Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
then just what were they looking for? just shitz-n-gigglz to see them post hate ad after hate ad? what they did is far more reaching than election and the people who keep on hating and blaming them are doing exactly what they wanted them to do.Really? What did the Russians do that changed your vote to Trump?
You still haven't answer the question. That makes you a typical hysterical libtard!
Your deflection has nothing to do with Russia's interference. Are you denying they interfered to help Trump win?
The Intelligence community you just mentioned found zero evidence that their efforts had any effect. So, you don't believe them about that, but swear by what else they claim?
No, actually, they did not. In fact, they expressly said they did not assess the impact of Russia's interference.
“We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,” an unclassified assessment released last January states. “The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.”Pence says intel community concluded Russia did not affect election
Wow! You don't even understand your own post!
I understood it fine. You made an inaccurate claim that the intelligence community said Russia's interference had no impact. The intelligence community did not assess the impact.
"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,”
She's a moron. She should be ridiculed. We need more videos made of her like this.Lol...from Berkeley no less..
Like we would believe a words those pricks would say?
Computer science and digital forensics expert Berkeley Hany Farid said there was "no question" the video had been tampered with.
A three-minute clip of Pelosi speaking event with the Center for American Progress from Wednesday was uploaded on Facebook by a group called "Politics WatchDog" was viewed over 1.8 million times with nearly 40,000 shares. The video shows her frequently slurring her words and her voice sounding garbled. Copies of the clip had also been found on Twitter and YouTube, which the latter had removed.
Really? What did the Russians do that changed your vote to Trump?
You still haven't answer the question. That makes you a typical hysterical libtard!
Your deflection has nothing to do with Russia's interference. Are you denying they interfered to help Trump win?
The Intelligence community you just mentioned found zero evidence that their efforts had any effect. So, you don't believe them about that, but swear by what else they claim?
No, actually, they did not. In fact, they expressly said they did not assess the impact of Russia's interference.
“We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,” an unclassified assessment released last January states. “The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.”Pence says intel community concluded Russia did not affect election
Wow! You don't even understand your own post!
I understood it fine. You made an inaccurate claim that the intelligence community said Russia's interference had no impact. The intelligence community did not assess the impact.
"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,”
Your deflection has nothing to do with Russia's interference. Are you denying they interfered to help Trump win?
The Intelligence community you just mentioned found zero evidence that their efforts had any effect. So, you don't believe them about that, but swear by what else they claim?
No, actually, they did not. In fact, they expressly said they did not assess the impact of Russia's interference.
“We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,” an unclassified assessment released last January states. “The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.”Pence says intel community concluded Russia did not affect election
Wow! You don't even understand your own post!
I understood it fine. You made an inaccurate claim that the intelligence community said Russia's interference had no impact. The intelligence community did not assess the impact.
"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,”
You cannot assess what does not exist. That is simple logic!
Can you point to a single vote that was changed because of their interference? No, you can't! The fact that you do not understand there was no impact is a testament to your own low IQ.
The Intelligence community you just mentioned found zero evidence that their efforts had any effect. So, you don't believe them about that, but swear by what else they claim?
No, actually, they did not. In fact, they expressly said they did not assess the impact of Russia's interference.
“We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,” an unclassified assessment released last January states. “The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.”Pence says intel community concluded Russia did not affect election
Wow! You don't even understand your own post!
I understood it fine. You made an inaccurate claim that the intelligence community said Russia's interference had no impact. The intelligence community did not assess the impact.
"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,”
You cannot assess what does not exist. That is simple logic!
Can you point to a single vote that was changed because of their interference? No, you can't! The fact that you do not understand there was no impact is a testament to your own low IQ.
And yet you did exactly that, tried to assess it by saying there was no impact. We don’t know, definitely, if Russia’s interference has an impact.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/01/how-russia-helped-to-swing-the-election-for-trump
Although the Senate hearings are still under way, the Intelligence Committee chairman, Richard Burr, a Republican, has already declared, “What we cannot do, however, is calculate the impact that foreign meddling and social media had on this election.”
But some people are trying to calculate the impact.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07GJM18PL/ref=nodl_?creativeASIN=B07GJM18PL&linkCode=w61&imprToken=SZn11AD8bNkwAt0vuX.pSw&slotNum=1&tag=thneyo0f-20
Quick question...do you believe political ads are effective?
No, actually, they did not. In fact, they expressly said they did not assess the impact of Russia's interference.
“We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,” an unclassified assessment released last January states. “The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.”Pence says intel community concluded Russia did not affect election
Wow! You don't even understand your own post!
I understood it fine. You made an inaccurate claim that the intelligence community said Russia's interference had no impact. The intelligence community did not assess the impact.
"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,”
You cannot assess what does not exist. That is simple logic!
Can you point to a single vote that was changed because of their interference? No, you can't! The fact that you do not understand there was no impact is a testament to your own low IQ.
And yet you did exactly that, tried to assess it by saying there was no impact. We don’t know, definitely, if Russia’s interference has an impact.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/01/how-russia-helped-to-swing-the-election-for-trump
Although the Senate hearings are still under way, the Intelligence Committee chairman, Richard Burr, a Republican, has already declared, “What we cannot do, however, is calculate the impact that foreign meddling and social media had on this election.”
But some people are trying to calculate the impact.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07GJM18PL/ref=nodl_?creativeASIN=B07GJM18PL&linkCode=w61&imprToken=SZn11AD8bNkwAt0vuX.pSw&slotNum=1&tag=thneyo0f-20
Quick question...do you believe political ads are effective?
No. Absolutely not. People with intelligence do not even bother with them.
The blind are leading the blind and you are a follower.
Wow! You don't even understand your own post!
I understood it fine. You made an inaccurate claim that the intelligence community said Russia's interference had no impact. The intelligence community did not assess the impact.
"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,”
You cannot assess what does not exist. That is simple logic!
Can you point to a single vote that was changed because of their interference? No, you can't! The fact that you do not understand there was no impact is a testament to your own low IQ.
And yet you did exactly that, tried to assess it by saying there was no impact. We don’t know, definitely, if Russia’s interference has an impact.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/01/how-russia-helped-to-swing-the-election-for-trump
Although the Senate hearings are still under way, the Intelligence Committee chairman, Richard Burr, a Republican, has already declared, “What we cannot do, however, is calculate the impact that foreign meddling and social media had on this election.”
But some people are trying to calculate the impact.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07GJM18PL/ref=nodl_?creativeASIN=B07GJM18PL&linkCode=w61&imprToken=SZn11AD8bNkwAt0vuX.pSw&slotNum=1&tag=thneyo0f-20
Quick question...do you believe political ads are effective?
No. Absolutely not. People with intelligence do not even bother with them.
The blind are leading the blind and you are a follower.
Yeah, that was the wrong question because you won't answer that one truthfully. The better question is do candidates and campaigns believe political advertising works? The answer is, of course, yes they do because they spend so much money on them. And there is a reason they spend that money...
Does negative political advertising actually work? New study says 'yes,' but it depends on whether you're a candidate or a PAC
I understood it fine. You made an inaccurate claim that the intelligence community said Russia's interference had no impact. The intelligence community did not assess the impact.
"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russia activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,”
You cannot assess what does not exist. That is simple logic!
Can you point to a single vote that was changed because of their interference? No, you can't! The fact that you do not understand there was no impact is a testament to your own low IQ.
And yet you did exactly that, tried to assess it by saying there was no impact. We don’t know, definitely, if Russia’s interference has an impact.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/01/how-russia-helped-to-swing-the-election-for-trump
Although the Senate hearings are still under way, the Intelligence Committee chairman, Richard Burr, a Republican, has already declared, “What we cannot do, however, is calculate the impact that foreign meddling and social media had on this election.”
But some people are trying to calculate the impact.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07GJM18PL/ref=nodl_?creativeASIN=B07GJM18PL&linkCode=w61&imprToken=SZn11AD8bNkwAt0vuX.pSw&slotNum=1&tag=thneyo0f-20
Quick question...do you believe political ads are effective?
No. Absolutely not. People with intelligence do not even bother with them.
The blind are leading the blind and you are a follower.
Yeah, that was the wrong question because you won't answer that one truthfully. The better question is do candidates and campaigns believe political advertising works? The answer is, of course, yes they do because they spend so much money on them. And there is a reason they spend that money...
Does negative political advertising actually work? New study says 'yes,' but it depends on whether you're a candidate or a PAC
You asked the question, and I answered it. I can't help if you cannot process the information. You are apparently terminally stupid. Your own post is telling evidence that you are a partisan hack and unable to understand that.
