1. A wise wonk one posited that, for Liberals, feeling passes for knowing.
That succinct statement explains why the Democrats/Liberals offer cures that are known not to be effective, and why they will subscribe to every fabrication their leaders advance.
One is puzzled by how easily the drones will shut their eyes, ears and minds to clearly documented facts. Must be attributable to the training in government school.
2. Here are two facts that should inform the debate:
a."Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950ās through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows
b. "From 1994 through 2004, a federal ban on āassault weaponsā was in place, and it had no detectable effect on crime.
We have a unique advantage in judging calls for a ban on so-called assault weapons: Weāve done it before. From 1994 through 2004, a federal ban on āassault weaponsā was in place, and it had no detectable effect on crime. The independent Task Force on Community Preventative Services found no evidence that the assault-weapon ban prevented any violence. The National Research Councilās review of the academic literature on the question found that the data ādid not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence.ā The Justice Departmentās own study suggested that any effects of the law were too small to be statistically measured. Indeed, the only statistically significant outcome that could be detected was a steep rise in prices for various firearms that werenāt banned. Political realities being what they are, it is no surprise that Smith & Wesson shares went up almost 7 percent after the Orlando murders."
Assault-Weapon Ban: No | National Review
3. Scholars have studied the issue, and proven....PROVEN....that a possible response is totally the reverse of the solutions offered by the collectivists.
Since the above is undeniable, irrefutable,....if facts, experience and reality is to be the basis of any 'solution'.....
....I'm betting that there will be no Democrat, Leftist, Liberal, will be able to offer any solution to what all of us would like to see solved.
That succinct statement explains why the Democrats/Liberals offer cures that are known not to be effective, and why they will subscribe to every fabrication their leaders advance.
One is puzzled by how easily the drones will shut their eyes, ears and minds to clearly documented facts. Must be attributable to the training in government school.
2. Here are two facts that should inform the debate:
a."Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950ās through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows
b. "From 1994 through 2004, a federal ban on āassault weaponsā was in place, and it had no detectable effect on crime.
We have a unique advantage in judging calls for a ban on so-called assault weapons: Weāve done it before. From 1994 through 2004, a federal ban on āassault weaponsā was in place, and it had no detectable effect on crime. The independent Task Force on Community Preventative Services found no evidence that the assault-weapon ban prevented any violence. The National Research Councilās review of the academic literature on the question found that the data ādid not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence.ā The Justice Departmentās own study suggested that any effects of the law were too small to be statistically measured. Indeed, the only statistically significant outcome that could be detected was a steep rise in prices for various firearms that werenāt banned. Political realities being what they are, it is no surprise that Smith & Wesson shares went up almost 7 percent after the Orlando murders."
Assault-Weapon Ban: No | National Review
3. Scholars have studied the issue, and proven....PROVEN....that a possible response is totally the reverse of the solutions offered by the collectivists.
Since the above is undeniable, irrefutable,....if facts, experience and reality is to be the basis of any 'solution'.....
....I'm betting that there will be no Democrat, Leftist, Liberal, will be able to offer any solution to what all of us would like to see solved.