insein
Senior Member
jillian said:I'm open for polite discussion. I'm not the one throwing around terms like "libs" am I? Though I am kind of curious why accurate definitions offend you so very much.
But thanks for letting me know that only a right wing pov is welcome on the board. I figured moderation, stated without rancor is acceptable in any circle.
Cheers.
You called Rush Limbaugh a liar and said that that speaks for my credibility. The irony is that it spells out yours clearly. If you make an accusation against a person with incredible accuracy such as Rush (its documented how accurate his opinions are on his website) then you had better come with some specific evidence to prove your point. Once again though, you prove my point about the seriousness of the charge (Rush is a liar) being more important than the nature of your evidence (none).
If you think only a "Right Wing" POV is allowed on this site then why have you not been banned? Also perhaps you should use the "search" feature and see for yourself what kinds of POV's are allowed on this site before making yourself look more foolish than you already have.
As for the sexual harassment charge, I don't see anything there that would clearly define how this librarian specifically harrassed anyone of those faculty members beyond having a difference of opinion from their own. Since this doesnt sit well with these people, they needed to find a charge that will get him fired from his position. So rather than debating the librarian on the differences of opinions, they chose to silence him through loose accusations conjured up through a meeting of faculty heads with the sole intent of quieting the opposition. Sounds very worthy of the time of the University administration.
So again i state, its the seriousness of the charge and not the nature of the evidence. What will happen to the faculty members that brought these accusations when the evidence is not found to properly "convict" the librarian of sexual harrassment? Nothing. They had to investigate the seriousness of the charge because you need to take sexual harrassment seriously but no reprimand or consequence will be brought upon the offended party should the evidence be non-existent.