Maxine Waters: 'The Tea Party Can Go Straight To Hell'

When they get to KY they are most intolerant. Of course we know how to get them. Most of them don't know any better than to wear white before Easter and after Labor Day. So not only are they intolerant, they are also ignorant!!!! We have a great time making fun of them!

Your post's irony pleases me. :clap2::clap2::clap2:

No irony. Sunshine has not crowed about her tolerance.


True!

When did 'yankee' become a race? :cuckoo: Nuttin in the Constitution says I have to tolerate them!
 
Your stupidity is fuckin' comical......Your denials of the facts are bizarre.

So, the dem's target red states full of republcans, using targets as symoblos....Obviously targeting republicans and the politicians.

Palin puts crosshairs on dem districts, Using crosshairs as sybmols.....Obviously targeting those districts and the politicians.

Now, WHAT'S THE FUCKIN' DIFFERENCE?

And I suppose you're one of the ignorant lefty morons who think Palin's map had something to do with that crazy lefty fuck putting a bullet in Giffords brain, eh?
The difference is lefties with an irrational hatred for Palin really, really, really, really want her to be responsible...so she is.

That's what defines reality for them: Their desires.

That's what happens when you're driven solely by emotion.

You know the difference between targetting a person and targetting a state?

If you target a state, you're stating that you want to take that state over politically via elections.

If you target an individual, you are going after that one individual personally, whether it's for political or other reasons.

No, targeting a group of people is not the same as targeting an individual.
 
The difference is lefties with an irrational hatred for Palin really, really, really, really want her to be responsible...so she is.

That's what defines reality for them: Their desires.

That's what happens when you're driven solely by emotion.

You know the difference between targetting a person and targetting a state?

If you target a state, you're stating that you want to take that state over politically via elections.

If you target an individual, you are going after that one individual personally, whether it's for political or other reasons.

No, targeting a group of people is not the same as targeting an individual.
Yeah, ok!:cuckoo:

LMAO!

You lib's just don't have the capacity in your feeble minds to admit Jack Shit.

Don't have the capacity in your feeble minds to admit that Palin's map was in no way different then the dem's, and that her map had nothing to do with a crazy LEFTY blowing a hole in Giffords head.
 
The Dem map targeted states, not individuals.

When you target individuals, you're making it personal.
So, targeting a state made up primarily of repub individuals, is not the same as targeting a district made up of primarily democrat individuals?

Do you not understand how ridiculous both Bodey and yourself are making yourselves sound?

LMAO!:lol:........This is some of the most ridiculous, and funniest shit i've heard on this board......Seriously.
 
You know the difference between targetting a person and targetting a state?

If you target a state, you're stating that you want to take that state over politically via elections.

If you target an individual, you are going after that one individual personally, whether it's for political or other reasons.

No, targeting a group of people is not the same as targeting an individual.
Yeah, ok!:cuckoo:

LMAO!

You lib's just don't have the capacity in your feeble minds to admit Jack Shit.

Don't have the capacity in your feeble minds to admit that Palin's map was in no way different then the dem's, and that her map had nothing to do with a crazy LEFTY blowing a hole in Giffords head.

Palin's map targetting individual people...the Democrat map provided as a comparison targetted states.

But please feel free to continue to show us that you just don't get it.
 
The Dem map targeted states, not individuals.

When you target individuals, you're making it personal.
So, targeting a state made up primarily of repub individuals, is not the same as targeting a district made up of primarily democrat individuals?

Do you not understand how ridiculous both Bodey and yourself are making yourselves sound?

LMAO!:lol:........This is some of the most ridiculous, and funniest shit i've heard on this board......Seriously.

Wow...you keep moving those goal posts.

First you say that there are maps with democrats putting crosshairs on republicans....then you change that to saying that there are maps with democrats putting targets on republicans....then you change that to say that there are maps with democrats putting targets on states FULL of republicans....and now, you say targetting a state "made up primarly of repub individuals".

As for your question...if Palin had targetted a state...no beef. If she had targetted a district...no beef. However, she did not do that....she targetted INDIVIDUALS...with symbols used for shooting. Poor, poor choice....a choice that Democrat map makers were smart enough not to make.
 
If you target a state, you're stating that you want to take that state over politically via elections.

If you target an individual, you are going after that one individual personally, whether it's for political or other reasons.

No, targeting a group of people is not the same as targeting an individual.
Yeah, ok!:cuckoo:

LMAO!

You lib's just don't have the capacity in your feeble minds to admit Jack Shit.

Don't have the capacity in your feeble minds to admit that Palin's map was in no way different then the dem's, and that her map had nothing to do with a crazy LEFTY blowing a hole in Giffords head.

Palin's map targetting individual people...the Democrat map provided as a comparison targetted states.

But please feel free to continue to show us that you just don't get it.
Palin's map targeted districts......The dem's map targeted states.

No difference whatsoever, ya dumbass.:cuckoo:
 
Yeah, ok!:cuckoo:

LMAO!

You lib's just don't have the capacity in your feeble minds to admit Jack Shit.

Don't have the capacity in your feeble minds to admit that Palin's map was in no way different then the dem's, and that her map had nothing to do with a crazy LEFTY blowing a hole in Giffords head.

Palin's map targetting individual people...the Democrat map provided as a comparison targetted states.

But please feel free to continue to show us that you just don't get it.
Palin's map targeted districts......The dem's map targeted states.

No difference whatsoever, ya dumbass.:cuckoo:

Palin's map does NOT target districts...it targets individuals. If it had targetted districts, this would never have been an issue.

I'm adding this link because it shows the map with the accompanying comments.....names people, Wicked.

http://www.tmz.com/2011/01/08/sarah-palin-gabrielle-giffords-facebook-target-list-crosshairs-map/
 
Last edited:
The Dem map targeted states, not individuals.

When you target individuals, you're making it personal.
So, targeting a state made up primarily of repub individuals, is not the same as targeting a district made up of primarily democrat individuals?

Do you not understand how ridiculous both Bodey and yourself are making yourselves sound?

LMAO!:lol:........This is some of the most ridiculous, and funniest shit i've heard on this board......Seriously.

Wow...you keep moving those goal posts.

First you say that there are maps with democrats putting crosshairs on republicans....then you change that to saying that there are maps with democrats putting targets on republicans....then you change that to say that there are maps with democrats putting targets on states FULL of republicans....and now, you say targetting a state "made up primarly of repub individuals".

As for your question...if Palin had targetted a state...no beef. If she had targetted a district...no beef. However, she did not do that....she targetted INDIVIDUALS...with symbols used for shooting. Poor, poor choice....a choice that Democrat map makers were smart enough not to make.
I didn't move any goal posts, son.

Palin targeted dem districts, Dem's targeted repub states.......No different, dumbass.:cuckoo:

Have you always lived with your head buried firmly in your stink hole?

Why don't you just admit it. If Palin had targeted a state, you would be screaching at the moon about it also......For several simple reasons....Unlike you, she's attractive, successful, a great wife and mother, straight, and a conservative.
 
Actually Wicked Colon Jouster, if you target STATES, you're targeting a group of individiuals.

When you target specific districts, those districts are represented by just ONE person.

Target a district, you target the individual.

Try again ya retarded shithead.
 
Actually Wicked Colon Jouster, if you target STATES, you're targeting a group of individiuals.

When you target specific districts, those districts are represented by just ONE person.

Target a district, you target the individual.

Try again ya retarded shithead.
So, in your feeble mind:

Targeting GROUPS of individuals.....Good

Targeting one individual.........Bad

LMAO!:lol:

You fuckin' lib's are comical.

The hypocrisy of you loons is both bizarre and downright funny.:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top