- Banned
- #41
Clinton was charged with far worse.. somehow it was ignored.
actually...nothing was ignored at all.... a republican house of representatives impeached him and a republican senate acquitted him...
or did you MISS that part?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clinton was charged with far worse.. somehow it was ignored.
He was charged with perjury and obstruction of justice...the same thing Libby was charged with and the same thing Gonzales might be charged with. I'm willing to bet that you downplayed both Libby and Gonzales's situations too. Why is it different in Clinton's case?Clinton was charged with far worse.. somehow it was ignored.
He was charged with perjury and obstruction of justice...the same thing Libby was charged with and the same thing Gonzales might be charged with. I'm willing to bet that you downplayed both Libby and Gonzales's situations too. Why is it different in Clinton's case?
Should have been a slam-dunk case for Fitzgerald, huh?
LOL
OJ wasnt convicted either...still think he didnt do it?
Getting a blow job is far worse than outing a CIA agent? and who's living in a fantasy world again?
Question is 'who' outed the CIA agent? My guess is Libby will win on appeal. You know that, Fitzgerald knows that.
Coming from Chicago area, I have the highest respect for Fitzgerald, he just did wrong in this case.
does who outed the CIA agent somehow make it less treasonous?
Puddles, knock it off with the "it was just a blowjob!" bullshit.
Did you ever read the Starr Report? Oh, nevermind, stupid question - you didn't.
If you HAD read the Starr report, you'd know it "wasn't just a blowjob", that Monica had in fact given Bill a rimjob, ie tossed his salad, ie licked his balloon knot.
And by the way - no, I am not making this up.
Only in who gets the finger pointed at treason.
as long as you agree that intentionally outing an undercover CIA agent is a treasonous offense, that's all I care about.
and if it's one of yours, which seems to be the case? Not that she was 'undercover' by the books. But the one that seemed to 'out her' after her husband was of your ilk.
so Hayden, Bush's Director of Central Intelligence is a flip flopper?
or perhaps he was arguing a technicality (the word "undercover" being in the approved draft and not "covert") at the dinner and speaking the truth to Novacks - that she was, in fact, covert?
disprove that.
I'll wait.