SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
And again you ASSUME....LOLFunny;
Tell me, Do you believe your failed models? Why?
Where do you teach people about AGW lies? Certainly not a legitimate scientific institution. Are you talking about your beer club or something?
I am not as stupid as you are... Please get back to topic. Tell me, do you believe your failed modeling? Why do you believe it?
I don't think you teach anybody about climate science. You should go do some research and listen to what actual scientists have to say about the topic.
Yet you never address the facts I presented you? Now why would that be? So interested in my personal endevours and not so interested in the facts you refuse to address.
Are you simply a left wing hack who is set on finding me and trying to use force an fear to shut me up? Is that your game?
Some dumb redneck that thinks he understands climate science better than actual climate scientists is not worth that kind of effort. You should endeavor to have more than a rudimentary understanding of English before you start lying about your academic credentials.
You should endeavor to learn to research material for yourself rather than depend on scam artists to tell you what you should think. Had you done any actual research, you would realize that there is not a single piece of observed, measured evidence out there that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.