Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hardly.
Lying requires prior knowledge.
Ohhh you are saying she is stupid then.
Why don't you watch her show sometime?
You might learn something.
The people at FoxLies know they are lying, except maybe for Michelle Malkin who is just bat shit crazy.
And your posts are nothing but moronic.Which means that you lie here on a daily basis.Hardly.
Lying requires prior knowledge.
And your posts are nothing but moronic insults.
then they fit you, because you are a moronWhich means that you lie here on a daily basis.Hardly.
Lying requires prior knowledge.
And your posts are nothing but moronic insults.
did you watch the video, peabrain?If johnny dollar's place says it, it must be Pulitzer prize journalism
Rachel is head and shoulders above most of the journalists out there...including Olbermann.
Very bright girl...
Rachel is head and shoulders above most of the journalists out there...including Olbermann.
Very bright girl...
did you watch the video, peabrain?If johnny dollar's place says it, it must be Pulitzer prize journalism
i watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?
and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE
no, you were WRONG, as usuali watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?
and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE
I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.
There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.
When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.
i watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?
and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE
I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.
There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.
When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.
i watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?
and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE
I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.
There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.
When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.
why would anyone be too fearful to watch her?
i watched it, fucktardI watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.
There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.
When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.
why would anyone be too fearful to watch her?
Ask neg reppin' dive.
no, you were WRONG, as usuali watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?
and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE
I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.
There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.
When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.
and you give HER a pass for what you just said was wrong
fuck off you pathetic hypocrite
bfgrn?I am beginning to believe Maddow post here.
sorry i dont meet your pathetic standards on hereno, you were WRONG, as usualI watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.
There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.
When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.
and you give HER a pass for what you just said was wrong
fuck off you pathetic hypocrite
Try not to overwhelm me with your literary acumen. Please keep it down to something smaller than War & Peace.
I apologize, your literary skills were probably stunted by that mean liberal 9th grade teacher who greeted you with 'nice TOOTH'
bfgrn?I am beginning to believe Maddow post here.