Obama, the killing machine!!!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by healthmyths, Oct 17, 2012.

  1. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,216
    Thanks Received:
    2,041
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,841
    Obama's agenda in life apparently is to create MORE ways to kill more people... I know that sounds crazy but why else would he:

    1) Why does Obama want more people killed in car accidents?

    Obama was VERY proud of this statement made in the last debate:
    "That means that in the middle of the next decade, any car you buy, you're going to end up going twice as far on a gallon of gas. "
    Transcript And Audio: Obama-Romney 2nd Presidential Debate : NPR

    The ONLY minor problem with that is there is a trade off.
    The higher the CAFE standard means lighter cars.
    Lighter cars result in additional deaths!
    The relationship is very direct!

    "Increasing the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standard is therefore likely to result in cars that save drivers money in gas, but also are less safe, less capable of hauling people and stuff, and more expensive. Ryan Balis pointed out years ago, in a brief survey of numerous studies on the matter, that CAFE regulations result in additional deaths on highways, as people inevitably drive smaller, lighter cars.
    To put this another way, in order to reduce the amount of gasoline used per mile, the regulation forces a higher number of deaths per mile.

    Deadly Fuel Economy Standards - Economics for Everybody

    But IF that's not enough Obama is ALL for continued killing of people in other ways.
    Every year in the USA 1.25 million future wage earners murdered.... many with government funding.. i.e. Planned Parenthood!
    While MOST conservatives totally understand that 2.9% abortions or 36,400 mothers, life in danger, 1% or 13,000 due rape/incest is regrettable....
    still 1.25 million future Einsteins, Steve Jobs, Steven Hawkings, are murdered... murdered out of CONVENIENCE!!!

    And Obama is OK with the murder of 1.25 million a year future Americans... future tax payers!! Does that make any sense???

    Finally Obama for some reason wants to destroy our health care system and in doing so eventually promote euthanasia.
    Proof?

    Obamacare's IPAB:
    When Government Takes Over Health Care, You Become A Budget Item. As a physician, I would like to make you aware of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, or IPAB, a key element of the administration's federal takeover of medicine. IPAB is a board consisting of 15 unelected, appointed bureaucrats whose task it is to cut the growth of Medicare spending, and the cuts they are mandated to make will be deep. The decisions IPAB makes behind closed doors can only be overturned by a supermajority of Congress, something almost impossible to achieve.

    Care? No, this is a pathway to killing people that doctors deem worthless. It sounds like a well-worked-out schedule for providing the best possible approach to treating a patient. Accordingly, when relatives have been asked to sign up to the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), that's precisely what they thought they were agreeing to. And, in theory, that's what it is supposed to be. [...] In practice, however, the LCP has turned into something quite different. For while in some cases it has been used properly as intended, with numerous others it has become, instead, a backdoor form of euthanasia.

    Obamacare: Mandatory Socialized Medicine

    So we have Obama wanting more car deaths, having YOUR tax dollars pay for 1.25 million murders a year of future Americans and when Americans get too old KILL them!

    I know some of you really naive, extreme kool aid types that STILL think that Obama can "slow the rising oceans and healing the planet" won't believe that Obama really has this agenda but IT IS REAL!
    For example rather then LET me drive efficiently getting better mileage because I am a responsible driver, OBAMA wants MORE dangerous cars on the road!
    Rather then EDUCATE young girls AND FORCING the YOUNG MEN who are accomplices to MURDER to take responsibility.. Obama says let the state pay!

    And rather then DEAL with the FACTS there is NOTHING wrong with 97.5% of Americans covered by health insurance, Obama spews the lie about 50 million uninsured and in doing so INSURES Older people will be euthanized because there won't be enough money !!

    All as part of Obama's KILLING MACHINE!!!
     
  2. buckeye45_73
    Offline

    buckeye45_73 Lakhota's my *****

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    16,854
    Thanks Received:
    1,737
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +5,960
    I agree, we need more cars made of balsa wood......maybe a real strong paper mache.
     
  3. Bigfoot
    Offline

    Bigfoot NRA

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,070
    Thanks Received:
    467
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +467
    Thankfully it looks like Romney may be able to undo some of Obama's nonsense.
     
  4. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,104
    Thanks Received:
    9,264
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,387
    I think we've gone round and round with this in another thread.
    I doubt safety standards will be sacrificed. In fact I bet car makers will find new ways to increase safety features as they trim pounds from a vehicle.
     
  5. Bigfoot
    Offline

    Bigfoot NRA

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,070
    Thanks Received:
    467
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +467
    ..and pass the savings on to us...oh, damn, nevermind..
     
  6. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,104
    Thanks Received:
    9,264
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,387
    Savings? I don't get it.

    We'll be using less gasoline overall. There will still be mid- and luxury size vehicles. That's why it's called Average Fuel Economy.
     
  7. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,216
    Thanks Received:
    2,041
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,841
    YES the CAFE standard would definitely be met for SURE!

    But remember, I didn't say that lighter weight cars cause more deaths I'm sharing FACTS!
    THE FACTS are just that!
    To put this another way, in order to reduce the amount of gasoline used per mile, the regulation forces a higher number of deaths per mile.

    And while this article I'm submitting you for intelligent discourse I would hope says HEAVIER cars have more accidents and at first blush sounds like I'm refuting my contention, that increasing CAFE means reducing weight meaning more deaths.. HERE IS THEIR summation!

    "And all things being equal, a heavier car is safer than a light one.

    American cars are getting heavier and heavier. Is that dangerous? - Slate Magazine

    So laugh monkey boy but facts and reality is a heavier car means a safer car!
     
  8. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,104
    Thanks Received:
    9,264
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,387
    So take care of you heavy car so it lasts longer.
     
  9. Wolfsister77
    Offline

    Wolfsister77 Knowledge Is Power Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2012
    Messages:
    9,177
    Thanks Received:
    3,866
    Trophy Points:
    385
    Location:
    Lake Country
    Ratings:
    +4,700
    Seems like a joke post.
     
  10. Clementine
    Offline

    Clementine Platinum Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    10,561
    Thanks Received:
    3,878
    Trophy Points:
    350
    Ratings:
    +8,700
    I know the left hates SUVs and pickup trucks. I have heard complaints that it's not fair for people to drive those because the smaller cars don't fare well up against them in the accidents. My solution would be for everyone to be in a safer car, not everyone at a higher risk of death for even the most minor accident.


    Obama is one step ahead of those who want to do that. The whole cash for clunkers was a way to get rid of the older, heavier cars. They were destroyed rather than parted out. Wouldn't want to make it easy for people to keep their old safe car on the road.
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2012

Share This Page