Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,826
- 350
Congress had cut the security budget.
Obama had nothing to do with it.
Issa FAIL.
This wasn't a matter of simple daily security. This was in response to threats from terrorists. That doesn't mean saying, "Gee, sorry, it's not in the budget." It's about quickly responding to direct threats from terrorists. I suppose those budget cuts are responsible for not allowing our troops to use any force to defend themselves against attacks. I guess someone figured it was cheaper to bring them home in caskets rather than allow them to use bullets to stop the enemy. Meanwhile, Michelle costs us millions a year on her vacations and various government agencies are stocking up on ammo. Shame they couldn't loan some to our troops in the hot zone.
I guess the only time a budget isn't a consideration is when Obama is buying votes.
Im still trying to remember when the last budget was submitted, let alone passed
I know. They never say no to vacations or more programs to encourage dependency. They don't care about our troops enough to at least let them protect themselves against attacks or defend in the face of hostile actions. Our ambassador was hung out to dry and now we find out the threat was known in advance.
Obama and all those who outright lied about this should be called on the carpet yesterday.
Oh, and regarding the assinine comment that security to save the ambassador's life wasn't in the budget, explain why increasing foreign aid, including the Muslim Brotherhood, is in the damn budget:
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/oba...-80-spent-76-more-foreign-aid-border-security
Last edited: