Muslim Travel Ban Needed

[Bush92]

When Blue Bell ice cream was contaminated and causing people to become violently ill...they took ALL of their product off the shelves of our grocery stores. Not all the ice cream was bad...but the law said the risk was too great. Not all Muslim's are violent terrorist...but the risk is too great. They are contaminated. Minnesota is now in danger because of liberal politics. Was Minnesota in such a condition say 20 years ago?
Muslim ‘refugees’ threaten Minnesota community with rape

 

[Scamp]

"They are contaminated."

This^

 

[Bush92]

"They are contaminated."

This^

Indeed they are. They will always follow the laws of Islam and will never be loyal to the United States of America.

 

[basquebromance]

Founding Fathers flipped out when too many GERMANS moved to America. They certainly didn't want a bunch of Muslims showing up in burqas.

 

[RightyTighty]

Founding Fathers flipped out when too many GERMANS moved to America. They certainly didn't want a bunch of Muslims showing up in burqas.

The burka is religious freedom. I know, you hate that.

 

[gallantwarrior]

When Blue Bell ice cream was contaminated and causing people to become violently ill...they took ALL of their product off the shelves of our grocery stores. Not all the ice cream was bad...but the law said the risk was too great. Not all Muslim's are violent terrorist...but the risk is too great. They are contaminated. Minnesota is now in danger because of liberal politics. Was Minnesota in such a condition say 20 years ago?
Muslim ‘refugees’ threaten Minnesota community with rape

Round them up, load as many as possible onto Somali-bound charter flights...if you can find an airline that will take the contract...and air crop them over their homeland. The remaining animals should be sequestered in their current habitats and shot immediately if they exit their enclave. Barring appropriate government action to protect US citizens, the citizens living under this threat should take to the streets of the ghettos occupied by this invading human disease and shoot any threatening-looking inhabitant they encounter.
P.S. Most of the Somalis they foisted off on Alaska have long since left us, alas. I guess they didn't like the climate, or maybe the fact that Alaskans won't put up with their shit.

 

[Slade3200]

When Blue Bell ice cream was contaminated and causing people to become violently ill...they took ALL of their product off the shelves of our grocery stores. Not all the ice cream was bad...but the law said the risk was too great. Not all Muslim's are violent terrorist...but the risk is too great. They are contaminated. Minnesota is now in danger because of liberal politics. Was Minnesota in such a condition say 20 years ago?
Muslim ‘refugees’ threaten Minnesota community with rape

Under that simpleton logic we should arrest all black people because of the "contaminated" issues that Chicago is having. While we are at it maybe we should freeze the funds of all Million/Billionaires because of the corruption we've seen in banking and Wall Street. What do you think?

 

[waltky]

Granny glad to know...

Supreme Court says grandparents, grandkids exempted from travel ban
Thursday 20th July, 2017 - The Supreme Court dealt President Donald Trump's government a fresh setback Wednesday, July 19, saying its controversial travel ban cannot be applied to grandparents and other close relatives of people living in the United States -- for now, AFP says.0

The court accepted a Hawaii federal judge's ruling last week that the Trump administration had too narrowly defined what constitutes "close family relationships" to determine exceptions to the ban on travelers from six mainly Muslim countries -- Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. That left in place Judge Derrick Watson's wider definition, which includes grandparents, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, and cousins of people living in the United States. But in its brief order, the court backed the Trump administration by staying the part of Watson's ruling that would have expanded exemptions to its 120-day ban on all refugees.

The order said the Supreme Court's ruling is temporary, pending a federal appeals court's review of the issues. The Supreme Court itself was partially the source of the dispute, having ruled in late June that the 90-day travel ban, aimed at better screening out potential security risks, can be broadly enforced for travelers from the six countries "who lack any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States." Days later, the government interpreted that to mean that only "close family" was exempted -- which it defined as the parents, spouses, children, sons- and daughters-in-law, siblings and step- and half-siblings of people in the United States.

Hawaii, one of several states fighting the travel ban since Trump first announced it in January, filed a court motion arguing that grandparents and grandchildren were by all measures also "close family." After Watson accepted that argument, the Justice Department appealed the issue to the Supreme Court, asking the court to make its own definition of "bona fide relationship" and "close family." In its order Wednesday, the high court refused.

Watson had also ordered the administration to exempt from its 120-day refugee ban any refugee who already has a relationship with a US resettlement agency. But the court overruled that, allowing the California-based Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to rule on the issue. The Trump administration issued a one-line response to the high court's ruling. "The Department of Justice looks forward to presenting its arguments to the Ninth Circuit," it said.

Supreme Court says grandparents grandkids exempted from travel ban

 

[frigidweirdo]

When Blue Bell ice cream was contaminated and causing people to become violently ill...they took ALL of their product off the shelves of our grocery stores. Not all the ice cream was bad...but the law said the risk was too great. Not all Muslim's are violent terrorist...but the risk is too great. They are contaminated. Minnesota is now in danger because of liberal politics. Was Minnesota in such a condition say 20 years ago?
Muslim ‘refugees’ threaten Minnesota community with rape

How many terrorist acts were caused by refugees in the 90 days after Trump's first failed travel ban? None? Zero?

 

[Nia88]

Because people are ice cream.

 

[waltky]

Win for Trump Travel Ban...

Supreme Court Issues Temporary Order Upholding Trump Travel Ban
September 11, 2017 | WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a temporary order allowing the Trump administration to maintain its restrictive policy on refugees while the court considers challenges to the travel ban.

Justice Anthony Kennedy issued the temporary order Monday. It was expected to remain in effect while the full court takes up the matter, likely within a matter of days. Had the Supreme Court not acted, an appeals court decision lifting part of the ban on refugees would have gone into effect on Tuesday. If there further challenges to the refugee ban, Kennedy said, they should be filed to the nation's highest court by noon on Tuesday. The Trump administration made an emergency application to the Supreme Court Monday, asking for a stay on an earlier ruling by an appeals court, which effectively reinstated a 120-day ban on entry to the United States by almost all refugees. The lower court ruled last week that refugees could enter the country if a U.S.-based resettlement agency agreed to accept their cases.

The forthcoming ruling by the nine justices of the full Supreme Court could decide the fate of up to 24,000 refugees. If the decision goes against the refugees and their advocates, “We will fight it,” said Neal Katyal, a lawyer involved in defending would-be refugees and other travelers blocked from coming to the U.S. by President Trump's executive orders. In Monday's court filing, the Justice Department said the pending appellate court ruling “will disrupt the status quo and frustrate orderly implementation of the (presidential) order's refugee provisions.” Federal attorneys did not seek any immediate action Monday against a separate part of last the ruling issued last Thursday by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The lower court said Trump's ban on travelers from six Muslim-majority countries should not apply to the grandparents, aunts, uncles or cousins of legal U.S. residents.

Latest twist

Court action this week marked the latest twist in the prolonged legal battle over the president's immigration policies. Just after taking office in late January, President Trump issued an executive order that would have blocked nearly all refugee arrivals. After court challenges that stymied his plan, the president issued an amended version of his order in March that barred travelers from Iran, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen for 90 days, a move Trump argued was needed to prevent terrorist attacks. The Supreme Court ruled in June that the federal government could exclude prospective refugees who did not have a “bona fide” relationship to people or entities in the United States, prompting litigation over the meaning of that phrase.

The sun flares in the camera lens as it rises behind the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington​

Resettlement agencies argued that their commitment to provide services for specific refugees should count as a "bona fide" relationship. The Trump administration said it should not, meaning such refugees would be barred. Apart from the question of what constitutes “bona fide” relationships, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in October about whether Trump's travel ban discriminates against Muslims, in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

By the numbers

As lower courts and the Supreme Court weighed in on the travel and refugee bans in recent months, the U.S. refugee program has lurched from an ambitious projection of 110,000 arrivals for the year, to just a few hundred arrivals a week. Through the end of the fiscal year, September 30, fewer than 52,000 will have entered the United States during the previous 12 months — a population close to Trump's stated desire to cap arrivals at 50,000. The administration is expected to announce in the coming weeks what the maximum number of refugee arrivals for the coming fiscal year will be.

Supreme Court Issues Temporary Order Upholding Trump Travel Ban

 

[frigidweirdo]

Win for Trump Travel Ban...

Supreme Court Issues Temporary Order Upholding Trump Travel Ban
September 11, 2017 | WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a temporary order allowing the Trump administration to maintain its restrictive policy on refugees while the court considers challenges to the travel ban.

Justice Anthony Kennedy issued the temporary order Monday. It was expected to remain in effect while the full court takes up the matter, likely within a matter of days. Had the Supreme Court not acted, an appeals court decision lifting part of the ban on refugees would have gone into effect on Tuesday. If there further challenges to the refugee ban, Kennedy said, they should be filed to the nation's highest court by noon on Tuesday. The Trump administration made an emergency application to the Supreme Court Monday, asking for a stay on an earlier ruling by an appeals court, which effectively reinstated a 120-day ban on entry to the United States by almost all refugees. The lower court ruled last week that refugees could enter the country if a U.S.-based resettlement agency agreed to accept their cases.

The forthcoming ruling by the nine justices of the full Supreme Court could decide the fate of up to 24,000 refugees. If the decision goes against the refugees and their advocates, “We will fight it,” said Neal Katyal, a lawyer involved in defending would-be refugees and other travelers blocked from coming to the U.S. by President Trump's executive orders. In Monday's court filing, the Justice Department said the pending appellate court ruling “will disrupt the status quo and frustrate orderly implementation of the (presidential) order's refugee provisions.” Federal attorneys did not seek any immediate action Monday against a separate part of last the ruling issued last Thursday by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The lower court said Trump's ban on travelers from six Muslim-majority countries should not apply to the grandparents, aunts, uncles or cousins of legal U.S. residents.

Latest twist

Court action this week marked the latest twist in the prolonged legal battle over the president's immigration policies. Just after taking office in late January, President Trump issued an executive order that would have blocked nearly all refugee arrivals. After court challenges that stymied his plan, the president issued an amended version of his order in March that barred travelers from Iran, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen for 90 days, a move Trump argued was needed to prevent terrorist attacks. The Supreme Court ruled in June that the federal government could exclude prospective refugees who did not have a “bona fide” relationship to people or entities in the United States, prompting litigation over the meaning of that phrase.

The sun flares in the camera lens as it rises behind the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington​

Resettlement agencies argued that their commitment to provide services for specific refugees should count as a "bona fide" relationship. The Trump administration said it should not, meaning such refugees would be barred. Apart from the question of what constitutes “bona fide” relationships, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in October about whether Trump's travel ban discriminates against Muslims, in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

By the numbers

As lower courts and the Supreme Court weighed in on the travel and refugee bans in recent months, the U.S. refugee program has lurched from an ambitious projection of 110,000 arrivals for the year, to just a few hundred arrivals a week. Through the end of the fiscal year, September 30, fewer than 52,000 will have entered the United States during the previous 12 months — a population close to Trump's stated desire to cap arrivals at 50,000. The administration is expected to announce in the coming weeks what the maximum number of refugee arrivals for the coming fiscal year will be.

Supreme Court Issues Temporary Order Upholding Trump Travel Ban

Amazing how much you can "win" when you have all three branches on your side. Problem is you'd expect a president to do much better with all three parts of govt on his side.