Nov. 2016: A group of armed men seize FOX/MSNBC buildings & demand to hold Elections

You have THREE selections - For or Against


  • Total voters
    7

pvsi

VIP Member
Nov 17, 2013
2,527
116
85
November 2016. A group of armed men enter a few major media networks and demand to hold elections on a US government independent of the establishment committee, citing numerous violations of US constitution by the previous politicians that sprung out from the Major networks such as Fox News and MSNBC including the democrat and republican party. You can make up to 3 selections in your vote:

1. - FOR democratic presidential candidate
2. - AGAINST democratic presidential candidate
3. - FOR republican presidential candidate
4. - AGAINST republican presidential candidate
5. - FOR the X candidate
6. - AGAINST the X candidate


ABOUT X CANDIDATE: X candidate was denied opportunity to speak to you on both the left and the right leaning media networks, including the so called “independent” media networks; he was banned from dozens of political forums on internet, his both parents were imprisoned in USSR for speaking out against communism when he was a child, yet he has been called a socialist on this one forum in which he is still allowed to post; he claims to be against both democrats and republicans, he does not trust any independent parties including Libertarians; he promises this:

- No interest on people's money
- All democratic elections must include “against” option
- Every citizen of the world over the age of 50 receives a modest retirement paid by their nation's government
- Politicians can not live behind gated communities
- Property taxes must never rise
- People on public assistance prohibited from having more than 2 children (lawless Island exception)
 
Dude, if you keep on posting crazy stuff like this, you are gonna be Clive Bundy'd by the feds!
 
Maybe I will find some militia friends to back me up then
 
I wonder if people are really that suppressed in America that they are AFRAID to vote in anything that is not endorsed by the establishment?
 
I think youre likely to be reported for planning terrorist activity - good luck with that, retard.
 
th_3stoogesfacepalm_zps468ce075.jpg
 
R. C., armed revolt to change the outcome of elections you can't win will only result in your death or imprisonment.
 
I vote for Option (7).

The SWAT team goes into the studio and wipes-out the little Fokkers, taking no prisoners...
 
Last edited:
Considering that your X candidate is an idiot and has asinine positions and that I will not be voting for a republican or a democrat there really is nothing for me to check off. What a surprise.
 
I am against the Democratic and Republican candidate. I have no illusions that there is going to be an altruistic candidate.
Not on the establishment media, which is at the moment eyes and ears to the outside world for much of the world:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I seriously hope the FBI and NSA are monitoring this particular OP. Twice mentioning the desire to storm television stations and demand people vote their way.

Amazing how anyone could think they can have legitimate elections at the point of a gun.
 
I am against the Democratic and Republican candidate. I have no illusions that there is going to be an altruistic candidate.
Not on the establishment media, which is at the moment eyes and ears to the outside world for much of the world:


Your alternative platform i about as altruistic as a hungry lion devouring an antelope.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Forum List

Back
Top