The Queen of England got three cheers because above all else she is British first:
Video: Three cheers for the Queen: Royal family treated to flypast and gun salute - Telegraph
Michele Bachmann should get the same for standing up for this country. She nailed it good:
This could be the start of something big should she choose to take on a gigantic fight looking for a champion. The battlefield is clearly defined in these words:
Michele Bachmann has a great opportunity to ask Keith Ellison if Islam is a religion or a political movement? If Ellison answers “Religion” she has him by the short curlys. Ellison will have to explain why he violates his oath of office by defending a religion that advocates theocracy in direct violation of the First Amendment.
Obviously, Ellison will not say that Islam is a political movement because that would eliminate the tax exempt status every Islamic entity enjoys.
In addition, Bachmann has a duty to defend the Constitution as does Ellison; so maybe he owes an apology if not his resignation.
Finally, anything anti-America can usually be tied to the Democrats, and the Clintons in particular:
Ellison demands apology from Bachmann for Muslim Brotherhood claim
by Tom Scheck, Minnesota Public Radio
July 20, 2012
Ellison demands apology from Bachmann for Muslim Brotherhood claim | Minnesota Public Radio News
I never thought RINO McCain was bright enough to see the constitutional problem posed by Islam the religion and Islam the political movement, but why the hell is Boehner criticizing Bachmann? Is he as dumb as McCain? or is it that Ellison and American Muslims intimidate him?
Video: Three cheers for the Queen: Royal family treated to flypast and gun salute - Telegraph
Michele Bachmann should get the same for standing up for this country. She nailed it good:
U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison, a Democrat, is demanding that Republican U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann apologize for suggesting he has connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist political movement.
This could be the start of something big should she choose to take on a gigantic fight looking for a champion. The battlefield is clearly defined in these words:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; . . .
Michele Bachmann has a great opportunity to ask Keith Ellison if Islam is a religion or a political movement? If Ellison answers “Religion” she has him by the short curlys. Ellison will have to explain why he violates his oath of office by defending a religion that advocates theocracy in direct violation of the First Amendment.
Obviously, Ellison will not say that Islam is a political movement because that would eliminate the tax exempt status every Islamic entity enjoys.
In addition, Bachmann has a duty to defend the Constitution as does Ellison; so maybe he owes an apology if not his resignation.
Finally, anything anti-America can usually be tied to the Democrats, and the Clintons in particular:
Bachmann and four other congressional Republicans sent a letter to federal officials last month asking for an investigation of the Muslim Brotherhood's ties to the U.S. government.
Bachmann's suggestion that Huma Abedin, one of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's top aides, has connections to the organization has drawn criticism from leaders in both political parties, including Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. and Republican House Speaker John Boehner.
Ellison demands apology from Bachmann for Muslim Brotherhood claim
by Tom Scheck, Minnesota Public Radio
July 20, 2012
Ellison demands apology from Bachmann for Muslim Brotherhood claim | Minnesota Public Radio News
I never thought RINO McCain was bright enough to see the constitutional problem posed by Islam the religion and Islam the political movement, but why the hell is Boehner criticizing Bachmann? Is he as dumb as McCain? or is it that Ellison and American Muslims intimidate him?
Last edited: