NYMagazine: "It is therefore in the interest of the progressive movement to undermine the Court’s legitimacy" if you cant control it, you burn it down

[basquebromance]

they want to promote the perception of judicial corruption, in order to implement their agenda that they can't pass through legislation

What Conservatives Can’t Say About Clarence Thomas

The best defense of the Supreme Court justice’s ethical lapses is that everyone already knows he’s just a conservative activist in a robe.

nymag.com

 

[Esdraelon]

They are determined to destroy the underpinning of our nation and to so frustrate people with their unaccountable lawlessness that people simply give up. Many will do so. A lot more will fight it when the time comes...

 

[occupied]

The court is undermining itself without any help from anyone.

 

[excalibur]

They have one objective, destroy the Republic and replace it with mob rule aka "democracy".

 

[Dadoalex]

they want to promote the perception of judicial corruption, in order to implement their agenda that they can't pass through legislation

What Conservatives Can’t Say About Clarence Thomas

The best defense of the Supreme Court justice’s ethical lapses is that everyone already knows he’s just a conservative activist in a robe.

nymag.com

SCOTUS isn't corrupt because of me.
It's corrupt because ideology has become more important than legal acumen in picking justices.
And since the GOP ideology is "get yours," it's not surprising that GOP appointed justices are corrupt.

 

[occupied]

They have one objective, destroy the Republic and replace it with mob rule aka "democracy".

Clarence Thomas was taking unreported gifts from a billionaire for years. You okay with that? Of course you are.

 

[excalibur]

Clarence Thomas was taking unreported gifts from a billionaire for years. You okay with that? Of course you are.

Yep, no problem as the guy had no cases in front of the Court.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor didnât recuse herself from cases involving publisher that paid her $3M: reportÂ

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor didn’t recuse herself from multiple cases involving a book publisher – Penguin Random House – which paid her more than $3 million since 2010, according t…

nypost.com

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Yeah, I think the ship on credibility and integrity has already sailed with the Supreme Court. It's a joke.
20 year term limits. After that, find something else to do with your life.

 

[occupied]

Yep, no problem as the guy had no cases in front of the Court.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor didnât recuse herself from cases involving publisher that paid her $3M: reportÂ

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor didn’t recuse herself from multiple cases involving a book publisher – Penguin Random House – which paid her more than $3 million since 2010, according t…

nypost.com

Hack.

 

[excalibur]

Hack.

Yes, you are.