Liberal Economic "thought"

you are no expert on what happened.

You cant even understand this SEC document
 
Liberal Economic "thought" aka: How to get it totally wrong and win a Noble Prize while destroying an entire nation in the process.

It's bad when a private company adds debt and threatens the enterprise with insolvency but its good when the government adds unlimited amount of debts on the nation.

Is this another ‘Winning Strategies’ thread?
 
They base their economic stance on fucking lies.

Bad info in


bad decisions out
 
The "mess" as you put it was created by both parties.

Obama's handling of the economy since taking office has led to the worst recovery from a recession since the Great Depression. Unemployment is still hovering around 9% despite government spending Billions of dollars on stimulus four YEARS after the recession started and the economy is growing at about 1 and 1/2% percent per year which is about as anemic a rate of growth as we've ever had. The one part of the economy that has improved dramatically, creating tens of thousands of good paying new jobs is in the energy sector but that was growth that took place not because of Barack Obama but despite him. In the areas of the energy sector that the Federal government controlled, production of oil and natural gas actually declined due to Barry's ongoing war on fossil fuels. At the same time billions of taxpayer dollars were squandered by this Administration in loan guarantees to various "green energy" companies that took our money and then declared bankruptcy mere months later. Was THAT mess created by the Republicans?

The Bush admin CREATED this housing mess all on their own.


They held back the partys of GLBact that would have prevented this housing mess from growing and growing

George W. Bush was one of the few people in Washington warning about the danger our policies with Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac could get us into. He was calling for legislation to rein in the two entities but Barney Frank assured us all that there was no problem at all. Take off the partisan blinders, TM...your blather on this issue simply makes you appear either ignorant or hopelessly biased.
Why not offer some proof, oldstyle. Sorry, but your opinion is not worth anything.
 
So Oldstyle, at it again, is making statements that are outright lies. Typical of oldstyle. Con dogma, to hell with the truth.
Obama's handling of the economy since taking office has led to the worst recovery from a recession since the Great Depression. Unemployment is still hovering around 9%
Sorry, the unemployment rate is, as anyone with the slightest clue knows, about 7.9%. Perhaps Oldstyle is digitally challenged. But most know that there is a major difference between 7.8 and 9. And oldstyle does not give credit to the congressional repubs, who have blocked any and all stimulus that would be of help.
despite government spending Billions of dollars on stimulus four YEARS after the recession started
The stimulus spending began in 2009, with most expenditures happening in 2010 and little happening since. Most economists agree that the stimulus was way too small.
and the economy is growing at about 1 and 1/2% percent per year which is about as anemic a rate of growth as we've ever had.
The growth rate has been much higher, as Oldstyle knows. Funny that oldstyle can not come up with a link to prove his numbers, eh.
The one part of the economy that has improved dramatically, creating tens of thousands of good paying new jobs is in the energy sector but that was growth that took place not because of Barack Obama but despite him.

In the areas of the energy sector that the Federal government controlled, production of oil and natural gas actually declined due to Barry's ongoing war on fossil fuels.
Again, con dogma. Gas supplies are up. Demand for gas is down. But whatever you do, oldstyle, do not give any credit to the current admin. And no links to prove his statements.

At the same time billions of taxpayer dollars were squandered by this Administration in loan guarantees to various "green energy" companies that took our money and then declared bankruptcy mere months later.
There were far fewer failures, including bankruptcies, than in the general business world. Funny how green energy is dirty word to cons, just as it is to the energy industry who pays the con politicians.
Do you have any proof for anything that you said in this post. I think not, because it has been disproved too many times. Just more of what Oldstyle does. Post con dogma with no impartial proof. Because, as always, Oldstyle is just a con tool, who follows without any question whatever his con bosses tell him.
 
Liberal Economic "thought" aka: How to get it totally wrong and win a Noble Prize while destroying an entire nation in the process.

It's bad when a private company adds debt and threatens the enterprise with insolvency but its good when the government adds unlimited amount of debts on the nation.

Huh? Once again you make little sense. Just kidding. You make no sense.
 
Oldstyle is just a con tool, who follows without any question whatever his con bosses tell him.


same with Jefferson and Friedman. Can you say word one about your disagreement with them??

Since you cant why bother to be here at all??

Ask a con if the can state his objection to leading liberals and they will welcome the opportunity, not run away with their liberal tails between their legs as you must!!

What does that tell you?? Do you have the IQ and character to think about it? As a liberal you don't.
 

Forum List

Back
Top