http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/rnc/9574/index.html Father to Son: What I've Learned About Rage A conversation between a man of legendary fury and his son preparing to go to the barricades at the RNC, about the uses and abuses of Bush hatred. Severe fisking ahead! So much for 'dumb Bush'. Bring on the Evil Bush! Norman has even made up a new word to describe his impression of Bush, a study of smugsmanship. So Bush the Smugmiester! Maybe a bit of projection on his part. Ha! The Smugmeisters master plan, of course! The protestors engaging in riots and violence are useful idiots of the right, not the left! When the average American is now too dumb to understand the left, the left is probably screwed. Kind of a red flag to moderate voters, to hear pretentious things like Bush cabal. Maybe a bit too subtle for public consumption, ya think? Whatever the protestors do is a Republican distortion now? WoW! The only thing more asinine is to claim any act reflecting unfavorably upon the anti-Bush leadership is based upon Republican plants, working to undermine the serenity and sanity of what would otherwise be a perfectly rational, non-disruptive protest. I mean, hell, why not go that one step further into denial? (In plain English without the flowery rhetoric) Like a male demon believed to have sexual intercourse with sleeping women, the lie of Iraq sits over the first week of November. Ahh poetry. Huh? I dont get how everyone in the WTC was promised upper class success or how their companies failed them. Norman almost seems to blame corporations for 9-11. So basically they are like giant, hegemonic, towering, twin penises. Aside from the theoretically impossible act of Huns sacking France a full century after leaving Europe, an analogy is supposed to offer clarity or real life examples instead of some insane fantasy. I suppose there were no massive penile erections in that place and age to bring down, either. Sacking Versailles in 17th century France is like nuking all of D.C. and most of the U.S. Eastern Seaboard, as opposed to what is simply a franction of NYC. CHOP! And now they cut off our BALLS too!?! Norman's 9-11 trauma is a bit too fixated on genitals, ya think? Too late for the dumb Bush theory, because the speakers for the RNC are way too smart to imply any such thing. Not only inexplicable but uncountable and unidentifiable too. SWARMING FACTS! Maybe room for penetrating, icy, and knifelike reasoning to decipher 9-11 theories will be there but the odds are few readers know what incisive actually means. Old school leftist writers like to use the thesaurus to inject some rare word here an there, but its supposed to be pretentiously literate and not about communicating to their readers. Make a note! Thesaurus equivalent to: Conspiracist. Too hard for him to explain, or too hard for us to understand? Without trying to sound out a conspiracy, of course, I dont believe for a moment that Bush stuck a gerbil up his ass, either. But there may have been sentiment that Bush wanted a gerbil up his ass ---- Wow, maybe! Um, maybe! Maybe an attack on us from an asteroids by space aliens helping the Nazis would also not be the worst thing, and we might have still gone to war with the company of (Russians?) Britains. I could go all day. Well so fucking what, Norman? If Bush is accused of welcoming 9/11 just say it. Why not shut up then? Sounds like a classic case of conspiratorialism denial. They seemed to want it but I couldnt go that far Im sure it wasnt but its so odd how it was. Norman is trying to be coy. Or is seriously confused. Whatever it is there is still zero facts. More than unbelievable inefficiency is not enough. But Beyond more than unbelievable inefficiency is more than unbelievable. More like a game of poker where the entire committee of a full deck chose to discard the Joker guess who Norman is? Dont hold youre breath. But still presumptuous enough to say corporations are arguably prosperous, sure. You just did. But when you say Us its really YOU and the deep seated denial of the failure of communism. Question: Who is big and empty, interrupts our lives, acts without virtue, and flattens things? BINGO! RUN for your lives, it's the BIG EMPTY! Well he's made a living by sneering at everyone else. Thank god he's allowing "Buffalo" to go protest without Daddy's sneering condensation! Good boy, yes, good boy. And if Kerry wins then... no division? No, it's that Bush supporters simply dont matter anymore. The massive arrogance in this claim is obvious. Whatever it is hell need some crazy glue for that. Which is the way of saying your problem without saying anyone else matters. Seems to me that if we conquer the world, the problem is solved. As if when Kerry wins the same question is a non-issue, like some fantasy where nothing 'bad under Kerry can happen pretty demented. Sounds like a personal problem to me. No dont go. Its Rove with his tricks. (Yes, Norman Jr. will go.) Whatever seems to work, thats it, huh? http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=235519 1. A genuine attack to America and a reaction from its people, as if it's some kind of trick? 2. Hitlers flunkies never ran a Democracy, WTF did Goering know about Democracy? 3. Actually not in the testimony at all, but rather a record from a psychologist. 4. Also said from Goering: When I hear the word culture, I reach for my Browning." 5. An opiate junkie in the stages of withdrawal. 6. Under trial for his life, fallen from power and extremely stressed. 7. Committed suicide a few days after this discussion. Yet hes a genius about running a Democracy in the 21st century now. Lets go over the main points to date: LESTISTS HATE BUSH WITH BOILING RAGE: NORMAN SAYS KERRY IS HARDLY BETTER: NORMAN SAYS PROTESTING IS USELESS: And the final question! And armed how? THE ONLY HOPE TO CHANGE IS: Norman Mailers' spiritual standards: My friends in the USSR sure thought guys like him sucked ass, and felt he could die like Lenin and stay that way. So without commiting a felony by directly advocating an armed overthrow of America's government, it's the only implication published here. What's more worrisome, is that 'Buffalo', that is, Norman Jr., must have the straight-up version which doesn't really dance around Dad's real dream for revolutionary change.