Obama regime considers military action against Syrian government

[Dale Smith]

Endless war, embrace it, it's bipartisan. And don't forget to bitch about the deficit.

The only one that can do anything about it is the Commander in Chief, with or without Congressional support.

Not true. Russia can put an end to obama's nonsense then win the peace in Aleppo.Nothing is going to make obama stop supporting the terrorists. Hilly will do the same.Send a couple of planes over New York and Washington. Bloody his nose. Send obambam into his cave hiding.

The far rwnjs and alt right are supporting the terrorists by interfering with US foreign policy. Tipsy is seditiously supporting the Russians.

Wrong, Jake......the terrorists are the ones attacking Assad...you know, CIA funded and backed al qaeda/ISIS.....you see, they fight proxy wars for USA.INC.......let me know if I can school you further.

 

[Bleipriester]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

What is Obama going to do? Let them use nukes against his own people?

There is no use of force against civilians by the Syrian and Russian governments.

Wrong!

Syria's chemical weapons stockpile - BBC News

And what does this prove? That you have no proof, no point and no argument?

Proof that your comments were wrong about the force used by Syrian and Russian governments!

Casualties of the Syrian Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Although you can include Obama in that as well!

Civilian Death Toll From Coalition Airstrikes in Syria Could Be Single Largest in U.S.-Led War on ISIS

We can not use figures posted by a guy in London whose name is "Syrian Observatory for Human Rights". This one man observatory has neither the means not the neutrality to be accepted as independent source. The figures by this "SOHR" are pure fabrications.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Endless war, embrace it, it's bipartisan. And don't forget to bitch about the deficit.

The only one that can do anything about it is the Commander in Chief, with or without Congressional support.

And yet, here we are, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .....

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What? Is he gonna draw more lines? Play tic-tac-toe?

 

[pwjohn]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

There's nothing to win over there.

Yes, there is. At first, the Syrians can get rid of the terrorists. A big win, don´t you think? Looks like the US fears to lose not only the humanitarian mask but also the military superiority mask. Everyone who still supports this bunch of bloodthirsty warmongers, knows exactly he´s on the wrong side.

I offer no support to the Syrian regime. None whatsoever. But the time for us (the military ) to bully the world at gunpoint, is long past.

We have slaughtered millions of people since the end of WWII and if anything, things are worse now than ever before.

 

[Bleipriester]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

There's nothing to win over there.

Yes, there is. At first, the Syrians can get rid of the terrorists. A big win, don´t you think? Looks like the US fears to lose not only the humanitarian mask but also the military superiority mask. Everyone who still supports this bunch of bloodthirsty warmongers, knows exactly he´s on the wrong side.

I offer no support to the Syrian regime. None whatsoever. But the time for us (the military ) to bully the world at gunpoint, is long past.

We have slaughtered millions of people since the end of WWII and if anything, things are worse now than ever before.

I support the Syrian government.

 

[pwjohn]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

There's nothing to win over there.

Yes, there is. At first, the Syrians can get rid of the terrorists. A big win, don´t you think? Looks like the US fears to lose not only the humanitarian mask but also the military superiority mask. Everyone who still supports this bunch of bloodthirsty warmongers, knows exactly he´s on the wrong side.

I offer no support to the Syrian regime. None whatsoever. But the time for us (the military ) to bully the world at gunpoint, is long past.

We have slaughtered millions of people since the end of WWII and if anything, things are worse now than ever before.

I support the Syrian government.

Whatever dude. Had we not gotten involved over there Assad could have easily crushed Isis before they got even so much as a toehold in Syria. Like it never happened.

Same for Libya.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Had obama not stuck his dick in over there, Assad would have put that rebellion down in a week. There would be no refugee crisis, the Syrian Christians would not have been slaughtered. This entire thing is his fault.

 

[Bleipriester]

Russia warns US against striking Syrian Army: ‘S-300, S-400 air defenses in place’
Russian MoD warns US-led coalition against airstrikes targeting Syrian Army

 

[pwjohn]

Those oversized garbage can looking things tilted skyward can and will shoot our planes down.

 

[Bleipriester]

After covert operations were considered, the Americans are painting their jets "Russian".

"Canadian journalist Christian Borys, who first published the photos on his official Twitter account, noted out that the painting is a common practice of a standard training.

However, social media activists accused the United States of scheming false flags attacks in order to hold Russia responsible."

US aircrafts in Russian camouflage feared for false flag attacks in Syria

 

[EvilCat Breath]

obama is releasing isis fighters from prisons hoping they will fight Russians.

He got the idea from the success of releasing prisoners in the US to kill Americans.

US 'plotting to allow 9,000 ISIS fighters to escape terror capital Mosul', Moscow claims

 

[Bleipriester]

It is again discussed how the US can do harm to Syria:

"According to a report from Reuters, the Obama regime is considering the increase in U.S. involvement in Syria, using different methods to attack the Syrian government, including airstrikes on military, radar, anti-aircraft bases, as well as arms deports.

The U.S. is also mulling over a covert military operation that would evade approval from the United Nations Security

Another possible scenario is the increase in military aid to "moderate" rebel groups"
US considers airstrikes against the Syrian Army

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Ever since Congress shot him down, he hasn't been serious about Syria.

Congress struggling with how to vote on Syria attack