Obama's union pal Andy Stern praises Communist China

[PoliticalChic]

Your team sold out asses to china

Chinagate:
Attempts were made by Communist China to funnel money to the Clinton campaign and influence elections in 1996. Charlie Trie, one of Bills trusted DNC fundraisers, attempted to funnel this money. When faced with indictment he fled to China for refuge. Another money funneler for the communists and Clinton campaign, Johnny Chung, is now in jail. The funds came from divisions of the Chinese army, one of which had been caught only months earlier while attempting to smuggle AK-47's to LA street gangs. This is the government of RED CHINA - definitely a serious matter. If any scandals do catch up with him, which probably will happen, this is by far the worst. Amidst the sex scandals another DNC fundraiser scandal, Johnny Chung, openly admitted to knowingly taking funds from the Chinese government. Chung also testified that the DNC knew the source of this money was communist China. They accepted it anyway. The money is said to have been funneled through Chinese government official Liu Chao-ying then Chung and then to the DNC. Even more revealing was that Liu Chao-ying, daughter of Liu Hauqing (recent head of the Chinese military and top official of the Chinese communist party) and a Peoples Liberation Army and Chinese space agency official, attended a DNC fundraiser. Here she was photographed with Clinton. Chung also visited the White House over 45 times. Chung took several thousand dollars from commies and contributed them to a partisan candidate for President of the United States and leader of the free world. Chung was only a powerful campaign contributer/supporter with ties to the DNC and White House. Johnny Chung testified under oath to Congress on his admitted relations with the Chinese Commies and the ties to the President. Ironically Chung is one of a very small number of people who had greater White House access than Monica Lewinsky! Chung is said to have made over 50 visits compared to Monica's 39! Even better, only a week later Charlie Trie entered a guilty plea for his fundraising crimes and agreed to talk with investigators! Who next? Well it happened to be John Huang! Huang, another Clinton cronie, pled guilty to funneling Chinese funds less than a week after Trie! Well, at least we know the commies endorse Bill Clinton for president.
The Clintongate Administration


Why do you make this so easy for me, Ms. Truthie?

 

[ScreamingEagle]

We'll see how well that actually works.

China has an interesting history. The country has gone through periods of division, chaos, and civil war followed by periods of order and strong central government over and over again. It emerged from the last period of chaos in 1949 and has had a strong central government for the past sixty-plus years. But the Chinese government is well aware that this is a precarious situation and of the centrifugal forces at work in China among its 55 ethnicities.

China was able to suppress the democracy movement years ago because it was confined to college students; most of the population still consisted of peasants who had no desire for democracy. But as the country industrializes and becomes more urban and better-educated, it will become increasingly impossible to keep the lid on. Change is inevitable.

As for banning terms on the Internet, unless China is ready to ban social media altogether that won't work.

China is still largely poor....despite the creation of many millionaires....there is a huge "floating population" of people from the poor rural areas into the cities who try desparately to find work...

The number of people living on less than $2/day is approximately 468 million, or 36% of the population, according to 2009 estimate.

and interestingly.....60% of the rich want to move out of China......mostly to the US and Canada....

Poverty in the People's Republic of China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sixty percent of China's rich want to leave the country | Credit Writedowns

 

[PoliticalChic]

How can a union leader be enamored with a culture that pays its workers whatever the hell they want? Is this what Jimmy Hoffa fought for? Similarly, how about the Lefties that praise China's econimics and ignores China's impact on the environment?

The union workers and environmentalists are simply pawns in what is a greater scheme to change the US from an open, capitalist society into a controlled economy and governemnt ruled by the elite where they get to decide what is "equitable for all" while the elite live high on the hog.

"Chinese leaders chose to achieve this strength—which is not the same as development—by exploiting the rural Chinese at the cheapest cost, sending them to work in urban factories producing goods for the global marketplace. This conflict between the new urban capitalism, flourishing with Party support, and the former rural capitalism, now languishing, has dug a social divide with no equivalent in other nations, rich or poor.

Growth of illiteracy rates in rural China—a direct legacy of the Party’s economic strategy. When one visits rural China, visual evidence upholds his findings: schools and health care, which could still be found, even if in limited forms, in the 1980s, have now all but disappeared.

Another important factor that does not show up in statistics: the Hukou identification system, which links any Chinese to his mother’s village of origin. In practice, this amounts to legal apartheid, allowing the urban employer to send back to his mother’s home the unproductive or restless worker."
China’s Dubious “Miracle” by Guy Sorman, City Journal 13 March 2009

 

[paulitician]

Communists in love with fellow Communists. It really is that simple in the end. Meanwhile his GE Bosses only get richer. Is his "Jobs Czar" GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt tagging along? Probably looking to Outsource a few more American jobs.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

How can a union leader be enamored with a culture that pays its workers whatever the hell they want? Is this what Jimmy Hoffa fought for? Similarly, how about the Lefties that praise China's econimics and ignores China's impact on the environment?

The union workers and environmentalists are simply pawns in what is a greater scheme to change the US from an open, capitalist society into a controlled economy and governemnt ruled by the elite where they get to decide what is "equitable for all" while the elite live high on the hog.

"Chinese leaders chose to achieve this strength—which is not the same as development—by exploiting the rural Chinese at the cheapest cost, sending them to work in urban factories producing goods for the global marketplace. This conflict between the new urban capitalism, flourishing with Party support, and the former rural capitalism, now languishing, has dug a social divide with no equivalent in other nations, rich or poor.

Growth of illiteracy rates in rural China—a direct legacy of the Party’s economic strategy. When one visits rural China, visual evidence upholds his findings: schools and health care, which could still be found, even if in limited forms, in the 1980s, have now all but disappeared.

Another important factor that does not show up in statistics: the Hukou identification system, which links any Chinese to his mother’s village of origin. In practice, this amounts to legal apartheid, allowing the urban employer to send back to his mother’s home the unproductive or restless worker."
China’s Dubious “Miracle” by Guy Sorman, City Journal 13 March 2009

thanks... your article really sums it up well as to what is really happening in Red China today.....the Party is not relinquishing its power....the existence of state-controlled capitalism does not necessarily equate to the creation of democracy....

“The fact that 45 percent of the Chinese live under the poverty line in spite of a double digit growth,” writes Huang, “shows that China has chosen the wrong path.” Huang may be right from an ethical perspective or from the rural Chinese perspective. But the strategy that Huang condemns fits perfectly with the ambition of the Party: a strong, educated, modern, and city-based China, served by an army of 1 billion workers who keep wages low and competitive.

Huang’s survey ends in 2007, but he does cover the latest power shift within the Party. The Shanghai clique has been forced into retirement and replaced by a seemingly more compassionate Communism: President Hu Jintao talks of social justice and a harmonious society. But beyond this rhetoric, which had nourished Huang’s hopes (at least initially), little of substance has changed. The Hukou system remains in place, cities continue to grow, and land still belongs to the state. Public investments in schools and health care in rural areas remain barely visible. Not only is democratization out, but repression has hardened.

 

[Navy1960]

This is just a humble opinion here, but as a nation we spend an awful lot of time complaining about China and unfairness rather than concentrating on such things as making this nation stronger. Personally I could care less what happens in China, other than the fact that prices might go up at the local Wal Mart tomorrow. We as a nation are very capable of being a strong producer of any product and service the rest of world does and more so do it better as well. The only problem we seem to have today is the willingness to do so and in some cases we have become so addicted to the cheap goods and services we are unable to to see that domestic production can do a better job.

 

[peach174]

Andy Stern is a communist and loves communism, just like Rosanne Barr and Van Jones.
There is an ever growing part of this country that thinks communism is better.
They all need to get correctly educated about what really happens with communism.
And the left call the right stupid.
Why do they want our country to become communists, so that millions of us will be killed ?
That is what happens under communist rule.

 

[paulitician]

Just another dupe-job by this President and his cronies. His followers have been so duped. He says one thing but does another. Now China is our bestest buddies in the whole wide world. What a scam. Everyone should watch the movie 'The Obama Deception.' He's not what he was advertised to be.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are not, hard core far right extremists, what you claim to be: patriots. You are not classical liberals, even of the conservative strain.