Love It: Lawsuit Filed On Democratic Party For Them To Define If Obama Is Qualified

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by USArmyRetired, Oct 28, 2011.

  1. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +345
    What a brilliant serious tactic by the Liberty Legal Foundation and Presidential Candidate John Dummett filing these multiple suits and they will have to be answered. This is a maneuver designed not to go directly at Obama by name but instead the National Democratic Party and the Democratic National Committee for them to confirm what a natural born Citizen is before they put a candidate on the Presidential ballot for 2012. The lawsuits were both filed in Arizona at the State and Federal Level. This is to make sure the candidate is indeed a natural born Citizen and not a Citizen and qualified to meet Article 2 Section 1. I remember that Alan Keyes filed suit directly against Obama but it was after the election and it was dismissed because the Judge stated that if he had filed it during the campaign as a candidate, then he would have had standing to challenge Obama's eligibility. You see, it was discovered after Obama was sworn in that the Official Certification Of Nomination Forms by the Democratic National Committe and the Democratic National Party of Hawaii failed to explicitly include the language required by law in HRS 11-113(c)(1)(B) stating that Obama was legally qualified as a natural born Citizen under the Constitution. The legal wording was included in Clinton, Gore and Kerry's forms when they ran for president.


    Lawsuits seeking to stop Democrats from certifying candidate's qualified
    Obama's 2012 run to be non-starter?

    Just when the White House probably thought those pesky lawsuits seeking a court determination that Barack Obama fails to meet the Constitution's eligibility requirements for a president were finished, something new has appeared on the horizon.

    Or in this case, the court docket.

    The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed a pair of lawsuits in state and federal courts that don't ask anything about Obama's birth or for any determination from the court about his eligibility. Or his birth certificate, for that matter.

    Instead, they name the national Democratic Party as a defendant, and ask the court to enjoin officials there from certifying that Obama is eligible for the office for the 2012 election.

    "This complaint does not request or require this court to find that President Obama is not qualified to hold the office of president of the United States. Instead, this complaint is directed toward defining the term 'natural-born citizen' under the Constitution of the United States, and toward negligence or intentional misrepresentations of the Democratic Party.

    Another Article Here:

    Breaking: Liberty Legal Foundation and Presidential Candidate John Dummett File Multiple Eligibility Lawsuits Against Barack Hussein Obama| The Post & Email

    Important Points:
    ■Lawsuit asks court to enjoin National Democratic Party from certifying Obama as Constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President


    ■Lack of certification by Democratic Party would prevent Obama from appearing on the ballot in the 2012 general election


    ■Lawsuit asks court to confirm Supreme Court’s definition of “natural-born citizen” as having two parents that are BOTH U.S. citizens at time of birth. See Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875).


    ■Obama’s place of birth and birth certificate are irrelevant and not discussed


    Exerpt of Text:

    lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined “natural-born citizen” as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant.

    Despite numerous legal challenges, no lawsuit to date has been able to get a hearing on the merits related to Obama’s natural-born status. LLF has studied all of these cases in order learn from the rulings and avoid the pitfalls that stopped those lawsuits. LLF has learned that all states rely upon the truthfulness of representations made by the political parties, that their candidates are qualified to hold the federal office for which they are nominated. By naming the National Democratic Party as the defendant LLF not only targets the entity responsible for vetting the Democratic candidate, LLF also avoids taking on any state or federal government. The Democratic Party is a private entity, without any government immunities or government procedural advantages.

    LLF also learned that Presidential candidates that are registered with the Federal Election Commission have standing to ask a court to keep another candidate off the ballot. Consequently LLF partnered with FEC-registered Presidential Candidate John Dummett. Mr. Dummett is a conservative Republican who believes that the Constitution should be followed.

    Because LLF has a lead plaintiff that is a Presidential Candidate, and because that plaintiff is also a Liberty Legal member, Liberty Legal has standing to sue as well. If one plaintiff has standing to sue, all plaintiffs have standing to sue.



    Copies of the filed complaints are attached to this release.

    Dated: 10/26/11
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2011
  2. Matthew
    Offline

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    27,723
    Thanks Received:
    1,835
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +2,174
    Good.
  3. Rinata
    Offline

    Rinata VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    6,769
    Thanks Received:
    950
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Ratings:
    +955
    This will happen the same way you thought Palin would be president. You're pathetic.
  4. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,817
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,817
    anything in there about sarah gangbanging the darkies?
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4
  5. elvis
    Offline

    elvis BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,882
    Thanks Received:
    4,302
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4,302
    :rofl:
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  6. Matthew
    Offline

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    27,723
    Thanks Received:
    1,835
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +2,174
    High chance of aids and murder...I wouldn't trust anyone near power that has no sense of the world around them.
  7. Leweman
    Offline

    Leweman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,653
    Thanks Received:
    438
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +439
    Well everyone knows Obama isn't qualified to be President but that doesn't mean hes not a natural born citizen. The fact that the media stood idly by without questioning his qualifications and inexperience or vetting him one bit says a lot about journalism in America today. There will never be a situation again where we as a country can say that a person is not qualified or experienced enough to be President. It's pretty sad.
  8. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +345
    Based on what legal analysis? Elaborate in detail Rinata.
  9. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,817
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,817
    do you think sarah takes it up the butt?

    seriously
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Lakhota
    Offline

    Lakhota Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    25,619
    Thanks Received:
    1,333
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +1,551
    [​IMG]
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  11. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +345
    It's clearly amazing that the liberals on this board lack the intellectual capacity to discuss this situation about the Democratic Party and Legal Foundation. It is truly a sign that liberals have no insight into how to discuss anything of importance in a rational logical manner. Michael Savage is right, Liberalism is indeed a disease of the brain.
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2011
  12. Lakhota
    Offline

    Lakhota Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    25,619
    Thanks Received:
    1,333
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +1,551
    [​IMG]

    That's funny coming from a racist retard like you.
  13. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +345
    Racism is irrelevant in this Legal Foundation case. Discuss the case. Tell me about how the democratic party will handle it and why?
  14. Lakhota
    Offline

    Lakhota Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    25,619
    Thanks Received:
    1,333
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +1,551
    On behalf of Obama, I sincerely thank you for keeping this wingnut insanity alive!
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  15. SAT
    Offline

    SAT BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2011
    Messages:
    830
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +43
    Yeah, that's it. :lol:
  16. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +345
    What do you think about the DNC leaving out statute HRS 11-113(c)(1)(B) on Obama's OCON form?
  17. J.E.D
    Online

    J.E.D What's tha matta?

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2011
    Messages:
    9,307
    Thanks Received:
    1,492
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Ratings:
    +1,550
    What's sad is that you think it's up to the media to vet presidential candidates. It's up to you. Obama won by a clear majority. Apparently, the millions who voted for him think he's qualified. Better luck next time, sore loser.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  18. Lakhota
    Offline

    Lakhota Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    25,619
    Thanks Received:
    1,333
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +1,551
    I think it was a good idea.
  19. elvis
    Offline

    elvis BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,882
    Thanks Received:
    4,302
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4,302
    he meant to say COON form.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  20. Rat in the Hat
    Offline

    Rat in the Hat VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,815
    Thanks Received:
    4,992
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +4,992
    What does John Dummett think about Sawah sleeping with Glen Rice??
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page