Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And how does that work with a Democrat holding the veto stamp? Ironically, the success of the 90's came about because Clinton and a Republican congress worked together. What a concept.
That only happened after Clinton lost the Senate, and Congress, and he came back towards the center, Maggie. No denying that, I'm wondering if barry will be as smart, but right now he is too far left for the majority of Americans, and there is no denying that, either. What a concept that would be for obama....
Still, though, there was not the anger between the parties that Obama has to put up with. Clinton and Gingrich always had a good working relationship, even calling each other at 3AM with an idea to toss around. (Of course for the sake of saving face for their respective constituents, they didn't exactly show that affection in public.) There was also still solid camaraderie among the lawmakers who would often debate loudly on the respective floors, only to be found huddled over drinks and cigars after the gavel fell which is where the compromises were made. Unfortunately, along came the sex scandal, and Republicans saw their way in, many breaking all ties they had with Clinton for political expediency.
The Mice Have Had Their Say, Now Maggie The Cat Will Speak...
I don't know how much attention spam you Libs have, probably not much more than an infant, but here goes with lesson two....
Democrats and consequently the Democrat Party are both evil. When we had NO Federal Government Jefferson (Democrat Party founder) was against a large Federal Government. Make sense?
Then when the Federal Government is bloated beyond imagining, and beyond sanity, guess what? Yes, Democrats, wouldn't you know it, want an even larger and larger Federal Government. You see, they always want what is BAD for America. Make sense? If you are a Demoncrat it sure does.
Now they, due to the laws of life, get about half of the votes in this country consistently. It is beyond me how they get any, but evil is ingrained in mankind and they are the device of choice for organizing it, so they do win elections.
For the last 80 years since 1932, they have, plus Democrat Wilson, been trying to spend America to death. The total government tax take, local, state and federal is now over 60% of the entire GDP. That means all of us and everything else must live on about 40% of our total GDP. These parasites are drinking our blood. Keeping in mind that the entire governmental structures of this country have never in 200 years ever produced one loaf of bread, one pair of shoes, one car, or anything of value whatsoever.
Due to their power Democrats are able to coax, induce, and bully Republicans into going along with them quite often. Evil has it attractions and its power. So, you get Reagan letting Democrats spend like crazy in a deal where they would allow him to build up the military, and the economy, in order to destroy the USSR. The price they exacted was skyrocketing domestic welfare-state spending. He and Tip O'Neil made a deal on that. OK? In order to save the nation and the world from communism, Reagan had to agree to this spending spree by Democrats.
Bush one, and two, ditto. In order for them to get Democrat support for fighting terrorism and safeguarding the nation, and the economy they had to barter away a vast domestic spending sprees, consisting of hundreds of programs, including free Prescription Drugs for old people.
These are the facts of life, and we must deal with them as best we can. Every bad thing Republicans have done has been forced on them by Democrats through extortion and blackmail, and that is the truth. Check it out.
What's truly funny about your rant is that you apparently think that Sarah Palin is the answer to all that "evil" done by Washington politicians, including Republicans who simply kowed to liberal demands. (That's funny all by itself...)
Unfortunately for you and others who think she's God's Gift to [whatever], when she puts on her politician's hat, she ain't no conservative after all.
Sarah Palin's Alaskonomics - TIME
Alaska residents each get a yearly check for about $2,000 from oil revenues, plus an additional $1,200 pushed through by Palin last year to take advantage of rising oil prices. Any sympathy the governor of Alaska expresses for folks in the lower 48 who are suffering from high gas prices or can't afford to heat their homes is strictly crocodile tears.
So Palin thinks it's Ok for the oil companies to gouge Americans in the lower 48 states, as long as she can return a windfall profits tax to Alaskans only. Now I know what she means by Alaska First. Furthermore:
As if it couldn't support itself, Alaska also ranks No. 1, year after year, in money it sucks in from Washington. In 2005 (the most recent figures), according to the Tax Foundation, Alaska ranked 18th in federal taxes paid per resident ($5,434) but first in federal spending received per resident ($13,950). Its ratio of federal spending received to federal taxes paid ranks third among the 50 states, and in the absolute amount it receives from Washington over and above the amount it sends to Washington, Alaska ranks No. 1.
And her love of earmarks is right up there, too:
Palin's Embrace of Earmarks - Washington Post Investigations
. If she is Conservative she is bad, if she is Liberal she is bad. She can't win against that kind of onslaught. 
The Mice Have Had Their Say, Now Maggie The Cat Will Speak...
I don't know how much attention spam you Libs have, probably not much more than an infant, but here goes with lesson two....
Democrats and consequently the Democrat Party are both evil. When we had NO Federal Government Jefferson (Democrat Party founder) was against a large Federal Government. Make sense?
Then when the Federal Government is bloated beyond imagining, and beyond sanity, guess what? Yes, Democrats, wouldn't you know it, want an even larger and larger Federal Government. You see, they always want what is BAD for America. Make sense? If you are a Demoncrat it sure does.
Now they, due to the laws of life, get about half of the votes in this country consistently. It is beyond me how they get any, but evil is ingrained in mankind and they are the device of choice for organizing it, so they do win elections.
For the last 80 years since 1932, they have, plus Democrat Wilson, been trying to spend America to death. The total government tax take, local, state and federal is now over 60% of the entire GDP. That means all of us and everything else must live on about 40% of our total GDP. These parasites are drinking our blood. Keeping in mind that the entire governmental structures of this country have never in 200 years ever produced one loaf of bread, one pair of shoes, one car, or anything of value whatsoever.
Due to their power Democrats are able to coax, induce, and bully Republicans into going along with them quite often. Evil has it attractions and its power. So, you get Reagan letting Democrats spend like crazy in a deal where they would allow him to build up the military, and the economy, in order to destroy the USSR. The price they exacted was skyrocketing domestic welfare-state spending. He and Tip O'Neil made a deal on that. OK? In order to save the nation and the world from communism, Reagan had to agree to this spending spree by Democrats.
Bush one, and two, ditto. In order for them to get Democrat support for fighting terrorism and safeguarding the nation, and the economy they had to barter away a vast domestic spending sprees, consisting of hundreds of programs, including free Prescription Drugs for old people.
These are the facts of life, and we must deal with them as best we can. Every bad thing Republicans have done has been forced on them by Democrats through extortion and blackmail, and that is the truth. Check it out.
What's truly funny about your rant is that you apparently think that Sarah Palin is the answer to all that "evil" done by Washington politicians, including Republicans who simply kowed to liberal demands. (That's funny all by itself...)
Unfortunately for you and others who think she's God's Gift to [whatever], when she puts on her politician's hat, she ain't no conservative after all.
Sarah Palin's Alaskonomics - TIME
Alaska residents each get a yearly check for about $2,000 from oil revenues, plus an additional $1,200 pushed through by Palin last year to take advantage of rising oil prices. Any sympathy the governor of Alaska expresses for folks in the lower 48 who are suffering from high gas prices or can't afford to heat their homes is strictly crocodile tears.
So Palin thinks it's Ok for the oil companies to gouge Americans in the lower 48 states, as long as she can return a windfall profits tax to Alaskans only. Now I know what she means by Alaska First. Furthermore:
As if it couldn't support itself, Alaska also ranks No. 1, year after year, in money it sucks in from Washington. In 2005 (the most recent figures), according to the Tax Foundation, Alaska ranked 18th in federal taxes paid per resident ($5,434) but first in federal spending received per resident ($13,950). Its ratio of federal spending received to federal taxes paid ranks third among the 50 states, and in the absolute amount it receives from Washington over and above the amount it sends to Washington, Alaska ranks No. 1.
And her love of earmarks is right up there, too:
Palin's Embrace of Earmarks - Washington Post Investigations
Sarah Is Always Right
There is no pleasing the "Pick at Palin" Pinkos
Fact is, Democrats are scared Sh**less of her, but everything they do and say against her makes her stronger, for if God is for her, who can be against her.
She did her job as mayor of a city, and governor of Alaska superbly, witness the 80 plus % approval rating she had, and has.
She is the penultimate mother grizzly bear, and she takes care of her cubs. When she was governor she took care of Alaska ONLY, and when she is President, which she will be, she will take care of America ONLY. She can only do one job at a time.
Sure, earmarks are bad, but as long as they are legal ANY legislator that does not beg, borrow and steal to get them for his, or her, state is derelict in their duty.
I oppose earmarks, but were I in Congress, or a governor, I would get all I could for MY state. That would be my job until the rules are changed, you play by the rules, or you are an idiot.
What's truly funny about your rant is that you apparently think that Sarah Palin is the answer to all that "evil" done by Washington politicians, including Republicans who simply kowed to liberal demands. (That's funny all by itself...)
Unfortunately for you and others who think she's God's Gift to [whatever], when she puts on her politician's hat, she ain't no conservative after all.
Sarah Palin's Alaskonomics - TIME
Alaska residents each get a yearly check for about $2,000 from oil revenues, plus an additional $1,200 pushed through by Palin last year to take advantage of rising oil prices. Any sympathy the governor of Alaska expresses for folks in the lower 48 who are suffering from high gas prices or can't afford to heat their homes is strictly crocodile tears.
So Palin thinks it's Ok for the oil companies to gouge Americans in the lower 48 states, as long as she can return a windfall profits tax to Alaskans only. Now I know what she means by Alaska First. Furthermore:
As if it couldn't support itself, Alaska also ranks No. 1, year after year, in money it sucks in from Washington. In 2005 (the most recent figures), according to the Tax Foundation, Alaska ranked 18th in federal taxes paid per resident ($5,434) but first in federal spending received per resident ($13,950). Its ratio of federal spending received to federal taxes paid ranks third among the 50 states, and in the absolute amount it receives from Washington over and above the amount it sends to Washington, Alaska ranks No. 1.
And her love of earmarks is right up there, too:
Palin's Embrace of Earmarks - Washington Post Investigations
Sarah Is Always Right
There is no pleasing the "Pick at Palin" Pinkos
Fact is, Democrats are scared Sh**less of her, but everything they do and say against her makes her stronger, for if God is for her, who can be against her.
She did her job as mayor of a city, and governor of Alaska superbly, witness the 80 plus % approval rating she had, and has.
She is the penultimate mother grizzly bear, and she takes care of her cubs. When she was governor she took care of Alaska ONLY, and when she is President, which she will be, she will take care of America ONLY. She can only do one job at a time.
Sure, earmarks are bad, but as long as they are legal ANY legislator that does not beg, borrow and steal to get them for his, or her, state is derelict in their duty.
I oppose earmarks, but were I in Congress, or a governor, I would get all I could for MY state. That would be my job until the rules are changed, you play by the rules, or you are an idiot.
You know what? Even if Sara Palin was the most brilliant and fair politician out there, I couldn't stand listening to her piercing voice for four years straight. Can anyone imagine her sitting down with heads of state and sounding like an adult instead of a teenager on steroids ranting about her BFF competition?
. Admit it. 
Also Clinton tried to rape and sexually assault women.You don't understand leftywinger......the Senate, and the Congress, and the presidency of one party doesn't work, it's not working with the current administration either. I don't want the Senate, Congress and presidency of either party to be one, I want the checks and balances to work, and it only works when BOTH parties have SOME power in policy making.
Maybe now you will understand
Been there done that..
We ended up with a Republican Congress that hired a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton within months of assuming office and they kept the investigations going for seven years.
To show how well they wanted to work together, the Republicans even trumped up impeachment proceedings.
I would give the GOP six weeks after assuming Congressional control to trump up some investigation against Obama
Like I said......been there, done that...don't want to repeat the same mistake
I really do feel sorry for you, leftwinger. If Clinton hadn't LIED to a Grand Jury, perhaps impeachment would have been a moot subject.
When Clinton lost control of the House, that is when he started making progress as a leader of this great nation. You can deny that all you want, but the truth is the truth, and you can keep your pathetic "been there done that" crap, because it's BS and you know it.
You have no response except to come up with your partisan bullshit, dude.
i guarantee obama gets two terms
As long as the republicans can get control of the Senate, or Congress, we will survive the barry era.
We tried allowing the Republicans to control the House and Senate......it didn't work
One problem.....
Have you seen the stiffs the GOP has available to run against him?
Have you seen the economy in the last year?
Obama landslide in 2012
One problem.....
Have you seen the stiffs the GOP has available to run against him?
Have you seen the economy in the last year?
Obama landslide in 2012
Yeah Palin is, as always, lookin' good... and the economy is a DISASTER... with a multi-trillion dollar HC boondoggle just put in place to assure that the same thing that the left just did to the Mortgage, real-estate and building industry happens to the HC industry.
We really need to establish an election night suicide-watch for this clown... preferably with video...
You don't understand leftywinger......the Senate, and the Congress, and the presidency of one party doesn't work, it's not working with the current administration either. I don't want the Senate, Congress and presidency of either party to be one, I want the checks and balances to work, and it only works when BOTH parties have SOME power in policy making.
Maybe now you will understand
Been there done that..
We ended up with a Republican Congress that hired a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton within months of assuming office and they kept the investigations going for seven years.
To show how well they wanted to work together, the Republicans even trumped up impeachment proceedings.
I would give the GOP six weeks after assuming Congressional control to trump up some investigation against Obama
Like I said......been there, done that...don't want to repeat the same mistake
I really do feel sorry for you, leftwinger. If Clinton hadn't LIED to a Grand Jury, perhaps impeachment would have been a moot subject.
When Clinton lost control of the House, that is when he started making progress as a leader of this great nation. You can deny that all you want, but the truth is the truth, and you can keep your pathetic "been there done that" crap, because it's BS and you know it.
You have no response except to come up with your partisan bullshit, dude.
Why would anyone listen to advice from his enemy that wants to kill him? When Democrats give us Republicans advice, the smart thing for us to do is to do the exact opposite.
You Lefties say we would be foolish to nominate Sarah, well, that means the best thing for us to do is to nominate her, which is exactly what we are going to do.
If you think she would be such a disaster for us you should be encouraging us to nominate her, right? So, get off her case and encourage us to self-destruct. LOL
RW will eat his words when time comes to pay our debts
Strange.......
I didn't see your forcasts of doom when George Bush DOUBLED the debt
or when Ronald Reagan TRIPLED the debt
Been there done that..
We ended up with a Republican Congress that hired a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton within months of assuming office and they kept the investigations going for seven years.
To show how well they wanted to work together, the Republicans even trumped up impeachment proceedings.
I would give the GOP six weeks after assuming Congressional control to trump up some investigation against Obama
Like I said......been there, done that...don't want to repeat the same mistake
I really do feel sorry for you, leftwinger. If Clinton hadn't LIED to a Grand Jury, perhaps impeachment would have been a moot subject.
When Clinton lost control of the House, that is when he started making progress as a leader of this great nation. You can deny that all you want, but the truth is the truth, and you can keep your pathetic "been there done that" crap, because it's BS and you know it.
You have no response except to come up with your partisan bullshit, dude.
GOP answer to not being in power was to trump up bogus investigations on Whitewater and a Blowjob. They tied up the country for years with endless BS investigations.
Same thing they will do if they ever get power again
Why would anyone listen to advice from his enemy that wants to kill him? When Democrats give us Republicans advice, the smart thing for us to do is to do the exact opposite.
You Lefties say we would be foolish to nominate Sarah, well, that means the best thing for us to do is to nominate her, which is exactly what we are going to do.
If you think she would be such a disaster for us you should be encouraging us to nominate her, right? So, get off her case and encourage us to self-destruct. LOL
Please nominate half governor Palin.
Please!
Why would anyone listen to advice from his enemy that wants to kill him? When Democrats give us Republicans advice, the smart thing for us to do is to do the exact opposite.
You Lefties say we would be foolish to nominate Sarah, well, that means the best thing for us to do is to nominate her, which is exactly what we are going to do.
If you think she would be such a disaster for us you should be encouraging us to nominate her, right? So, get off her case and encourage us to self-destruct. LOL
you spoke like a true partisan hack. If the democrats say "save the country", you should say "to hell with the country, as you d rather have it die than recover under democratic rule". Good luck with the elections: let s do the experience thingy again next presidential election, ok?
Finally something we agree upon.Why would anyone listen to advice from his enemy that wants to kill him? When Democrats give us Republicans advice, the smart thing for us to do is to do the exact opposite.
You Lefties say we would be foolish to nominate Sarah, well, that means the best thing for us to do is to nominate her, which is exactly what we are going to do.
If you think she would be such a disaster for us you should be encouraging us to nominate her, right? So, get off her case and encourage us to self-destruct. LOL
Please nominate half governor Palin.
Please!
Why would anyone listen to advice from his enemy that wants to kill him? When Democrats give us Republicans advice, the smart thing for us to do is to do the exact opposite.
You Lefties say we would be foolish to nominate Sarah, well, that means the best thing for us to do is to nominate her, which is exactly what we are going to do.
If you think she would be such a disaster for us you should be encouraging us to nominate her, right? So, get off her case and encourage us to self-destruct. LOL
Who to pick?
1) Famous and succesfull TV- & media clown aka hockey mom aka mouse hunter aka failed governor (governor who quited on her people) aka "failed VP pick" aka extremist tea-party clown aka failed "conservative" mother (pregnant 16 year old doughter) aka ... .
2) Or mr successful community organizer (During his three years as the DCP's director, its staff grew from one to thirteen and its annual budget grew from $70,000 to $400,000) aka successful law scholar (president of the Harvard Law Review + graduating with a Juris Doctor: J.D.) aka professor at the University of Chicago (teached constitutional law) aka mr President.
Hmm, hard to chose ... mr succesfull? Or mss loser?
