Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The HLP website:"...all contributions to foreign terrorist organizations--even those for seemingly benign purposes--further those groups' terrorist activities. The Humanitarian Law Project claimed the law violated its First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. The Courts ruling said that was not the case.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Looks like they don't care much for the US or the Constitution. [/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]The Humanitarian Law Project is a non-profit organization founded in 1985, dedicated to protecting human rights and promoting the peaceful resolution of conflict by using established international human rights laws and humanitarian law. Our long-term objectives are to strengthen human rights standards ratified by nations around the globe and to foster communication on compelling international human rights issues among human rights activists, law faculty and students, members of Congress and their staffs, as well as interested citizens.[/SIZE][/FONT]
The Constitution is not a suicide pact. Free speech doesn't include plotting to destroy the USA. Unless you're on our enemies side, which is quite possible if you're a Liberal, what part of that do you not understand?
From the article:
The HLP website:"...all contributions to foreign terrorist organizations--even those for seemingly benign purposes--further those groups' terrorist activities. The Humanitarian Law Project claimed the law violated its First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. The Courts ruling said that was not the case.
Humanitarian Law Project
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Looks like they don't care much for the US or the Constitution. [/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]The Humanitarian Law Project is a non-profit organization founded in 1985, dedicated to protecting human rights and promoting the peaceful resolution of conflict by using established international human rights laws and humanitarian law. Our long-term objectives are to strengthen human rights standards ratified by nations around the globe and to foster communication on compelling international human rights issues among human rights activists, law faculty and students, members of Congress and their staffs, as well as interested citizens.[/SIZE][/FONT]
will obama go to jail for sending money to gaza? will bush go to jail for help hezbollah? will oliver north go to jail for supporting the contras?
fuck marshall
High Court: Americans Cant Help Terrorists Liveshots
now we can't send non-violent etc aid to some group just because some asshole in DC calls them a terrorist group?
fuck marshall
High Court: Americans Cant Help Terrorists Liveshots
now we can't send non-violent etc aid to some group just because some asshole in DC calls them a terrorist group?
fuck marshall
High Court: Americans Cant Help Terrorists Liveshots
now we can't send non-violent etc aid to some group just because some asshole in DC calls them a terrorist group?
fuck marshall
High Court: Americans Cant Help Terrorists Liveshots
now we can't send non-violent etc aid to some group just because some asshole in DC calls them a terrorist group?
So you think it should be ok to help terrorist?
The Constitution is not a suicide pact. Free speech doesn't include plotting to destroy the USA. Unless you're on our enemies side, which is quite possible if you're a Liberal, what part of that do you not understand?
From the article:
The HLP website:"...all contributions to foreign terrorist organizations--even those for seemingly benign purposes--further those groups' terrorist activities. The Humanitarian Law Project claimed the law violated its First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. The Courts ruling said that was not the case.
Humanitarian Law Project
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Looks like they don't care much for the US or the Constitution. [/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]The Humanitarian Law Project is a non-profit organization founded in 1985, dedicated to protecting human rights and promoting the peaceful resolution of conflict by using established international human rights laws and humanitarian law. Our long-term objectives are to strengthen human rights standards ratified by nations around the globe and to foster communication on compelling international human rights issues among human rights activists, law faculty and students, members of Congress and their staffs, as well as interested citizens.[/SIZE][/FONT]
The Constitution is not a suicide pact. Free speech doesn't include plotting to destroy the USA. Unless you're on our enemies side, which is quite possible if you're a Liberal, what part of that do you not understand?
From the article:
The HLP website:"...all contributions to foreign terrorist organizations--even those for seemingly benign purposes--further those groups' terrorist activities. The Humanitarian Law Project claimed the law violated its First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. The Courts ruling said that was not the case.
Humanitarian Law Project
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Looks like they don't care much for the US or the Constitution. [/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]The Humanitarian Law Project is a non-profit organization founded in 1985, dedicated to protecting human rights and promoting the peaceful resolution of conflict by using established international human rights laws and humanitarian law. Our long-term objectives are to strengthen human rights standards ratified by nations around the globe and to foster communication on compelling international human rights issues among human rights activists, law faculty and students, members of Congress and their staffs, as well as interested citizens.[/SIZE][/FONT]
If you are correct that free speech does not include anti government speech, then you should be able to point to the fact that every justice agrees with your position, and the decision is unanimous. Unfortunately for you, you cannot. This is one of the dumbest decisions ever handed down by the court.
will obama go to jail for sending money to gaza? will bush go to jail for help hezbollah? will oliver north go to jail for supporting the contras?
The Constitution is not a suicide pact. Free speech doesn't include plotting to destroy the USA. Unless you're on our enemies side, which is quite possible if you're a Liberal, what part of that do you not understand?
From the article:
The HLP website:
Humanitarian Law Project
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Looks like they don't care much for the US or the Constitution. [/SIZE][/FONT]
If you are correct that free speech does not include anti government speech, then you should be able to point to the fact that every justice agrees with your position, and the decision is unanimous. Unfortunately for you, you cannot. This is one of the dumbest decisions ever handed down by the court.
Section 3
Whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully make or convey false reports...with intent to interfere with the operation...of the military or naval forces of the United States...
or say or do anything...to an investor...with intent to obstruct the sale by the United States of bonds or other securities...
and whoever when the United States is at war, shall willfully cause or attempt to cause...insubordination... in the military or naval forces of the United States,
or shall willfully obstruct or attempt to obstruct the recruiting or enlistment services of the United States
and whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully utter, print, write or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States or the Constitution...or the military or naval forces of the United States, or the flag...
or shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any language intended to incite, provoke, or encourage resistance to the United States...
or shall willfully display the flag of any foreign enemy
or shall willfully by utterance, writing, printing, publication, or language spoken, urge...any curtailment of production in this country of any thing...necessary...to the prosecution of the war...
and whoever shall willfully advocate...the doing of any of the acts or things in this section enumerated...or favor the cause of any country with which the United States is at war...
shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or the imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both....
Section 4
When the United States is at war, the Postmaster General may, upon evidence...that any person...is using the mails in violation...of this Act, instruct the postmaster at any post office at which mail is received addressed to such person..to return to the postmaster at the office at which they were originally mailed all letters or other matter so addressed...
Sedition Act of 1918
will obama go to jail for sending money to gaza? will bush go to jail for help hezbollah? will oliver north go to jail for supporting the contras?
North, Poindexter, Reagan, and Bush, to name just a FEW should have gone to jail over the funding of the Contras, how that funding flooded American streets with coke, and the subsequent and racially motivated escalation of the "war" on drugs that followed THEIR illegal actions. NOT ONE of them went to jail, and they were the biggest dealers in the country.
Michael Agar, Addiction Research & Theory: The Story Of Crack: Towards A Theory Of Illicit Drug Trends. 27pFeb2003, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p3-29, retrieved May 15, 2010 from Empire State College - Login
Michelle Alexander, Mother Jones The New Jim Crow 8 March, 2010, This story first appeared on the Tom Dispatch website retrieved May 15, 2010 from The New Jim Crow | Mother Jones
Dan Baum, Criminal Justice Tunnel Vision, The War on Drugs, Twelve Years Later, ABA Journal, 1993, March retrieved May 15, 2010 from Empire State College - Login
Richard A Cloward and Francis Fox Priven "Keeping Labor Lean and Hungry." Nation, November 7, 1981: 466-467 accessed December 13, 2009 from Empire State College - Login, 466.
James D. Cockcroft, Latin America, History, Politics, and U.S. Policy Second Ed, Wadsworth USA 1996
Martin Gilens, Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy The University of Chicago Press, 1999
Holly Karibo. NEOAMERICANIST, Constructing an Image; Pregnant Women, Crack Cocaine, and the Media in American History, Originally published in the Vol. 2 no. 1 (Spring/Summer 2006) issue, retrieved May 15, 2010 from Constructing an Image - Karibo | NeoAmericanist
Lash, Jonathan, Katherine Gillman, and David Sheridan. A Season of Spoils; The Reagan Administration's Attack on the Environment, xi, 6, 27-29, 84-96, 131-142, 159, 164-171, 195-210, and 272.
Andrea Victoria Martinez, Minorities, Mothers And Their Children The True Victims Of The War On Drugs, retrieved May 15, 2010 from http://lawlib.wlu.edu/works/568-1.pdf
Robert Parry, Salon.com How John Kerry exposed the Contra-cocaine scandal, 25 October 2004, retrieved May 15, 2010 from How John Kerry exposed the Contra-cocaine scandal - Salon.com
Bradley R. Schiller, The Economics of Poverty and Discrimination Tenth Ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, NJ, US, 2008
Tony Whitehead, PhD, Marion Barry, the Incarceration Epidemic, and the Prison-to-Community Cultural Continuum in Washington, DC, CUSAG, The Cultural Systems Analysis Group, University of Maryland, retrieved May 15, 2010 from Powered by Google Docs
fuck marshall
High Court: Americans Cant Help Terrorists Liveshots
now we can't send non-violent etc aid to some group just because some asshole in DC calls them a terrorist group?
So you think it should be ok to help terrorist?
fuck marshall
High Court: Americans Cant Help Terrorists Liveshots
now we can't send non-violent etc aid to some group just because some asshole in DC calls them a terrorist group?
Fuck YOU.
Only retarded pussies aid terrorists, and NO, it's NOT subjective.
will obama go to jail for sending money to gaza? will bush go to jail for help hezbollah? will oliver north go to jail for supporting the contras?
North, Poindexter, Reagan, and Bush, to name just a FEW should have gone to jail over the funding of the Contras, how that funding flooded American streets with coke, and the subsequent and racially motivated escalation of the "war" on drugs that followed THEIR illegal actions. NOT ONE of them went to jail, and they were the biggest dealers in the country.
Michael Agar, Addiction Research & Theory: The Story Of Crack: Towards A Theory Of Illicit Drug Trends. 27pFeb2003, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p3-29, retrieved May 15, 2010 from Empire State College - Login
Michelle Alexander, Mother Jones The New Jim Crow 8 March, 2010, This story first appeared on the Tom Dispatch website retrieved May 15, 2010 from The New Jim Crow | Mother Jones
Dan Baum, Criminal Justice Tunnel Vision, The War on Drugs, Twelve Years Later, ABA Journal, 1993, March retrieved May 15, 2010 from Empire State College - Login
Richard A Cloward and Francis Fox Priven "Keeping Labor Lean and Hungry." Nation, November 7, 1981: 466-467 accessed December 13, 2009 from Empire State College - Login, 466.
James D. Cockcroft, Latin America, History, Politics, and U.S. Policy Second Ed, Wadsworth USA 1996
Martin Gilens, Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy The University of Chicago Press, 1999
Holly Karibo. NEOAMERICANIST, Constructing an Image; Pregnant Women, Crack Cocaine, and the Media in American History, Originally published in the Vol. 2 no. 1 (Spring/Summer 2006) issue, retrieved May 15, 2010 from Constructing an Image - Karibo | NeoAmericanist
Lash, Jonathan, Katherine Gillman, and David Sheridan. A Season of Spoils; The Reagan Administration's Attack on the Environment, xi, 6, 27-29, 84-96, 131-142, 159, 164-171, 195-210, and 272.
Andrea Victoria Martinez, Minorities, Mothers And Their Children The True Victims Of The War On Drugs, retrieved May 15, 2010 from http://lawlib.wlu.edu/works/568-1.pdf
Robert Parry, Salon.com How John Kerry exposed the Contra-cocaine scandal, 25 October 2004, retrieved May 15, 2010 from How John Kerry exposed the Contra-cocaine scandal - Salon.com
Bradley R. Schiller, The Economics of Poverty and Discrimination Tenth Ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, NJ, US, 2008
Tony Whitehead, PhD, Marion Barry, the Incarceration Epidemic, and the Prison-to-Community Cultural Continuum in Washington, DC, CUSAG, The Cultural Systems Analysis Group, University of Maryland, retrieved May 15, 2010 from Powered by Google Docs
Nope, no matter how many links to Radical Left-Wing Socialist and Communist papers you provide, you're still wrong.
Please feel free to leave the wackos and rejoin mainstream society whenever you feel up to it. Nutter.
The Constitution is not a suicide pact. Free speech doesn't include plotting to destroy the USA. Unless you're on our enemies side, which is quite possible if you're a Liberal, what part of that do you not understand?
From the article:
The HLP website:
Humanitarian Law Project
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Looks like they don't care much for the US or the Constitution. [/SIZE][/FONT]
If you are correct that free speech does not include anti government speech, then you should be able to point to the fact that every justice agrees with your position, and the decision is unanimous. Unfortunately for you, you cannot. This is one of the dumbest decisions ever handed down by the court.
Section 3
Whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully make or convey false reports...with intent to interfere with the operation...of the military or naval forces of the United States...
or say or do anything...to an investor...with intent to obstruct the sale by the United States of bonds or other securities...
and whoever when the United States is at war, shall willfully cause or attempt to cause...insubordination... in the military or naval forces of the United States,
or shall willfully obstruct or attempt to obstruct the recruiting or enlistment services of the United States
and whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully utter, print, write or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States or the Constitution...or the military or naval forces of the United States, or the flag...
or shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any language intended to incite, provoke, or encourage resistance to the United States...
or shall willfully display the flag of any foreign enemy
or shall willfully by utterance, writing, printing, publication, or language spoken, urge...any curtailment of production in this country of any thing...necessary...to the prosecution of the war...
and whoever shall willfully advocate...the doing of any of the acts or things in this section enumerated...or favor the cause of any country with which the United States is at war...
shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or the imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both....
Section 4
When the United States is at war, the Postmaster General may, upon evidence...that any person...is using the mails in violation...of this Act, instruct the postmaster at any post office at which mail is received addressed to such person..to return to the postmaster at the office at which they were originally mailed all letters or other matter so addressed...
Sedition Act of 1918
