edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
- 1,830
No you will have 1 million.Lol...my bad, you're rightNo you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousandNumber in thousands means the same in both charts.It is not an act...I have the BLS open in a separate tabJust stop the dumb act, please.
Lets look at another BLS chart.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey
Series Id: LNS11000000
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Civilian Labor Force Level
Labor force status: Civilian labor force
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Now the current size of the labor force is listed in the chart as 164556. Do you really think the entire USA labor force is 1 hundred and 64 thousand 5 hundred and 56 people out of a population of over 300 million or is it 164,556,000?????
No, not at all
One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand
sounds plausible
Now, that being the case, going back to 6855
what is this number in thousands
Six thousand, 855 thousands is not a numerical number
And Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.
Come on admit it, it will not kill you to admit the truth, you survived admitting the labor force is One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand and not One hundred sixty four thousand, five hundred fifty six.
So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand
So, if I add 145,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand