congress nor the media seem interested in learning who gave the order. Compiling a short list of suspects is the best the Internet can do. Hillary Clinton and Valerie Jarrett are neck and neck at the top of my list with Leon Panetta, and Martin Dempsey running a whisker behind the fillies.

    If truth be told, I lean toward Clinton because she losses the most; however, I don’t want to see any congressional committee proving it until after she hopefully gets her party’s nomination in 2016. I know it’s a gamble because nothing sticks to that woman. She’s the only person I know of where the worst lies you can say about her improves her image.

    If then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did issue the order to stand down that might be the one that finally resonates with voters if Congress releases the proof at the right time. There is a better chance of that happening after Democrats lose the Senate. Impaneling a select committee would be foolish while Harry Reid runs the Senate. Impartial, bipartisan, truth, mean nothing to that man.

    Finally, remember that al-Qaeda’s attack in Benghazi frightened Democrats into executing the dumbest, most inept, cover up imaginable 6 weeks before the presidential election in 2012. How stupid was the Administration to send Suzy Five Shows out there to say things that a 10 year old could disprove in a minute? Sad to say it worked because Barack Taqiyya got a second term. Nevertheless, just think how terrified Hillary’s people must be of a 2016 October Surprise that nails her for issuing the stand down order. No cover up will work on that one. No media whitewash, or blackout, will give her a first term.
     
  2. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,034
  3. HenryBHough
    Offline

    HenryBHough Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    23,503
    Thanks Received:
    4,013
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Oak Grove, Massachusetts
    Ratings:
    +12,920
    "Democrat" and "intelligence" should never be used in the same sentence.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,034
  5. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,034
    So why is anybody surprised?

     
  6. whitehall
    Offline

    whitehall Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    32,212
    Thanks Received:
    5,321
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +16,038
    The CIA hasn't been on top of an issue since WW2. The agency is not only redundant but it has become a political arm of the democrat party.
     
  7. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,034
    To whitehall: I think the CIA was effective throughout the Cold War. It began to come under the control of Democrats after the Soviet Union imploded thanks to Bill Clinton.

    Putting all of the country’s security eggs in one basket after 9-11-2001 gave Democrats the absolute control they were after for decades.

    Parenthetically, the CIA is a casualty of J. Edgar Hoover’s long-running battle against American Communists. The creation of the Department of Homeland Security, and appointing a Director of National Intelligence, eliminated the possibility of another Hoover keeping Democrat traitors in line. That, in turn, diminished the CIA’s ability to defend this country in foreign lands when CIA activities might harm Democrat policies.
     
  8. mamooth
    Offline

    mamooth Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2012
    Messages:
    17,781
    Thanks Received:
    3,100
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Ratings:
    +10,636
    Dang, I didn't realize this was the conspiracy forum.
     
  9. william the wie
    Offline

    william the wie Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    9,344
    Thanks Received:
    924
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,000
    This will be small potatoes by 2016. What will be big news in 2016 is:

    Jobless economic growth partly due to Ocare, partly due to new EPA regs and partly due to automation but mostly due to China, Brazil, Russia and India hitting various walls to further growth.

    Technological innovation started having less real economic impact in the 90s: R&D costs increasing and defending patents and other IP getting a lot more expensive are the main culprits.

    The returns on higher education started turning negative in the 1970s. This is mostly due to ever shorter product life cycles.

    Hillary either won't run or get her butt beat but Benghazi will not be a major factor in 2016.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Bush92
    Offline

    Bush92 GHBush1992

    Joined:
    May 23, 2014
    Messages:
    13,992
    Thanks Received:
    1,909
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +10,216
    Oh yes, the Socialist Party (Democratic) has been trying to take over the CIA and military for a long time. A threat to our internal security. Watch out all you American's with your Christian beliefs, traditional values, faith in Constitutional rights...Uncle Sam is coming to get you.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
2016 october surprise
,
cia terrifed october
,

october surprise 2016