Media Bias, 2017 style

DGS49

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2012
15,580
12,849
2,415
Pittsburgh
The following is a compilation of "news stories" extracted from today's websites, mainly Yahoo:

“Here’s how spoiled Barron Trump Actually is and he is only 10”
"Trump draws much smaller inaugural crowd”
"Donald Trump’s Inauguration was a Gothic nightmare"
"National Park Service is slyly taunting Trump on Twitter" (NOTE: Not “President Trump,” “Trump”)
"Trump’s first executive action: cancel mortgage premium cuts"
"George Soros calls Trump a would-be dictator who is going to fail"
"There were a lot of empty seats along Trump’s parade route"
"Trump’s First Executive Orders: Attacks Obamacare, Raises Taxes"
"Former Reagan budget director warn of fiscal bloodbath"
"Why NBC News isn’t fake for questioning Trump job creation claims"
"Is this what we’ve come to America?" (bemoaning the Boos that greet ultra-partisan hack Chuck Schumer when he ascended the podium)

All are either lies, distortions, or non-news presented as news. There were no "neutral" or positive stories about Trump or any aspect of the inauguration, or his first actions as President.

This despite the fact that at least half the country is thrilled that he is taking office, and were more than satisfied with the proceeding of Inauguration Day.

Do you get it yet? Phony news, phony "journalism." It's why so few people are paying attention any more.
 
Their latest fecal bon-mot of Trump tossing the MLK bust out of the Oval Office is quite telling.
 
The mainstream media knew of Trump's Russian problems before the election... and hid the news.

Instead, they faked 24/7 outrage about Clintons' email servier.

That's right. The media covered up the fact that a candidate was owned by an enemy of the USA, and instead ran non-stop stories attacking the other candidate over literally nothing.

Yes, the 2016 election did show the most outrageous media bias in US history, and probably in all of world history, and it was all in favor of Trump.

Seriously. If the tables had been turned, do you think the media would _not_ have reported Clinton was owned by the Russians? I hope nobody embarrasses themselves by saying they wouldn't have. Quite the contrary. The whole media would have demanded jail time and execution, immediately.
 
17%2B-%2B1
 
The mainstream media knew of Trump's Russian problems before the election... and hid the news.

Instead, they faked 24/7 outrage about Clintons' email servier.

That's right. The media covered up the fact that a candidate was owned by an enemy of the USA, and instead ran non-stop stories attacking the other candidate over literally nothing.

Yes, the 2016 election did show the most outrageous media bias in US history, and probably in all of world history, and it was all in favor of Trump.

Seriously. If the tables had been turned, do you think the media would _not_ have reported Clinton was owned by the Russians? I hope nobody embarrasses themselves by saying they wouldn't have. Quite the contrary. The whole media would have demanded jail time and execution, immediately.
Liberals think this graphic is accurate. Is it any wonder they are uninformed?

Check out the sources listed as minimal partisan bias...LMFAO! Lefties get duped again.

kP4Yax1.png
 
The mainstream media knew of Trump's Russian problems before the election... and hid the news.

Instead, they faked 24/7 outrage about Clintons' email servier.

That's right. The media covered up the fact that a candidate was owned by an enemy of the USA, and instead ran non-stop stories attacking the other candidate over literally nothing.

Yes, the 2016 election did show the most outrageous media bias in US history, and probably in all of world history, and it was all in favor of Trump.

Seriously. If the tables had been turned, do you think the media would _not_ have reported Clinton was owned by the Russians? I hope nobody embarrasses themselves by saying they wouldn't have. Quite the contrary. The whole media would have demanded jail time and execution, immediately.
Liberals think this graphic is accurate. Is it any wonder they are uninformed?

Check out the sources listed as minimal partisan bias...LMFAO! Lefties get duped again.

kP4Yax1.png
Yep. Them butts they keep on hurtin'.
 
Where's the proof they're fake? And did you not just search and type the ones that were what you were looking for. Your post is biased.
 
Where's the proof they're fake? And did you not just search and type the ones that were what you were looking for. Your post is biased.
Ambitious Imbeciles Whom All of You Secretly Look Up To

And yet every Netwit critic of the media blindly copies their ignorant grammar. Anyone who doesn't use media itself as a plural should be disqualified from writing or broadcasting professionally. All those who parrot Diploma Dumbo English are still hooked on the Boob Tube and print media.

In our time, anyone who gets paid to write, broadcast, or lecture is of the same ilk as those who get paid to have sex.
 

Forum List

Back
Top