Reasonable
Gold Member
- Feb 9, 2017
- 19,787
- 2,401
- 290
- Banned
- #21
Link? I've never heard anyone say that.Another liberal myth is that only Black people were slaves.
You couldn't be lying could you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Link? I've never heard anyone say that.Another liberal myth is that only Black people were slaves.
Another liberal myth is that only Black people were slaves.
View attachment 144109Link? I've never heard anyone say that.Another liberal myth is that only Black people were slaves.
You couldn't be lying could you.
View attachment 144105William "April" Ellison: A Black Entrepreneur and Slave Owner in Sumter, S.C. (1790-1861)
William Ellison was a very wealthy black plantation owner and cotton gin manufacturer who lived in South Carolina (not North Carolina). According to the 1860 census(in which his surname was listed as “Ellerson”), he owned 63 black slaves, making him the largest of the 171 black slaveholders in South Carolina.
American Indians owned thousands of black slaves.
True. Historian Tiya Miles provided this snapshotof the Native American ownership of black slaves at the turn of the 19th century for Slate magazine in January 2016:
Miles places the number of enslaved people held by Cherokees at around 600 at the start of the 19th century and around 1,500 at the time of westward removal in 1838-9. (Creeks, Choctaws, and Chickasaws, she said, held around 3,500 slaves, across the three nations, as the 19th century began.) “Slavery inched its way slowly into Cherokee life,” Miles told me. “When a white man moved into a Native location, usually to work as a trader or as an Indian agent, he would own [African] slaves.” If such a person also had a child with a Native woman, as was not uncommon, the half-European, half-Native child would inherit the enslaved people (and their children) under white law, as well as the right to use tribal lands under tribal law. This combination put such people in a position to expand their wealth, eventually operating large farms and plantations.
In 1830 there were 3,775 free black people who owned 12,740 black slaves.
Approximately true, according to historian R. Halliburton Jr.:
There were approximately 319,599 free blacks in the United States in 1830. Approximately 13.7 per cent of the total black population was free. A significant number of these free blacks were the owners of slaves. The census of 1830 lists 3,775 free Negroes who owned a total of 12,760 slaves.
Brutal black-on-black slavery was common in Africa for thousands of years.
True, in the sense that the phenomenon of human beings enslaving other human beings goes back thousands of years, but not just among blacks, and not just in Africa.
----------
Fucking hilarious.
Worse. They ignore it. They cannot deny facts. Oooop, wait. They are the fucking morons on the left.Do you deny it?View attachment 144105William "April" Ellison: A Black Entrepreneur and Slave Owner in Sumter, S.C. (1790-1861)
William Ellison was a very wealthy black plantation owner and cotton gin manufacturer who lived in South Carolina (not North Carolina). According to the 1860 census(in which his surname was listed as “Ellerson”), he owned 63 black slaves, making him the largest of the 171 black slaveholders in South Carolina.
American Indians owned thousands of black slaves.
True. Historian Tiya Miles provided this snapshotof the Native American ownership of black slaves at the turn of the 19th century for Slate magazine in January 2016:
Miles places the number of enslaved people held by Cherokees at around 600 at the start of the 19th century and around 1,500 at the time of westward removal in 1838-9. (Creeks, Choctaws, and Chickasaws, she said, held around 3,500 slaves, across the three nations, as the 19th century began.) “Slavery inched its way slowly into Cherokee life,” Miles told me. “When a white man moved into a Native location, usually to work as a trader or as an Indian agent, he would own [African] slaves.” If such a person also had a child with a Native woman, as was not uncommon, the half-European, half-Native child would inherit the enslaved people (and their children) under white law, as well as the right to use tribal lands under tribal law. This combination put such people in a position to expand their wealth, eventually operating large farms and plantations.
In 1830 there were 3,775 free black people who owned 12,740 black slaves.
Approximately true, according to historian R. Halliburton Jr.:
There were approximately 319,599 free blacks in the United States in 1830. Approximately 13.7 per cent of the total black population was free. A significant number of these free blacks were the owners of slaves. The census of 1830 lists 3,775 free Negroes who owned a total of 12,760 slaves.
Brutal black-on-black slavery was common in Africa for thousands of years.
True, in the sense that the phenomenon of human beings enslaving other human beings goes back thousands of years, but not just among blacks, and not just in Africa.
----------
Fucking hilarious.
Yeah right. Don't make me laugh.Another liberal myth is that only Black people were slaves.
You would think the self-proclaimed smartest people on the planet would know a little history.
Prices varied. Whereas white slaves might have cost 12 pounds because they were slaves only until their indentures ended, black slaves might have cost 20 pounds because they were slaves for life.i have always wondered how much slaves cost in the 1860's. did the bidding start at 3 or 4 cents?
Yup.View attachment 144109Link? I've never heard anyone say that.Another liberal myth is that only Black people were slaves.
You couldn't be lying could you.