Obama DID steal the last election

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by RetiredGySgt, Feb 27, 2009.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,581
    Thanks Received:
    5,905
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,002
    I have no real proof, but I have as much as the left has against Bush and the claims he stole elections. So I will spend the next however many years obsessing about it and making ignorant claims he did it. As proof I will offer the absence of any real proof. Works so well for the left after all. I figure if I am loud enough and post it enough times people will start to believe it just cause they have heard it so much.

    I mean with him controlling the Congress and Justice Department we will never have an investigation so that too is proof he did it. And since the left keeps claiming the electronic voting machines are rigged and he won all those states with them, further proof he stole the election. And lets not forget the long lines to vote around the country, I mean that was used as evidence Bush stole elections so it must now be true that Obama stole the election.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4
  2. American Horse
    Offline

    American Horse AKA "Mustang"

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,741
    Thanks Received:
    892
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    The Hoosier Heartland
    Ratings:
    +938
    That's right Gunny, Remember the left's usual claim that "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." That was the case in the Anita Hill charges against then Judge Clarence Thomas, and it's the basis for "investigating" anything about a Republican in national politics.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    naw, you cant keep that up
    you dont actually believe it thus you are not braindead
     
  4. Epsilon Delta
    Offline

    Epsilon Delta Jedi Master

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,687
    Thanks Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Central America
    Ratings:
    +364
    But Gunny, Obama won by over 10,000,000 votes while Bush won by -500,000. Are they really comparable?
     
  5. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    except POTUS isnt eleceted by popular vote
     
  6. Modbert
    Offline

    Modbert Daydream Believer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    33,178
    Thanks Received:
    2,957
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,962
    There have been three other times in history where someone won the popular vote but lost the election.

    John Quincy Adams stole the election in 1824 over Andrew Jackson.

    Rutherford B. Hayes stole the election in 1876 over Samuel Tilden.

    Benjamin Harrison stole the election in 1888 over Grover Cleveland.

    Notice a pattern here?
    Not saying whether Bush stole the election or not, but logically case #4 would follow #1-3.

    The circumstances of how Bush came to be President are actually similar to Hayes's if I recall correctly.
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2009
  7. Epsilon Delta
    Offline

    Epsilon Delta Jedi Master

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,687
    Thanks Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Central America
    Ratings:
    +364
    *Shrugs* Whatever. It coincides like 99% of the time, and even then the result went from +5 to +90-something
     
  8. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    yes, it does usually
    but thats not what elects a POTUS
    and it doesnt matter if its a +5 or a +1 in the EC vote
     
  9. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,581
    Thanks Received:
    5,905
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,002
    You may need to actually read your history books, John Quincy Adams won because the House of Representatives selected him per the Constitution when no one had the needed majority.

    Neither of the other two stole the election either, both won because they, following the Constitution, won the required majority of ELECTORAL votes in the Electoral College.

    You may want to bone up on how our Presidents have ALWAYS been elected, you seem to not understand the law and the Constitution much at all.

    As for Bush , he too won because the ELECTORAL College elected him as required by the Constitution. After he won more electoral votes then Gore and had the required number to qualify per , again, the Constitution.

    His win in Florida has been proven over and over by recounts after the fact as well as the official recount. Those extra recounts being conducted by people TRYING to prove Bush lost and failing.

    Article II section 1 of the Constitution.

    Amendment 12 to the US Constitution.

    Section 1 of Amendment 20 to the US Constitution. Replacing the bolded part along with Amendment 25.


    LII: Constitution
     
  10. jaded110
    Offline

    jaded110 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Messages:
    67
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Bethpage, Long Island, NY
    Ratings:
    +12
    There you go, then.
     

Share This Page