Obama Better For Economy, Business Executives Say

[Avorysuds]

And for the record, what a bias bullshit thread. Obama's economy is compared to that of the Great Depression, I don't care what some people that don't even live in the US and definitely don't have out best interest in mind think of what's best for the US economic policy. There is about a 207% chance our economy is doing better than theirs… So yes please, advize us. And lets see what that advice is.... "Be MORE like us after being MORE like us failed you." More Government spending, lol... Never cuts, how odd is that?

 

[Stephanie]

And for the record, what a bias bullshit thread. Obama's economy is compared to that of the Great Depression, I don't care what some people that don't even live in the US and definitely don't have out best interest in mind think of what's best for the US economic policy. There is about a 207% chance our economy is doing better than theirs… So yes please, advize us. And lets see what that advice is.... "Be MORE like us after being MORE like us failed you." More Government spending, lol... Never cuts, how odd is that?

right on..
good ole Rooters, another DNC pushing rag

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Thanks for the laugh OP....

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

LONDON, Aug 17 (Reuters) - Twice as many business executives around the world say the global economy will prosper better if incumbent U.S. president Barack Obama wins the next election than if his Republican challenger Mitt Romney does, a poll showed on Friday.

Enough said. Your argument is invalid.

The result was different among respondents in the United States, where a slim majority thought Romney would be better for their businesses than Obama.

Oh, really?? Whoda thunk it.

We can write this thread off

 

[Stephanie]

Thanks for the laugh OP....

they are desperate for some good news for the Obama, he sure isn't thought of being good for the economy by the people here at home..

 

[daveman]

Obama is better for the economy than

...a plague of frogs
...a civilization killing asteroid impact

But not by much.

 

[Stephanie]

LONDON, Aug 17 (Reuters) - Twice as many business executives around the world say the global economy will prosper better if incumbent U.S. president Barack Obama wins the next election than if his Republican challenger Mitt Romney does, a poll showed on Friday.

Enough said. Your argument is invalid.

The result was different among respondents in the United States, where a slim majority thought Romney would be better for their businesses than Obama.

Oh, really?? Whoda thunk it.

We can write this thread off

LOL, I already did...
but good find my dear

 

[expat_panama]

Obama Better For Economy, Business Executives Say...

This is rich.

What we hear from foreign business leaders is they want the US to be stuck with Obama, and US execs say "NOOOOOO!!!". Next we'll be hearing foreign military leaders wanting four more years of Obama, and the headline will be

OBAMA BETTER FOR DEFENSE, MILITARY LEADERS SAY

 

[Rozman]

I'm supposed to trust the opinions of world leaders?
They gave this guy the Nobel Prize before he did anything!!!
The USA's credit ratinng has been downgraded on Obama's watch.
We don't even have a budget almost 4 years into his Presidency.
Unemployment has been a steady 8% all through his term.
Record number of people on food stamps,unemployment insurance and disability insurance
because their UE bennies ran out.
The housing market a shambles....

And the Europeans feel better about the World economy with this guy on for another term???



This shit it too much

 

[Star]

Obama is better for the economy than

...a plague of frogs
...a civilization killing asteroid impact

But not by much.

Yep you're right, here in the USofA the numbers are close - probably within the margin error but-----but if you take away the finance industry-----i.e. the finance industry that builds nothing and has cut wayyyyy back on job creating consumer and small business loans then-----then it looks like a majority of American business executives support President Obama's economic plan over that of the lyin' Ryan/Romney/Bush plan.

Whoda thunk?-----Republicans won't take my word for it, but here's what the Financial Times has to say...




Worldwide businesses back Obama - Financial Times


August 16, 2012
By Sarah O’Connor in London and Richard McGregor in Washington

Business executives from around the world think it would be better for the global economy if Barack Obama remained US president than if Mitt Romney unseated him in November, according to the FT/Economist Global Business Barometer survey.​

Twice as many of the 1,700 executives in the survey said a victory for Mr Obama would be better for the global economy than said the same for Mr Romney. The remaining 37 per cent thought it would make no difference who won the election.​

Opinion was more balanced among respondents in North America, where 37 per cent said Mr Obama would be better compared with 33 per cent for Mr Romney.​

Executives in every region said another term for Mr Obama would be better for their own companies too, except in North America where slightly more respondents said Mr Romney would be more beneficial.​

The survey was carried out in the last two weeks of July, before Mr Romney picked Paul Ryan as his vice-presidential candidate. ​

Its results run counter to general perceptions, at least in the US, where Mr Romney has gone out of his way to stress his support for business and his determination to reduce regulation.​

Mr Romney has received strong backing from the finance industry in particular, which backed Mr Obama with substantial donations in 2008 but has now switched its fundraising support to the Republican candidate.​

Mr Romney has promised to repeal the Dodd-Frank legislation regulating the financial sector, open more federal lands to oil and gas production, ease environmental controls on coal mining and roll back Washington’s power to regulate business.​

But Mr Romney’s plans to overhaul the tax system may hold danger for some businesses, as he says he will do away with a raft of tax concessions in order to help make up for revenue lost by across-the-board cuts in tax rates. Mr Romney and Mr Ryan have yet to specify what deductions they would abolish.​

 

[kiwiman127]

It seems that some don't quite get the implications on the world economy and how it relates to the US. Foreign investment is huge for the US. And that in itself is kinda sad. Between 2002-2008 almost as many jobs were crated offshore than were created domestically.
World economy.

 

[daveman]

Obama is better for the economy than

...a plague of frogs
...a civilization killing asteroid impact

But not by much.

Yep you're right, here in the USofA the numbers are close - probably within the margin error but-----but if you take away the finance industry-----i.e. the finance industry that builds nothing and has cut wayyyyy back on job creating consumer and small business loans then-----then it looks like a majority of American business executives support President Obama's economic plan over that of the lyin' Ryan/Romney/Bush plan.

You need to provide documentation for that claim.

 

[hortysir]

of course

When he takes money from us and gives it to them, we become weaker, giving them the advantage.

about 37% were honest though

Um....do you want to explain to us when and how the US gives money to Europe?

You've never tracked the Stimulus/Bail Out monies, have you?

 

[Star]

But not by much.

Yep you're right, here in the USofA the numbers are close - probably within the margin error but-----but if you take away the finance industry-----i.e. the finance industry that builds nothing and has cut wayyyyy back on job creating consumer and small business loans then-----then it looks like a majority of American business executives support President Obama's economic plan over that of the lyin' Ryan/Romney/Bush plan.

You need to provide documentation for that claim.

What "claim" would that be?

 

[emptystep]

I don't have much faith that the policies in place are going to be good for this economy.

I have a lot of faith that the policies MITT proposes would be disasterous for this nation.

There's my choice.

Something not very good, versus something I am pretty sure is much much worse.

Obama is probably going to get my vote, unless something VERY dramatic happens to change my mind.

And that's what politicians count on, people to vote for something they don't even like... As long as they seem ever so slightly less bad than the other guy.

This country deserves to fall apart lol.

I am much more pleased with someone choosing between the lesser of two evils, if that is the way they want to look at it, than someone voting for someone because the other person is a socialist or some other completely irrational explaination.

 

[Saigon]

Um....do you want to explain to us when and how the US gives money to Europe?

You've never tracked the Stimulus/Bail Out monies, have you?

Not to Europe, no.

The US no more 'gives money' to Europe than Europe does to the US.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

 

[bigrebnc1775]

One more month of 8% unemployment or higher and it will match obama presidency number 43.

 

[Saigon]

One more month of 8% unemployment or higher and it will match obama presidency number 43.

Unemployment in Spain right now is 23%.

France and Italy are both around 10.5, the EU on average 11.1.

If you are going to whine about US unemployment, you simply have to take into consideration unemployment in other countries, othewise your posts just seem disnigenuous.

It's like a worker complaining that he only earn $50K per year when most of his co-workers earn $40K.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

One more month of 8% unemployment or higher and it will match obama presidency number 43.

Unemployment in Spain right now is 23%.

France and Italy are both around 10.5, the EU on average 11.1.

If you are going to whine about US unemployment, you simply have to take into consideration unemployment in other countries, othewise your posts just seem disnigenuous.

It's like a worker complaining that he only earn $50K per year when most of his co-workers earn $40K.

Considering this is America anything above 8% is unacceptable. It always has been.