Liberals Keep Minimizing Real Threat From Radical Muslims

[Clementine]

It's not workplace violence or domestic abuse when non-Muslims are beheaded and women are tortured or killed because they don't obey the rules. It is radical Islam and it is dangerous. When a mosque in our country teaches it's members that killing infidels is okay and that terrorists should be protected because they are fellow Muslims, the mosque should be shut down and any that promote violence should be banned permanently. Instead, we welcome them and pretend it's all about freedom of religion.

Liberals understand and support the separation of church and state, yet they constantly defend radical Muslims even though they cannot distinguish between religious beliefs and governments. They are one and the same to them. I will never understand why the left continues to stand by radical Muslims after countless murders of infidels, yet continue to bash the Christians because they don't support abortion. It makes no sense.

Every time a radical Muslim murders, the left is quick to make excuses for them. The Benghazi ambassador and the others died because a filmmaker angered the Muslims. They don't say that the scum of the earth used a flimsy excuse to murder and instead they justify the killings by saying the filmmaker shouldn't have pissed them off to begin with. The accepted rule is that if anyone offends a Muslims, the murders that follow are expected as a normal reaction. Well, normal for radical Muslims, who are never required to take personal responsibility for murdering because they disagreed with or were offended by someone with a differing view or criticism. It's always someone else's fault. Is blaming others a common trait among radicals?

From the Ft. Hood shooter to the latest beheading, the left jumped in to warn people not to judge all Muslims, a courtesy not afforded to Christians who are bashed for merely speaking out. The left ignores the praises to Allah as murders occur and claim it has nothing to do with Islam. They've even claimed that ISIS killings had nothing to do with Islam.

One thing the cold-blooded murderers all have in common is attending mosques with radical Imams, who teach that the torture and murder of infidels is a good thing.

When will we wise up and go after radical Imams who teach such hatred and encourage violence? It has nothing to do with religious freedom and everything to do with terrorism in the name of religion. By insisting that we tolerate all Muslims, we allow the worst of the worst to carry on with their jihad. When the line between worshipping and terrorism is clearly crossed, it's time to charge people with crimes and ban them from inciting more violence. No way should these radicals be tolerated when they intend to harm people for the 'crime' of being non-Muslim. I doubt the left will see the distinction between religious freedom/freedom of expression and plotting to kill people for reasons that are archaic and make no sense. Obama doesn't seem to notice any difference. I am tired of being told not to judge. When it comes to radicals, we should judge and we should take action. Otherwise, we are giving our approval for them to keep killing us.

I laugh at how some liberals keep claiming to be more intelligent than the right, yet claim Islam is peaceful and that the tea party members are terrorists. No acts of violence at the tea parties, yet the left cowered in fear because the right wants lower taxes, the Constitution followed and the Bill of Rights respected. That shit scares the left while beheadings in the name of Allah don't bother them. Obviously, being intelligent and being educated (by liberal professors) are two completely different things.

Noor explained that the mosque wouldn’t ever tell the public that they support radical Islam, however, behind closed doors they were told that the suicide bombings in Israel, along with other radical acts, were fully supported.

He also said they were taught that even if Osama bin Laden himself were to appear at their door, they should welcome him in because "he’s a fellow Muslim" and they "must protect" other believers from those who don’t practice Islam.

http://toprightnews.com/?p=6262

 

[Plasmaball]

It's not workplace violence or domestic abuse when non-Muslims are beheaded and women are tortured or killed because they don't obey the rules. It is radical Islam and it is dangerous. When a mosque in our country teaches it's members that killing infidels is okay and that terrorists should be protected because they are fellow Muslims, the mosque should be shut down and any that promote violence should be banned permanently. Instead, we welcome them and pretend it's all about freedom of religion.

yup not only are you a fucking bigot, but you also are anti 1st amendment as well..I can skip the rest of your rant because ive seen you post the same tripe before over and over again.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's not workplace violence or domestic abuse when non-Muslims are beheaded and women are tortured or killed because they don't obey the rules. It is radical Islam and it is dangerous. When a mosque in our country teaches it's members that killing infidels is okay and that terrorists should be protected because they are fellow Muslims, the mosque should be shut down and any that promote violence should be banned permanently. Instead, we welcome them and pretend it's all about freedom of religion.

Liberals understand and support the separation of church and state, yet they constantly defend radical Muslims even though they cannot distinguish between religious beliefs and governments. They are one and the same to them. I will never understand why the left continues to stand by radical Muslims after countless murders of infidels, yet continue to bash the Christians because they don't support abortion. It makes no sense.

Every time a radical Muslim murders, the left is quick to make excuses for them. The Benghazi ambassador and the others died because a filmmaker angered the Muslims. They don't say that the scum of the earth used a flimsy excuse to murder and instead they justify the killings by saying the filmmaker shouldn't have pissed them off to begin with. The accepted rule is that if anyone offends a Muslims, the murders that follow are expected as a normal reaction. Well, normal for radical Muslims, who are never required to take personal responsibility for murdering because they disagreed with or were offended by someone with a differing view or criticism. It's always someone else's fault. Is blaming others a common trait among radicals?

From the Ft. Hood shooter to the latest beheading, the left jumped in to warn people not to judge all Muslims, a courtesy not afforded to Christians who are bashed for merely speaking out. The left ignores the praises to Allah as murders occur and claim it has nothing to do with Islam. They've even claimed that ISIS killings had nothing to do with Islam.

One thing the cold-blooded murderers all have in common is attending mosques with radical Imams, who teach that the torture and murder of infidels is a good thing.

When will we wise up and go after radical Imams who teach such hatred and encourage violence? It has nothing to do with religious freedom and everything to do with terrorism in the name of religion. By insisting that we tolerate all Muslims, we allow the worst of the worst to carry on with their jihad. When the line between worshipping and terrorism is clearly crossed, it's time to charge people with crimes and ban them from inciting more violence. No way should these radicals be tolerated when they intend to harm people for the 'crime' of being non-Muslim. I doubt the left will see the distinction between religious freedom/freedom of expression and plotting to kill people for reasons that are archaic and make no sense. Obama doesn't seem to notice any difference. I am tired of being told not to judge. When it comes to radicals, we should judge and we should take action. Otherwise, we are giving our approval for them to keep killing us.

I laugh at how some liberals keep claiming to be more intelligent than the right, yet claim Islam is peaceful and that the tea party members are terrorists. No acts of violence at the tea parties, yet the left cowered in fear because the right wants lower taxes, the Constitution followed and the Bill of Rights respected. That shit scares the left while beheadings in the name of Allah don't bother them. Obviously, being intelligent and being educated (by liberal professors) are two completely different things.

Noor explained that the mosque wouldn’t ever tell the public that they support radical Islam, however, behind closed doors they were told that the suicide bombings in Israel, along with other radical acts, were fully supported.

He also said they were taught that even if Osama bin Laden himself were to appear at their door, they should welcome him in because "he’s a fellow Muslim" and they "must protect" other believers from those who don’t practice Islam.

http://toprightnews.com/?p=6262

Well...if they don't defend, apologize, for savagery.....how could they continue to espouse multiculturalism, moral relativism, and claim all cultures are equal?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's not workplace violence or domestic abuse when non-Muslims are beheaded and women are tortured or killed because they don't obey the rules. It is radical Islam and it is dangerous. When a mosque in our country teaches it's members that killing infidels is okay and that terrorists should be protected because they are fellow Muslims, the mosque should be shut down and any that promote violence should be banned permanently. Instead, we welcome them and pretend it's all about freedom of religion.

yup not only are you a fucking bigot, but you also are anti 1st amendment as well..I can skip the rest of your rant because ive seen you post the same tripe before over and over again.

Last week, on his radio show, Michael Medved went into some detail as to how the ISIS Islamists treat captured women.

The 'marry' them to fighters, some 10-11 times in a night....and each one gets to act out his version of 'the wedding night.'

It is no wonder that a number of the women commit suicide.

Give that image some thought before you behave in the role so appropriate for a Liberal...."offended."

 

[Plasmaball]

It's not workplace violence or domestic abuse when non-Muslims are beheaded and women are tortured or killed because they don't obey the rules. It is radical Islam and it is dangerous. When a mosque in our country teaches it's members that killing infidels is okay and that terrorists should be protected because they are fellow Muslims, the mosque should be shut down and any that promote violence should be banned permanently. Instead, we welcome them and pretend it's all about freedom of religion.

yup not only are you a fucking bigot, but you also are anti 1st amendment as well..I can skip the rest of your rant because ive seen you post the same tripe before over and over again.

Last week, on his radio show, Michael Medved went into some detail as to how the ISIS Islamists treat captured women.

The 'marry' them to fighters, some 10-11 times in a night....and each one gets to act out his version of 'the wedding night.'

It is no wonder that a number of the women commit suicide.

Give that image some thought before you behave in the role so appropriate for a Liberal...."offended."

so what? Is this supposed to change my mind about muslims as a whole? Its not.

Just yesterday i was reading about a Catholic Priest who had over 10000 pictures of little boys stored at his place. Does this mean every catholic is a kid toucher?

Under the OP's opinion yes,

 

[BlindBoo]

Please name some of the liberals you accuse of defending murderous Radical Islamics. All the liberal I know are anti-religious fanatics and they all consider the radical Muslims much more fanatical and dangerous than most other religious nuts.

Your hate filled tirade is nothing but fantastical adventure in building a straw man to pour your bias opinion out.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Islam is not a threat to the United States. Christians have come much closer to taking over our government.......and not a peep out of you nutters. Fortunately, we've got enough reasonable people to prevent either freakshow from taking over.

Terrorists are a threat to all people who inhabit this earth. I choose not to live my life in fear anyway.

 

[bendog]

Clementine, do you have any evidence of Mosques in the US advocating attacks against Americans?

 

[Clementine]

It's not workplace violence or domestic abuse when non-Muslims are beheaded and women are tortured or killed because they don't obey the rules. It is radical Islam and it is dangerous. When a mosque in our country teaches it's members that killing infidels is okay and that terrorists should be protected because they are fellow Muslims, the mosque should be shut down and any that promote violence should be banned permanently. Instead, we welcome them and pretend it's all about freedom of religion.

yup not only are you a fucking bigot, but you also are anti 1st amendment as well..I can skip the rest of your rant because ive seen you post the same tripe before over and over again.

Last week, on his radio show, Michael Medved went into some detail as to how the ISIS Islamists treat captured women.

The 'marry' them to fighters, some 10-11 times in a night....and each one gets to act out his version of 'the wedding night.'

It is no wonder that a number of the women commit suicide.

Give that image some thought before you behave in the role so appropriate for a Liberal...."offended."

so what? Is this supposed to change my mind about muslims as a whole? Its not.

Just yesterday i was reading about a Catholic Priest who had over 10000 pictures of little boys stored at his place. Does this mean every catholic is a kid toucher?

Under the OP's opinion yes,

Read the OP post again. Do you understand the word 'radical?' I clearly stated radical Muslims need to be dealt with, but you followed the typical liberal protocol and claimed I was talking about all Muslims. The radical ones should never be protected or tolerated.

 

[Clementine]

Clementine, do you have any evidence of Mosques in the US advocating attacks against Americans?

In the link, a former member of the mosque discussed what the Imam told everyone who attended. Short of going to mosques and listening for yourself, talking to someone who has been there is the only way to know what goes on. No mosque will allow cameras in and the radicals aren't about to openly discuss what they do. Most members will say nothing, so you either interview a former member, like in this link, or you take notice when you see terrorists who attended the very same mosque. It is a red flag.

 

[bendog]

"We"? Who is we?

Megan has one unidentified source who says the mosque said attacks on Israel were ok, and if bin laden walked in the door, he wouldn't be turned away, even though he's dead.

I'm always fascinated by people who are sure the mosque next door is training terrorists.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Clementine, do you have any evidence of Mosques in the US advocating attacks against Americans?

"MOORE, Oklahoma -- Alton Nolen, the man who beheaded one woman and severely injured another at Vaughan Foods in Moore, Oklahoma, was apparently a radicalized Muslim. Nolen attended the same mosque as Zacarias Moussaoui, a man convicted in federal court of conspiring to kill U.S. citizens as part of the September 11 attacks, Breitbart Texas has learned. ...."We do have people here who have an extreme way of thinking," Mohammed admitted. "
Beheading Suspect Attended Same Mosque as 9 11 Terrorist



And...with that in mind.....what will Obama/Holder do???


"The Justice Department is expected to issue a broad new policy in the coming two to three weeks banning religious and other forms of profiling by federal law enforcement officers, department sources said Friday.
The long-awaited policy will not include an exemption for national security investigations, sources said. National security officials and others in the administration concerned about terrorism lobbied hard for such an exemption, according to congressional sources."
Justice Department to ban profiling by federal law enforcement - LA Times

 

[PoliticalChic]

Please name some of the liberals you accuse of defending murderous Radical Islamics. All the liberal I know are anti-religious fanatics and they all consider the radical Muslims much more fanatical and dangerous than most other religious nuts.

Your hate filled tirade is nothing but fantastical adventure in building a straw man to pour your bias opinion out.

Barack Hussein Obama and Eric Holder (peace be on them)

See post #12

 

[Justin Davis]

Well...if they don't defend, apologize, for savagery.....how could they continue to espouse multiculturalism, moral relativism, and claim all cultures are equal?

And attack the big, bad meanie Israel? Sheesh.

 

[Clementine]

Think about it. The latest killing in the name of Islam was committed by a guy who was not raised Muslim. The family insists that he was never like this.

The guy attended the same mosque as other known radicals and in no time, he was willing to kill in the name of Islam. Who do you suppose influenced this guy to the point where he desperately tried to convert people to Islam before beheading a woman and attempting to kill another because they refused to convert? Do you think it's coincidence?

The left will chalk it up to the right's imagination because their lord and master has instructed them to look the other way when it comes to violent radical Muslims.

It seems apparent that there is an effort to not only convert people, but to prey on the weak and convince them to kill those who don't convert. This is exactly what we are seeing with ISIS and other radical Muslims. This same pattern is rampant throughout the Muslim world. There are simply too many of them who feel justified to kill because of a mere insult or refusal to join their cult. Obama and Hillary claimed that the film maker angered some average protesters to the point where they became cold-blooded murderers. While we know it was terrorism, just the fact that Obama believes that average people can be prompted to murder over insults to the Muslim religion tells us that it takes little to turn someone into a killer. If it is really as easy as Obama says, that an insult can result in killings, then there is an even bigger danger than we thought. It's one thing to understand that there are deranged Muslims who want to control the world and rid it of infidels. It's quite another to say that offending Islam in any way will prompt even the most typical of Muslims to kill infidels.

It's no coincidence that the killers scream 'Allah' as they commence with the shooting, beheading or bombing of infidel targets. It's become too commonplace, yet the left says there is no problem,. How many killings to do we need before they will say we must act? If you compare the number of school shootings to the number of terrorist attacks carried out by radical Muslims, it makes it even more incredible that the left sees random mass shootings as a major epidemic and terrorist attacks as rare. The left pretends the NRA is the common denominator among mass shootings, which is no where near true, yet they ignore the common thread among radical Muslim terrorists.

Of course, some liberal media will offer up skewed statistics that don't count the number of actual terrorist attacks. It doesn't work with their current agenda, so terrorism will continue to be reduced to domestic abuse or work place violence just so they don't have to count the incidents as the terrorist attacks that they are.

We are going to hear more and more about the fictitious war the right has declared on women and the same ones making that outrageous claim will continue to shelter the real war on women committed by Muslims every day. How can anyone claim to support women's rights when they defend a group that denies rights to women and treats them so poorly?

How can not paying for every form of birth control for a woman be considered worse than stoning her to death for breaking Sharia law? The left bitches all the time about the first one and ignores the latter.

 

[Justin Davis]

Think about it. The latest killing in the name of Islam was committed by a guy who was not raised Muslim. The family insists that he was never like this.

The guy attended the same mosque as other known radicals and in no time, he was willing to kill in the name of Islam. Who do you suppose influenced this guy to the point where he desperately tried to convert people to Islam before beheading a woman and attempting to kill another because they refused to convert? Do you think it's coincidence?

The left will chalk it up to coincidence because their lord and master has instructed them to look the other way when it comes to violent radical Muslims.

It seems apparent that there is an effort to not only convert people, but to prey on the weak and convince them to kill those who don't convert. This is exactly what we are seeing with ISIS and other radical Muslims. It seems that this sick mindset is rampant throughout the Muslim world. There is simply too many terrorists who feel justified because of a mere insult. Obama and Hillary claimed that the film maker angered some average protesters to the point where they became cold-blooded murderers. While we know it was terrorism, just the fact that Obama believes that average people can be prompted to murder over insults to the Muslim religion tells us that it takes little to turn someone into a killer. If it is really as easy as Obama says, that an insult can result in killings, then there is an even bigger danger than we thought. It's one thing to understand that there are deranged Muslims who want to control the world and rid it of infidels. It's quite another to say that offending Islam in any way will prompt even the most typical of Muslims to kill infidels.

It's no coincidence that the killers scream 'Allah' as they commence with the shooting, beheading or bombing of infidel targets. It's become too commonplace, yet the left says there is no problem,. How many killings to do we need before they will say we must act? If you compare the number of school shootings to the number of terrorist attacks carried out by radical Muslims, it makes it even more incredible that the left sees random mass shootings as a major epidemic and terrorist attacks as rare. Of course, some liberal media will offer up skewed statistics that don't count the number of actual terrorist attacks. It doesn't work with their current agenda, so terrorism will continue to be reduced to domestic abuse or work place violence just so they don't have to count the incidents as the terrorist attacks that they are.

Islam is the religion of perpetual adolescence. Muslims are entitled to so much and are so easily offended. They remind of liberals.

 

[Plasmaball]

It's not workplace violence or domestic abuse when non-Muslims are beheaded and women are tortured or killed because they don't obey the rules. It is radical Islam and it is dangerous. When a mosque in our country teaches it's members that killing infidels is okay and that terrorists should be protected because they are fellow Muslims, the mosque should be shut down and any that promote violence should be banned permanently. Instead, we welcome them and pretend it's all about freedom of religion.

yup not only are you a fucking bigot, but you also are anti 1st amendment as well..I can skip the rest of your rant because ive seen you post the same tripe before over and over again.

Last week, on his radio show, Michael Medved went into some detail as to how the ISIS Islamists treat captured women.

The 'marry' them to fighters, some 10-11 times in a night....and each one gets to act out his version of 'the wedding night.'

It is no wonder that a number of the women commit suicide.

Give that image some thought before you behave in the role so appropriate for a Liberal...."offended."

so what? Is this supposed to change my mind about muslims as a whole? Its not.

Just yesterday i was reading about a Catholic Priest who had over 10000 pictures of little boys stored at his place. Does this mean every catholic is a kid toucher?

Under the OP's opinion yes,

Read the OP post again. Do you understand the word 'radical?' I clearly stated radical Muslims need to be dealt with, but you followed the typical liberal protocol and claimed I was talking about all Muslims. The radical ones should never be protected or tolerated.

Bigot is a bigot.I know your history

 

[Vigilante]