Libs Are Against Gun Crimes / Guns...But Are AGAINST Tougher Sentences For Gun Crimes?

[easyt65]

"Gorsuch sided with liberal justices in a 5-4 decision in United States v. Davis, for which he wrote the opinion of the court. The law in question calls for longer sentences when a person uses a firearm in connection with a "crime of violence," which is defined as a felony "that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense." That definition is rather confusing, Gorsuch said."

1. Dems are / were against tougher / longer sentences for committing crimes with weapons - guns.....despite their overall goal of getting rid of everyone's right to own a gun?
-- That kinda goes along with the fact that liberals actually HATE enforcing existing laws. They usually push for new laws instead of mandating the existing ones be enforced. This is just a continuous jog / run / push towards their overall final demand of outlawing all guns....

2. "Crime of Violence: 'That by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense" is confusing?

I think we have to blame this one on several things:

A. The DUMBING DOWN OF AMERICA through the continuous intentional decline of the public (and college) school system to churn out more and more ignorant Americans who can be easily manipulated, indoctrinated, and funneled into the Liberal policy of 'Economic Slavery' (dependency on hand-outs and Democrats who provide them = 'votes') they intend to being back if they win back power in 2020.

B. 'LAWYER SPEAK'. In the original bill all the lawyers politicians had to say was: 'IF YOU USE A GUN IN A CRIME, THE POSSIBILITY THAT SOMEONE WILL GET SHOT GOES WAY UP FROM ' ZERO' - COMMITTING A CRIME WITHOUT ONE...SO, IF YOU COMMIT A CRIME WITH A GUN YOU GET AN AUTOMATIC INCREASE IN PUNISHMENT / PRISON! TIME! NO EXCEPTIONS.'


Gorsuch sides with liberals in shooting down tougher sentences for gun crimes
-- Even Hillary would not be too stupid to NOT know she was breaking the law if she did so with a gun under this 'definition;. .

 

[P F Tinmore]

"Gorsuch sided with liberal justices in a 5-4 decision in United States v. Davis, for which he wrote the opinion of the court. The law in question calls for longer sentences when a person uses a firearm in connection with a "crime of violence," which is defined as a felony "that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense." That definition is rather confusing, Gorsuch said."

1. Dems are / were against tougher / longer sentences for committing crimes with weapons - guns.....despite their overall goal of getting rid of everyone's right to own a gun?
-- That kinda goes along with the fact that liberals actually HATE enforcing existing laws. They usually push for new laws instead of mandating the existing ones be enforced. This is just a continuous jog / run / push towards their overall final demand of outlawing all guns....

2. "Crime of Violence: 'That by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense" is confusing?

I think we have to blame this one on several things:

A. The DUMBING DOWN OF AMERICA through the continuous intentional decline of the public (and college) school system to churn out more and more ignorant Americans who can be easily manipulated, indoctrinated, and funneled into the Liberal policy of 'Economic Slavery' (dependency on hand-outs and Democrats who provide them = 'votes') they intend to being back if they win back power in 2020.

B. 'LAWYER SPEAK'. In the original bill all the lawyers politicians had to say was: 'IF YOU USE A GUN IN A CRIME, THE POSSIBILITY THAT SOMEONE WILL GET SHOT GOES WAY UP FROM ' ZERO' - COMMITTING A CRIME WITHOUT ONE...SO, IF YOU COMMIT A CRIME WITH A GUN YOU GET AN AUTOMATIC INCREASE IN PUNISHMENT / PRISON! TIME! NO EXCEPTIONS.'


Gorsuch sides with liberals in shooting down tougher sentences for gun crimes
-- Even Hillary would not be too stupid to NOT know she was breaking the law if she did so with a gun under this 'definition;. .

I don't know if it still applies but in Ohio, anyone committing a crime with a gun got an additional 8 years. Sounds like a good idea to me.

 

[Moonglow]

"Gorsuch sided with liberal justices in a 5-4 decision in United States v. Davis, for which he wrote the opinion of the court. The law in question calls for longer sentences when a person uses a firearm in connection with a "crime of violence," which is defined as a felony "that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense." That definition is rather confusing, Gorsuch said."

1. Dems are / were against tougher / longer sentences for committing crimes with weapons - guns.....despite their overall goal of getting rid of everyone's right to own a gun?
-- That kinda goes along with the fact that liberals actually HATE enforcing existing laws. They usually push for new laws instead of mandating the existing ones be enforced. This is just a continuous jog / run / push towards their overall final demand of outlawing all guns....

2. "Crime of Violence: 'That by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense" is confusing?

I think we have to blame this one on several things:

A. The DUMBING DOWN OF AMERICA through the continuous intentional decline of the public (and college) school system to churn out more and more ignorant Americans who can be easily manipulated, indoctrinated, and funneled into the Liberal policy of 'Economic Slavery' (dependency on hand-outs and Democrats who provide them = 'votes') they intend to being back if they win back power in 2020.

B. 'LAWYER SPEAK'. In the original bill all the lawyers politicians had to say was: 'IF YOU USE A GUN IN A CRIME, THE POSSIBILITY THAT SOMEONE WILL GET SHOT GOES WAY UP FROM ' ZERO' - COMMITTING A CRIME WITHOUT ONE...SO, IF YOU COMMIT A CRIME WITH A GUN YOU GET AN AUTOMATIC INCREASE IN PUNISHMENT / PRISON! TIME! NO EXCEPTIONS.'


Gorsuch sides with liberals in shooting down tougher sentences for gun crimes
-- Even Hillary would not be too stupid to NOT know she was breaking the law if she did so with a gun under this 'definition;. .

I don't know if it still applies but in Ohio, anyone committing a crime with a gun got an additional 8 years. Sounds like a good idea to me.

It is the same anywhere in the US..

 

[westwall]

"Gorsuch sided with liberal justices in a 5-4 decision in United States v. Davis, for which he wrote the opinion of the court. The law in question calls for longer sentences when a person uses a firearm in connection with a "crime of violence," which is defined as a felony "that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense." That definition is rather confusing, Gorsuch said."

1. Dems are / were against tougher / longer sentences for committing crimes with weapons - guns.....despite their overall goal of getting rid of everyone's right to own a gun?
-- That kinda goes along with the fact that liberals actually HATE enforcing existing laws. They usually push for new laws instead of mandating the existing ones be enforced. This is just a continuous jog / run / push towards their overall final demand of outlawing all guns....

2. "Crime of Violence: 'That by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense" is confusing?

I think we have to blame this one on several things:

A. The DUMBING DOWN OF AMERICA through the continuous intentional decline of the public (and college) school system to churn out more and more ignorant Americans who can be easily manipulated, indoctrinated, and funneled into the Liberal policy of 'Economic Slavery' (dependency on hand-outs and Democrats who provide them = 'votes') they intend to being back if they win back power in 2020.

B. 'LAWYER SPEAK'. In the original bill all the lawyers politicians had to say was: 'IF YOU USE A GUN IN A CRIME, THE POSSIBILITY THAT SOMEONE WILL GET SHOT GOES WAY UP FROM ' ZERO' - COMMITTING A CRIME WITHOUT ONE...SO, IF YOU COMMIT A CRIME WITH A GUN YOU GET AN AUTOMATIC INCREASE IN PUNISHMENT / PRISON! TIME! NO EXCEPTIONS.'


Gorsuch sides with liberals in shooting down tougher sentences for gun crimes
-- Even Hillary would not be too stupid to NOT know she was breaking the law if she did so with a gun under this 'definition;. .

I don't know if it still applies but in Ohio, anyone committing a crime with a gun got an additional 8 years. Sounds like a good idea to me.

It is the same anywhere in the US..

Almost always the first thing negotiated away in a plea deal. California has had those laws on the books for years and you can count the number of times the law has been imposed on your fingers and toes.

 

[BluesLegend]

The left don't care about gun crimes or enforcing existing laws. The left want to ban private ownership of guns because they are petty and vindictive and they know its something that riles up the right.

 

[Edgetho]

I'm waiting for dimocrap scum to sue Tyson Foods because they're so incredibly fat.

I don't know who they'd sue for their stupidity. Their parents?

 

[Edgetho]

The left don't care about gun crimes or enforcing existing laws. The left want to ban private ownership of guns because they are petty and vindictive and they know its something that riles up the right.

Not entirely accurate.

They want to deprive us of guns so the Deep State can push us around.

The first thing EVERY Despot in human history has ever done is to take away the weapons of the people they rule over.

dimocrap FILTH don't want to govern, they want to RULE.

word

 

[bendog]

Those darn liberals constraining state power to actually name the violent crimes …. like murder, rape, assault, armed robbery ……

 

[BluesLegend]

The left don't care about gun crimes or enforcing existing laws. The left want to ban private ownership of guns because they are petty and vindictive and they know its something that riles up the right.

Not entirely accurate.

They want to deprive us of guns so the Deep State can push us around.

The first thing EVERY Despot in human history has ever done is to take away the weapons of the people they rule over.

dimocrap FILTH don't want to govern, they want to RULE.

word

Its entirely about power and control. The state telling the people what to do. What the people can say, think, do the left is constantly passing laws to force people to obey their world view.