ESay
Gold Member
- Mar 14, 2015
- 9,552
- 2,079
- 140
I repeat it once more that Peter doesn't refuse to pay taxes. He already pays them more than a hundred of Michaels.They have to learn to be grateful for the opportunity at all. If Peter wouldn´t have to pay the tax, there would be no infrastructure, ect. And even if Peter managed to get rich nevertheless, who stops Michael who is just underway to Peter´s mansion?I already said that Peter is a collective image, remember? There are thousands of Peters who produce various products from apps to socks.Peter and Michael´s employer thought they were smart but Peter´s app suddenly disappeared from the app store.At the first time your method will bring more money. But after a while, Peter will come to conclusion - why should I be a milch cow? And then he decides to formaly register his firm in say Malta where the taxes are much lower and that grants the citizenship in exchange of investments.I don´t think it is fair. Michaels 20K are barely enough to live in dignity, he pays enough indirect taxes already.Nonsense. You earn more, you pay higher taxes with the same rate.
Peter earns 3 millions and pays 20% in taxes, that means he pays 600 000 a year.
Michael earns 20 000 and pays 20% in taxes, that means he pays 400 a year.
Fair? I think yes.
Peter on the other hand swims in money and whether he pays 20 or 60 % - it has no impact on his lifestyle.
Your calculation earns 604K, my earns 1,8 million. Your calculation means that the state is drowning in debt, by the way.
So, your method will leave the state with 400 a year. And maybe even less, because Peters friend may decide to leave with him, and this friend happens to be Michael 's employer.