Obama attacks Reid's Senate opponent.

[Lonestar_logic]

Will someone please show me the "attack"?

if I didn't know better I would think you were kidding.


Main Entry: 1at·tack
Pronunciation: \ə-ˈtak\
Function: verb
Etymology: Middle French attaquer, from Old Italian *estaccare to attach, from stacca stake, of Germanic origin; akin to Old English staca
Date: 1562
transitive verb
1 : to set upon or work against forcefully
2 : to assail with unfriendly or bitter words
3 : to begin to affect or to act on injuriously <plants attacked by aphids>
4 : to set to work on <attack a problem>
5 : to threaten (a piece in chess) with immediate capture

Good....now, here is the news story from the link provided by the OP:

LAS VEGAS — President Barack Obama is going on the attack against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's Republican opponent, saying her views are too extreme and ridiculing her comments on the BP oil spill.

Obama never mentioned tea party-backed Sharron Angle by name at a campaign rally Thursday night at a Las Vegas casino. Calling her "Harry's opponent," Obama castigated Angle for referring to a $20 billion victims' compensation fund for the Gulf oil spill as a "slush fund."

After coming under attack for the remark Thursday Angle took it back. Obama ridiculed that, too: "I'm sure she meant slush fund in the nicest possible way," he said.

Said Obama: "She favors an approach that's even more extreme than the Republicans we've got in Washington. That's saying something."

STILL, looking for an "attack"...

Still? Even after I provided the definition of "attack"? You do know that an attack doesn't explicitly mean a physical confrontation, don't you?

 

[Stephanie]

LOL, every American SHOULD ATTACT Reids opponent.

all we hear from the left is, attact attact attact.

yep, they ARE the tolerant peaceful ones alright.

Holy crap! "attact"??? Don't tell me it's a misspelling because you did it 4 times. Seriously????

Stephanie, now I'm convinced your ridiculous viewpoints aren't your fault, you obviously lack a basic high school education and were never taught the ability to think critically, let alone basic spelling.

Hence she is now on many peoples' IGNORE LIST. I recommend you try the same approach.

I hope they do become a wuss like you.

 

[VaYank5150]

obie wan, attacker de jour

You continually use the term, but I'm not quite sure if you actually think "Obie wan" is some sort of insult. Have you seen Star Wars? Obie Wan was the good guy and very wise. I'm sure you didn't realize that though since you are on this site all day crying about the downfall of our country....who has time for watching movies.

I'm still trying to figure out what "de jour" is??

 

[VaYank5150]

if I didn't know better I would think you were kidding.


Main Entry: 1at·tack
Pronunciation: \&#601;-&#712;tak\
Function: verb
Etymology: Middle French attaquer, from Old Italian *estaccare to attach, from stacca stake, of Germanic origin; akin to Old English staca
Date: 1562
transitive verb
1 : to set upon or work against forcefully
2 : to assail with unfriendly or bitter words
3 : to begin to affect or to act on injuriously <plants attacked by aphids>
4 : to set to work on <attack a problem>
5 : to threaten (a piece in chess) with immediate capture

Good....now, here is the news story from the link provided by the OP:

LAS VEGAS — President Barack Obama is going on the attack against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's Republican opponent, saying her views are too extreme and ridiculing her comments on the BP oil spill.

Obama never mentioned tea party-backed Sharron Angle by name at a campaign rally Thursday night at a Las Vegas casino. Calling her "Harry's opponent," Obama castigated Angle for referring to a $20 billion victims' compensation fund for the Gulf oil spill as a "slush fund."

After coming under attack for the remark Thursday Angle took it back. Obama ridiculed that, too: "I'm sure she meant slush fund in the nicest possible way," he said.

Said Obama: "She favors an approach that's even more extreme than the Republicans we've got in Washington. That's saying something."

STILL, looking for an "attack"...

Still? Even after I provided the definition of "attack"? You do know that an attack doesn't explicitly mean a physical confrontation, don't you?

Yes, and since I can find nothing that Obama said that even remotely fits the definition you provided, I am STILL looking for the "attack"...

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Steph is on a lot of ignore lists? hmmmm, I think I'd better take a closer look at her. She has potential.

 

[RDD_1210]

LOL, every American SHOULD ATTACT Reids opponent.

all we hear from the left is, attact attact attact.

yep, they ARE the tolerant peaceful ones alright.

Holy crap! "attact"??? Don't tell me it's a misspelling because you did it 4 times. Seriously????

Stephanie, now I'm convinced your ridiculous viewpoints aren't your fault, you obviously lack a basic high school education and were never taught the ability to think critically, let alone basic spelling.

And I'm suppose to care what you think why?
and thanks for the attact on me.

Of course you don't care what I think. As you shouldn't. But maybe you should care about being able to use your own brain. I'm still laughing that you spelled it 'attact'. Maybe english isn't your first language? Nah, that can't be it, cause only uneducated americans are the ones who think Obama is the anti-christ.

 

[Stephanie]

Steph is on a lot of ignore lists? hmmmm, I think I'd better take a closer look at her. She has potential.

LOL, I'm on "a lot" peoples ignore list probably only in the little mind of the VaYanker.
but hey, such is life.

 

[Stephanie]

Holy crap! "attact"??? Don't tell me it's a misspelling because you did it 4 times. Seriously????

Stephanie, now I'm convinced your ridiculous viewpoints aren't your fault, you obviously lack a basic high school education and were never taught the ability to think critically, let alone basic spelling.

And I'm suppose to care what you think why?
and thanks for the attact on me.

Of course you don't care what I think. As you shouldn't. But maybe you should care about being able to use your own brain. I'm still laughing that you spelled it 'attact'. Maybe english isn't your first language? Nah, that can't be it, cause only uneducated americans are the ones who think Obama is the anti-christ.

save your uppity sermon for someone who cares.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Good....now, here is the news story from the link provided by the OP:



STILL, looking for an "attack"...

Still? Even after I provided the definition of "attack"? You do know that an attack doesn't explicitly mean a physical confrontation, don't you?

Yes, and since I can find nothing that Obama said that even remotely fits the definition you provided, I am STILL looking for the "attack"...

Then you're dumber than I originally thought.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Still? Even after I provided the definition of "attack"? You do know that an attack doesn't explicitly mean a physical confrontation, don't you?

Yes, and since I can find nothing that Obama said that even remotely fits the definition you provided, I am STILL looking for the "attack"...

Then you're dumber than I originally thought.

Your honor, I must protest. If Lonestar has ever had an original thought there is no evidence of it.

 

[VaYank5150]

Still? Even after I provided the definition of "attack"? You do know that an attack doesn't explicitly mean a physical confrontation, don't you?

Yes, and since I can find nothing that Obama said that even remotely fits the definition you provided, I am STILL looking for the "attack"...

Then you're dumber than I originally thought.

In other words, you provided the definition of "attack" and have since reliazed YOU can't find anything in Obama's comments that fit the definition, either. Thank you. Sit down.

 

[RDD_1210]

And I'm suppose to care what you think why?
and thanks for the attact on me.

Of course you don't care what I think. As you shouldn't. But maybe you should care about being able to use your own brain. I'm still laughing that you spelled it 'attact'. Maybe english isn't your first language? Nah, that can't be it, cause only uneducated americans are the ones who think Obama is the anti-christ.

save your uppity sermon for someone who cares.

Uppity? As in someone who at least graduated high school?

I'll be honest, I actually feel bad for you and many of the other people on this site who are obviously not exposed to much of the world to be able to really understand how it works. That leads to a narrow viewpoint without much real world basis or validity. It's easy to think the sky is falling when all you listen to is the select few who preach such things.

 

[Jack Fate]

Holy crap! "attact"??? Don't tell me it's a misspelling because you did it 4 times. Seriously????

Stephanie, now I'm convinced your ridiculous viewpoints aren't your fault, you obviously lack a basic high school education and were never taught the ability to think critically, let alone basic spelling.

And I'm suppose to care what you think why?
and thanks for the attact on me.

Of course you don't care what I think. As you shouldn't. But maybe you should care about being able to use your own brain. I'm still laughing that you spelled it 'attact'. Maybe english isn't your first language? Nah, that can't be it, cause only uneducated americans are the ones who think Obama is the anti-christ.

I'm still laughing at you because you're just another bitter moonbat clinging to Obama's ass.

 

[Stephanie]

Of course you don't care what I think. As you shouldn't. But maybe you should care about being able to use your own brain. I'm still laughing that you spelled it 'attact'. Maybe english isn't your first language? Nah, that can't be it, cause only uneducated americans are the ones who think Obama is the anti-christ.

save your uppity sermon for someone who cares.

Uppity? As in someone who at least graduated high school?

I'll be honest, I actually feel bad for you and many of the other people on this site who are obviously not exposed to much of the world to be able to really understand how it works. That leads to a narrow viewpoint without much real world basis or validity. It's easy to think the sky is falling when all you listen to is the select few who preach such things.

good for you, you feel bad for me.
now do I have to pay for your psychobabble or what?

 

[RDD_1210]

And I'm suppose to care what you think why?
and thanks for the attact on me.

Of course you don't care what I think. As you shouldn't. But maybe you should care about being able to use your own brain. I'm still laughing that you spelled it 'attact'. Maybe english isn't your first language? Nah, that can't be it, cause only uneducated americans are the ones who think Obama is the anti-christ.

I'm still laughing at you because you're just another bitter moonbat clinging to Obama's ass.

Bitter? About what exactly? I don't think I'm claiming the country is doomed like so many people here. Feel free to link me to the post where I am bitter or clinging to Obamas ass. Obama is FAR from perfect, I'll agree with that all day long.

 

[RDD_1210]

save your uppity sermon for someone who cares.

Uppity? As in someone who at least graduated high school?

I'll be honest, I actually feel bad for you and many of the other people on this site who are obviously not exposed to much of the world to be able to really understand how it works. That leads to a narrow viewpoint without much real world basis or validity. It's easy to think the sky is falling when all you listen to is the select few who preach such things.

good for you, you feel bad for me.
now do I have to pay for your psychobabble or what?

Nah, that's free. Even though Republicans don't agree, I think the needy people of our country should be given a freebie every now and then. Enjoy.

 

[Stephanie]

Uppity? As in someone who at least graduated high school?

I'll be honest, I actually feel bad for you and many of the other people on this site who are obviously not exposed to much of the world to be able to really understand how it works. That leads to a narrow viewpoint without much real world basis or validity. It's easy to think the sky is falling when all you listen to is the select few who preach such things.

good for you, you feel bad for me.
now do I have to pay for your psychobabble or what?

Nah, that's free. Even though Republicans don't agree, I think the needy people of our country should be given a freebie every now and then. Enjoy.

awwww, you're just the sweetest and cute as can be.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Yes, and since I can find nothing that Obama said that even remotely fits the definition you provided, I am STILL looking for the "attack"...

Then you're dumber than I originally thought.

In other words, you provided the definition of "attack" and have since reliazed YOU can't find anything in Obama's comments that fit the definition, either. Thank you. Sit down.

Yea ridiculing someone isn't the same as attacking.


Only an idot would argue over semantics. And that makes you an idiot.

 

[VaYank5150]

Then you're dumber than I originally thought.

In other words, you provided the definition of "attack" and have since reliazed YOU can't find anything in Obama's comments that fit the definition, either. Thank you. Sit down.

Yea ridiculing someone isn't the same as attacking.


Only an idot would argue over semantics. And that makes you an idiot.

....says the moran who posted the definition of "attack" only to find out later that his argument that Obama "attacked" someone didn't fit the definition

 

[Lonestar_logic]

In other words, you provided the definition of "attack" and have since reliazed YOU can't find anything in Obama's comments that fit the definition, either. Thank you. Sit down.

Yea ridiculing someone isn't the same as attacking.


Only an idot would argue over semantics. And that makes you an idiot.

....says the moran who posted the definition of "attack" only to find out later that his argument that Obama "attacked" someone didn't fit the definition

Not my fault you're an idiot.