Looks Like 'Threads' is Giving Twitter Competition

[Lastamender]

You’d know.

Gators live in the sewers, I guess you forgot.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

"Threads" has already won the censorship contest.

Musk is the king of censorship

 

[Lastamender]

Musk is the king of censorship

Then Zuckerberg is the queen.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

RUH ROH!!

Dirty Zuckerberg's "Threads" Platform Sees 70% Decline in Active Users in Just One Week | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft | 2

The excitement over Mark Zuckerberg’s “Threads” platform did not last long.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Womp, womp.

 

[BlueGin]

Link?


He fired useless twats that love censorship.

Threads is going to be a Dem run propaganda app.

And that refused to go into work and when they did…came for the freebies and to play instead of work.

 

[BlueGin]

Threads is accepting ALL bots....
Which is the majority of its "users".

It's not people....
Then there's the "automatic " integration of those who have an Instagram account. Even inactive Instagram accounts are being given a Threads account.

So....I don't believe the numbers Zuckerberg is touting to be actual users or people.

One laptop can create thousands of accounts in a day.

Hmmm. Wonder if they gave me an automatic acct. I should check that out. Wonder if they can be deleted?

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Hmmm. Wonder if they gave me an automatic acct. I should check that out. Wonder if they can be deleted?

Word is if you get banned from Threads, you automatically lose your Instragram account.

That dumb bitch Taylor Lorenz has been crying about it because she got two strikes on Threads and was more worried about losing her Insta.

Fortunately, having neither garbage platform as an outlet, I'm immune.

 

[BlueGin]

Word is if you get banned from Threads, you automatically lose your Instragram account.

That dumb bitch Taylor Lorenz has been crying about it because she got two strikes on Threads and was more worried about losing her Insta.

Fortunately, having neither garbage platform as an outlet, I'm immune.

I have Instagram only because one of my kids posts their art there. Otherwise I never use it. Oh well. It can sit dormant I guess.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

I have Instagram only because one of my kids posts their art there. Otherwise I never use it. Oh well. It can sit dormant I guess.

Bottom line is, Threads is already an utter failure - and the Left is wrong, yet again.

 

[BlueGin]

Bottom line is, Threads is already an utter failure - and the Left is wrong, yet again.

Apparently no one wants to sit in an echo chamber of perpetually offended whiney douche bags.

 

[JohnDB]

Threads has lost over 50% of its active users already. Meaning people have gone once and never returned. And it's getting worse than that.
Only 25% are even somewhat active users....meaning one to two visits per WEEK.
And then figuring in a 70% bot ratio of bots to actual people.....

Threads is a massive failure.

Even being overly generous by claiming bots are people you have less than 10% of the "people" that Twitter has. (And Twitter kicked off the majority of bots)

Twitter is being profitable...is having profit sharing with content creators. Also has fewer content moderators. (Meaning you can cuss and have an opinion)

I haven't seen any adult porn yet....haven't exactly searched for it but usually they target men and I'm definitely a guy with my preferences. So the claims that it's there must be bogus.

 

[Shareprofit]

"Threads" has already won the censorship contest.

That's how it should be. We don't need Trumptards lying on social media sites.

 

[Shareprofit]

Apparently no one wants to sit in an echo chamber of perpetually offended whiney douche bags.

I'm on it and it's great, no boring Trump victimhood bull shit and lies.

 

[Lastamender]

That's how it should be. We don't need Trumptards lying on social media sites.

It is better that people you agree with do the lying?

 

[JohnDB]