healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 29,349
- 10,802
- 900
Again.. this is the "smartest" most efficient president and administration????
Obama administration sent an email asking..
"What would you ask President Obama?"
I asked:
When China gets the 1 million barrels from Canada per day it will put entire coast at risk of a supertanker wrecks..Remember Exxon Valdez?
The pipeline carries in one mile ONLY 300 barrels that any spill would be considerable less damaging.
So why is the President WANT not only a HIGHER RISK of a accident i.e. think of the cruise ship wreck last week??) but MORE environment at risk..i.e. 20,000 square miles of ocean, millions of fish.. when a less chance of a spill i.e. buried pipeline and less oil at the most 300 barrels per mile is rejected?
I think environmentally the BIGGER risk is shipping 1 million barrels per day in a ship wreck prone tanker would have been considered!!!
====================================
The answer to my question...
Due to the high volume of messages received at this address, the White House is unable to process the email you just sent. To contact the White House, please visit:
Contact the White House | The White House
Thank you.
Well isn't that nice!
So busy they couldn't answer my question.. which is more risky 1 million barrels or 300?
Obama administration sent an email asking..
"What would you ask President Obama?"
I asked:
When China gets the 1 million barrels from Canada per day it will put entire coast at risk of a supertanker wrecks..Remember Exxon Valdez?
The pipeline carries in one mile ONLY 300 barrels that any spill would be considerable less damaging.
So why is the President WANT not only a HIGHER RISK of a accident i.e. think of the cruise ship wreck last week??) but MORE environment at risk..i.e. 20,000 square miles of ocean, millions of fish.. when a less chance of a spill i.e. buried pipeline and less oil at the most 300 barrels per mile is rejected?
I think environmentally the BIGGER risk is shipping 1 million barrels per day in a ship wreck prone tanker would have been considered!!!
====================================
The answer to my question...
Due to the high volume of messages received at this address, the White House is unable to process the email you just sent. To contact the White House, please visit:
Contact the White House | The White House
Thank you.
Well isn't that nice!
So busy they couldn't answer my question.. which is more risky 1 million barrels or 300?