Main Stream Media (Good Morning America) praises 11 year old drag queen stripping at gay strip bar.

[Timmy]

What the friggety fuck does "Liberals" have to do with anything in your OP?


Hm?

How many conservatives you know of support something like this?

I can't think of a single one.

The question wasn't for you, however it's not an answer anyway. Nobody said this was a political thing. Not even the OP said that. Nor does his link. Nor does his video.

Same answer you'd get from any conservative. Take it or leave it.

Left.

I get it --- you're "conserving" a valid answer by not having one. Well, that's efficient.

It was a perfectly valid answer. No conservative I know of would support this kind of perversion. But you are a liberal, therefore you support it.

It wasn't we conservatives who fought tooth and nail for allowing transsexuals to enter any bathroom they wanted, that you you liberals.

It wasn't we conservatives who condone same-sex marriages, that was you liberals.

It wasn't we conservatives who wanted gays and transsexuals in the military, that was you liberals.

It wasn't we conservatives who wanted the ACA to pay for sex change operations, that was you liberals.

Homosexuality, intersexuality, and transsexualism are a liberal political issue. They have insisted on making it such. Therefore the thread is in the political category.

Any other questions?

You are right . Conservatives are against freedom.

 

[Pogo]

Earlier this month, just three days after the Democrats took back the U.S. House in the midterms, ABC's "Good Morning America" (GMA) promoted a child drag queen named Desmond Napoles, a 10-year-old prepubescent boy who dresses up as a woman.

Desmond identifies as a same-sex attracted "androgynous drag kid" who developed an affection for women's clothing at age six. When his parents showed concern, a "therapist" told them to let Desmond simply "explore" himself. According to LifeSiteNews, he became a celebrity in the LGBT community after appearing in a music video by RuPaul and Jinkx in 2014.

WATCH: 'Good Morning America' Promotes Child Drag Queen

Do you hate liberals yet?

What the friggety fuck does "Liberals" have to do with anything in your OP?


Hm?

Still waiting for an explanation of why this thread was created in "Politics".

Still not getting one.

Isn’t everything related to politics these days, whether it is or isn’t? That’s how the news stations pitt people against each other.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's certainly how some wags here roll.
That's why I call out the invalidity of it. And as demonstrated they have no answer.

They have some kind of Dichotomy Disease, where everything that exists in the universe is made up of either "Democrat" atoms or "Republican" atoms. Kind of pathetic.

 

[depotoo]

The GMA interview the DailyWire article cited was in early November. They later posted an article saying that this kid had danced (not stripped) at a gay bar on Dec. 1st. The OP's thread title was completely misleading, as his GMA appearance was a month before the gay bar incident, and not even the DailyWire article is claiming he stripped there.

He has a video on YouTube performing at the Oasis Gay club, in SF, from 2 months ago. That was before his interview on gma. So no excuse.

OASIS

 

[Moonglow]

Earlier this month, just three days after the Democrats took back the U.S. House in the midterms, ABC's "Good Morning America" (GMA) promoted a child drag queen named Desmond Napoles, a 10-year-old prepubescent boy who dresses up as a woman.

Desmond identifies as a same-sex attracted "androgynous drag kid" who developed an affection for women's clothing at age six. When his parents showed concern, a "therapist" told them to let Desmond simply "explore" himself. According to LifeSiteNews, he became a celebrity in the LGBT community after appearing in a music video by RuPaul and Jinkx in 2014.

WATCH: 'Good Morning America' Promotes Child Drag Queen

Do you hate liberals yet?

Being gay was caused by liberalism? I doubt very seriously not.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Ummm...................not for nothing, but in the OP's post it says that the kid appeared in a VIDEO that was done by RuPaul.

No. The child was not stripping in a club for money. It was a video, and while it might have been in poor taste, it was just a video and the child was not harmed.

I mean...............have you seen some of the other videos out there? Some are pretty freaking strange and wild.

And yes, children have appeared in some of them, and were highly sexualized in the video. Anyone remember the band Bow Wow Wow and their song "I Want Candy"? Anabella Lwin who was the lead singer for that video was only 13.

Here...................watch the video yourself, and then tell me they didn't sexualize her......................

 

[Pogo]

Ummm...................not for nothing, but in the OP's post it says that the kid appeared in a VIDEO that was done by RuPaul.

No. The child was not stripping in a club for money. It was a video, and while it might have been in poor taste, it was just a video and the child was not harmed.

I mean...............have you seen some of the other videos out there? Some are pretty freaking strange and wild.

And yes, children have appeared in some of them, and were highly sexualized in the video. Anyone remember the band Bow Wow Wow and their song "I Want Candy"? Anabella Lwin who was the lead singer for that video was only 13.

Here...................watch the video yourself, and then tell me they didn't sexualize her......................

Geez. Gods save us from remakes....

​

 

[ABikerSailor]

Ummm...................not for nothing, but in the OP's post it says that the kid appeared in a VIDEO that was done by RuPaul.

No. The child was not stripping in a club for money. It was a video, and while it might have been in poor taste, it was just a video and the child was not harmed.

I mean...............have you seen some of the other videos out there? Some are pretty freaking strange and wild.

And yes, children have appeared in some of them, and were highly sexualized in the video. Anyone remember the band Bow Wow Wow and their song "I Want Candy"? Anabella Lwin who was the lead singer for that video was only 13.

Here...................watch the video yourself, and then tell me they didn't sexualize her......................

Geez. Gods save us from remakes....

​

I hear ya, but the point wasn't about the song being remade. The point was that they made a video with a 13 year old girl who wasn't wearing anything other than a thin t-shirt with bikini bottoms, and she was bouncing and prancing in a very sexual way. I mean for crying out loud, the video starts with her in a wet t-shirt coming out of the surf.

 

[depotoo]

Ummm...................not for nothing, but in the OP's post it says that the kid appeared in a VIDEO that was done by RuPaul.

No. The child was not stripping in a club for money. It was a video, and while it might have been in poor taste, it was just a video and the child was not harmed.

I mean...............have you seen some of the other videos out there? Some are pretty freaking strange and wild.

And yes, children have appeared in some of them, and were highly sexualized in the video. Anyone remember the band Bow Wow Wow and their song "I Want Candy"? Anabella Lwin who was the lead singer for that video was only 13.

Here...................watch the video yourself, and then tell me they didn't sexualize her......................

Here he is again, and no one said he was stripping, but money was given to him by the men and he shouldn’t be performing at 10 or 11 in any bar. Nor should any young girl. Period.

 

[JGalt]

How many conservatives you know of support something like this?

I can't think of a single one.

The question wasn't for you, however it's not an answer anyway. Nobody said this was a political thing. Not even the OP said that. Nor does his link. Nor does his video.

Same answer you'd get from any conservative. Take it or leave it.

Left.

I get it --- you're "conserving" a valid answer by not having one. Well, that's efficient.

It was a perfectly valid answer. No conservative I know of would support this kind of perversion. But you are a liberal, therefore you support it.

Actually I offered no opinion at all. You just pulled that out of your ass and plugged it in. Go learn how to read.

What I did do was question where any political content is. Nowhere in the OP's link is there any allusion to politics. Nowhere does any form of the word "Liberal" appear. He plugged that in just like you plugged in the above.

So it *STILL* fails to address that question.

So does the OP, who simply ran away rather than defend himself.

So I got no answer from either of you wankballs. Nor did I expect one.
That's why I put the question out there in the first place --- to watch some idiot try to make pretzels. And there you are jumping all over the bait. Aren't you.

It wasn't we conservatives who fought tooth and nail for allowing transsexuals to enter any bathroom they wanted, that you you liberals.

Again, I offered no opinion on that either.

Go ahead, prove me wrong and show a quote. Whatcha got?

It wasn't we conservatives who condone same-sex marriages, that was you liberals.

Again --- link?

Again --- of course no link.

It wasn't we conservatives who wanted gays and transsexuals in the military, that was you liberals.

Third time's the charm. Link this too.

It wasn't we conservatives who wanted the ACA to pay for sex change operations, that was you liberals.

Any other questions?

Yep. Where are your links?
Looks like you owe me four from this post alone.

**********NONE*********** of the above addresses the fucking question of where the political content is, or why this thread is in the Politics forum.

When one hears of a disgusting story like this, the general tendency is to associate it with Democrat and their polices.

But I'll give you a freebie: I looked up "her" parent's voter info: They are not politically registered as anything.

 

[depotoo]

At 3 dollar bill in Brooklyn

His mother is booking shows for him, to profit, and is exploiting him. No way anyone can say otherwise.
3 Dollar Bill Presents: "CLUB WHOA!" feat: DESMOND IS AMAZING LIVE!!!

 

[aaronleland]

Ummm...................not for nothing, but in the OP's post it says that the kid appeared in a VIDEO that was done by RuPaul.

No. The child was not stripping in a club for money. It was a video, and while it might have been in poor taste, it was just a video and the child was not harmed.

I mean...............have you seen some of the other videos out there? Some are pretty freaking strange and wild.

And yes, children have appeared in some of them, and were highly sexualized in the video. Anyone remember the band Bow Wow Wow and their song "I Want Candy"? Anabella Lwin who was the lead singer for that video was only 13.

Here...................watch the video yourself, and then tell me they didn't sexualize her......................

Unfortunately children have been sexualized in the media for many years. I remember when I was a kid little girls would read Teen Beat magazine. It was a magazine full of "teen idols" for little girls and old perverts to salivate over. Is it any wonder Corey Haim was taking it in the shitter?

 

[JGalt]

How many conservatives you know of support something like this?

I can't think of a single one.

The question wasn't for you, however it's not an answer anyway. Nobody said this was a political thing. Not even the OP said that. Nor does his link. Nor does his video.

Same answer you'd get from any conservative. Take it or leave it.

Left.

I get it --- you're "conserving" a valid answer by not having one. Well, that's efficient.

It was a perfectly valid answer. No conservative I know of would support this kind of perversion. But you are a liberal, therefore you support it.

It wasn't we conservatives who fought tooth and nail for allowing transsexuals to enter any bathroom they wanted, that you you liberals.

It wasn't we conservatives who condone same-sex marriages, that was you liberals.

It wasn't we conservatives who wanted gays and transsexuals in the military, that was you liberals.

It wasn't we conservatives who wanted the ACA to pay for sex change operations, that was you liberals.

Homosexuality, intersexuality, and transsexualism are a liberal political issue. They have insisted on making it such. Therefore the thread is in the political category.

Any other questions?

You are right . Conservatives are against freedom.

You don't have the "freedom" to pimp out your children as gay sex objects. The child is an American citizen and conservatives believe that the primary purpose of government is to protect its citizens.

 

[Pogo]

Ummm...................not for nothing, but in the OP's post it says that the kid appeared in a VIDEO that was done by RuPaul.

No. The child was not stripping in a club for money. It was a video, and while it might have been in poor taste, it was just a video and the child was not harmed.

I mean...............have you seen some of the other videos out there? Some are pretty freaking strange and wild.

And yes, children have appeared in some of them, and were highly sexualized in the video. Anyone remember the band Bow Wow Wow and their song "I Want Candy"? Anabella Lwin who was the lead singer for that video was only 13.

Here...................watch the video yourself, and then tell me they didn't sexualize her......................

Geez. Gods save us from remakes....

​

I hear ya, but the point wasn't about the song being remade. The point was that they made a video with a 13 year old girl who wasn't wearing anything other than a thin t-shirt with bikini bottoms, and she was bouncing and prancing in a very sexual way. I mean for crying out loud, the video starts with her in a wet t-shirt coming out of the surf.

Yeah I know but fun fact -- the original apparently was also made about a 13-year-old beach dancer.....

I believe the original was made by "The Liburruls". Just ask the OP.

 

[Pogo]

The question wasn't for you, however it's not an answer anyway. Nobody said this was a political thing. Not even the OP said that. Nor does his link. Nor does his video.

Same answer you'd get from any conservative. Take it or leave it.

Left.

I get it --- you're "conserving" a valid answer by not having one. Well, that's efficient.

It was a perfectly valid answer. No conservative I know of would support this kind of perversion. But you are a liberal, therefore you support it.

Actually I offered no opinion at all. You just pulled that out of your ass and plugged it in. Go learn how to read.

What I did do was question where any political content is. Nowhere in the OP's link is there any allusion to politics. Nowhere does any form of the word "Liberal" appear. He plugged that in just like you plugged in the above.

So it *STILL* fails to address that question.

So does the OP, who simply ran away rather than defend himself.

So I got no answer from either of you wankballs. Nor did I expect one.
That's why I put the question out there in the first place --- to watch some idiot try to make pretzels. And there you are jumping all over the bait. Aren't you.

It wasn't we conservatives who fought tooth and nail for allowing transsexuals to enter any bathroom they wanted, that you you liberals.

Again, I offered no opinion on that either.

Go ahead, prove me wrong and show a quote. Whatcha got?

It wasn't we conservatives who condone same-sex marriages, that was you liberals.

Again --- link?

Again --- of course no link.

It wasn't we conservatives who wanted gays and transsexuals in the military, that was you liberals.

Third time's the charm. Link this too.

It wasn't we conservatives who wanted the ACA to pay for sex change operations, that was you liberals.

Any other questions?

Yep. Where are your links?
Looks like you owe me four from this post alone.

**********NONE*********** of the above addresses the fucking question of where the political content is, or why this thread is in the Politics forum.

When one hears of a disgusting story like this, the general tendency is to associate it with Democrat and their polices.

"The" general tendency?

You mean "YOUR" genital tendency. Besides which, nobody, not even the OP, brought up "Democrat [sic] and their policies". There ARE NO policies in play here. Actually the OP brought up "Liberals".

----------- Or are you suggesting the heavy hand of The State must step in here?

But I'll give you a freebie: I looked up "her" parent's voter info: They are not politically registered as anything.

WHUUUUUUUUUUUUT? You mean to suggest the entire universe ISN'T made up of "Democrat atoms" and "Republican atoms"???? You mean to tell us there are things that have nothing to do with politics???? WHO KNEW??

Stupid shit.....


Sooooooo what exactly were you going to do with this "parents voter info" you went snooping for, if you found any?

 

[my2¢]

Thanks for warning. And here I thought the Today Show was the bottom of the barrel in the morning.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

Why is an eleven year old even allowed into such a place when you normally have to be 18 or older in order to get into a bar?

God bless you always!!!

Holly