Lonestar_logic
Republic of Texas
- May 13, 2009
- 24,539
- 2,233
- 205
O'Donnell will win the senate seat even without the NRSC's help.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wow, so now the lefties are giving ADVICE to the Republican party and telling them to "dump" the American citizens WHO SUPPORTED them but is now saying with their VOTES, we WANT A CHANGE...
don't that just make ya feel all warm and tingly
LOL.....Delaware is a fucking tollbooth. You can have it. We've already won by sending the message to the RNC that we CONSERVATIVES won't accept any more RINO's even if we lose a few elections. By the time the left wing nutters like you figure that out, you'll be the minority party again.
We will gladly lose the battle over the tollbooth that is Delaware, and win the war for the country.
PS - I can't understand why any hyper partisan left wing nutjob would be happy that Rangel won? His corruption trial won't be a distraction will it?? Nah!! not at all!!
You have sent notice that you are content with a party that represents the 25-30% far right conservatives only........a sure formula for failure
The GOP needs to dump its social conservative wing and establish itself as a party of fiscal conservatism. Fiscal conservatism does not mean cut taxes, it means balancing a budget. Something Republicans have never done
I'd say that taking advice from partisans as yourself would be an exercise in stupidity. I'm amazed at the time liberal partisans spend advising the other party partisans, seems there are better ways to spend your time like working for your own candidates?
I'd say that taking advice from partisans as yourself would be an exercise in stupidity. I'm amazed at the time liberal partisans spend advising the other party partisans, seems there are better ways to spend your time like working for your own candidates?
LOL.....Delaware is a fucking tollbooth. You can have it. We've already won by sending the message to the RNC that we CONSERVATIVES won't accept any more RINO's even if we lose a few elections. By the time the left wing nutters like you figure that out, you'll be the minority party again.
We will gladly lose the battle over the tollbooth that is Delaware, and win the war for the country.
PS - I can't understand why any hyper partisan left wing nutjob would be happy that Rangel won? His corruption trial won't be a distraction will it?? Nah!! not at all!!
You have sent notice that you are content with a party that represents the 25-30% far right conservatives only........a sure formula for failure
The GOP needs to dump its social conservative wing and establish itself as a party of fiscal conservatism. Fiscal conservatism does not mean cut taxes, it means balancing a budget. Something Republicans have never done
I'd say that taking advice from partisans as yourself would be an exercise in stupidity. I'm amazed at the time liberal partisans spend advising the other party partisans, seems there are better ways to spend your time like working for your own candidates?
You know I like you, Jillian, but I'm not sure I'd be taking pride a Rangel win...
As for Castle/O'Donnell, I'm not convinced she will win, in fact I'm guessing she won't.
The NRSC WANTED to support a candidate who called for Bush's impeachment?
You know I like you, Jillian, but I'm not sure I'd be taking pride a Rangel win...
As for Castle/O'Donnell, I'm not convinced she will win, in fact I'm guessing she won't. Castle would have been a shoo-in. If control comes down to one senator, Republicans/conservatives will be kicking themselves for not recognizing the need for backing a candidate who could win over the need to "send a message." Any message conservatives are trying to send will be lost amidst the laughter over their short sightedness in Delaware.
You know I like you, Jillian, but I'm not sure I'd be taking pride a Rangel win...
As for Castle/O'Donnell, I'm not convinced she will win, in fact I'm guessing she won't. Castle would have been a shoo-in. If control comes down to one senator, Republicans/conservatives will be kicking themselves for not recognizing the need for backing a candidate who could win over the need to "send a message." Any message conservatives are trying to send will be lost amidst the laughter over their short sightedness in Delaware.
I don't take 'pride' in it, hon. and if i were in his district, i wouldn't have voted for him. but it amuses me because it annoys the rightwingnuts.
as for the rest, i agree with you. but pat buchanan said it this morning... it's like when they picked goldwater... they preferred to lose with him, rather than win with Rockefeller. it's stupid but they don't care.
and i'm fine with that because it opened up seats to dems that would otherwise have been lost. but i also like seeing smart people of both parties in congress. these choices are embarrassing.
I'd say that taking advice from partisans as yourself would be an exercise in stupidity. I'm amazed at the time liberal partisans spend advising the other party partisans, seems there are better ways to spend your time like working for your own candidates?
you're right, hon. you should choose insane and subliterate extremists and racists to represent the right. at least it's honest.
how 'bout that palladino, eh?
You know I like you, Jillian, but I'm not sure I'd be taking pride a Rangel win...
As for Castle/O'Donnell, I'm not convinced she will win, in fact I'm guessing she won't. Castle would have been a shoo-in. If control comes down to one senator, Republicans/conservatives will be kicking themselves for not recognizing the need for backing a candidate who could win over the need to "send a message." Any message conservatives are trying to send will be lost amidst the laughter over their short sightedness in Delaware.
Not sure what good a 1 seat majority is. If you can not count on them all to stick to the plan. I rather have them send the message and not win the senate this time. Than end up with a super thin majority with a handful of Liberal Republicans who render you unable to do anything with it.
I'd say that taking advice from partisans as yourself would be an exercise in stupidity. I'm amazed at the time liberal partisans spend advising the other party partisans, seems there are better ways to spend your time like working for your own candidates?
you're right, hon. you should choose insane and subliterate extremists and racists to represent the right. at least it's honest.
how 'bout that palladino, eh?
Yeah, I'm all about backing extremists like Palin or Obama. Seriously.
O'Donnell won't lack support and the RNC might live to regret this
O'Donnell won't lack support and the RNC might live to regret this
Pretty much my take. The RNC is saying basically 'f u' to voters of winner. Not a good place to be and doesn't bode well for their actions next year.
I've thought all along that the tea parties may be the end of the GOP. Though Dems should not take comfort in that.
You know I like you, Jillian, but I'm not sure I'd be taking pride a Rangel win...
As for Castle/O'Donnell, I'm not convinced she will win, in fact I'm guessing she won't. Castle would have been a shoo-in. If control comes down to one senator, Republicans/conservatives will be kicking themselves for not recognizing the need for backing a candidate who could win over the need to "send a message." Any message conservatives are trying to send will be lost amidst the laughter over their short sightedness in Delaware.
Not sure what good a 1 seat majority is. If you can not count on them all to stick to the plan. I rather have them send the message and not win the senate this time. Than end up with a super thin majority with a handful of Liberal Republicans who render you unable to do anything with it.
Point taken. I was keeping it simple to make a point, but you're right. Though I'm not convinced sending a message is worth the future of the country, I suppose we need to start somewhere...