Let This Sink In: Elon Sues Media Matters

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
91,798
62,667
2,605
Right coast, classified
1700587774091.jpeg

X alleges that Media Matters “knowingly and maliciously” manufactured images to show advertising where it didn’t exist, specifically for the purpose of harming and destroying X.
The Complaint describes the standard operating procedures for the Institutional left including captured institutions and corporations.

X logs everything you do, and Media Matters will have a hard time fighting it.

Tracy lays out the case in plain English:

 
Last edited:
What is frustrating is how slow the judicial process is as these types of cases carry on for years. On this one, I'll guess that Media Matters will toss in the towel knowing of Musk's deep pockets and his ability to sustain a lengthy court battle.
 
View attachment 861843
X alleges that Media Matters “knowingly and maliciously” manufactured images to show advertising where it didn’t exist, specifically for the purpose of harming and destroying X.
The Complaint describes the standard operating procedures for the Institutional left including captured institutions and corporations.

X logs everything you do, and Media Matters will have a hard time fighting it.

Tracy lays out the case in plain English:


This could be a landmark case in squashing the Woke Bugs infesting our country!
 
Since Twitter users can curate their own advertising experience, Musk says an internal investigation shows that MMFA used Twitter/X accounts opened slightly more than 30 days ago to "evade content filtering" and then followed only extremist accounts and the platform's largest advertisers, therefore "precision design[ing]" unique pairings of the two in their feed. But, the lawsuit claims, that was still not enough to create the unique and extremist content they wanted to use in their hit pieces. Musk says that to achieve the most damning-looking content, Media Matters had to resort "to endless scrolling and refreshing its unrepresentative, hand-selected feed, generated between 13 and 15 times more advertisements per hour than the typical X user." The lawsuit says this "inauthentic activity" was kept up until MMFA got the desired result: "controversial content next to X's largest advertisers' paid posts."



In its posts damning Musk and Twitter/X, the lawsuit says MMFA claims to have "found" this content, failing to note they'd manipulated the algorithm to achieve it. But as the lawsuit alleges, they didn't "find" it; they "created" it. MMFA then hid from readers and advertisers how the results were manipulated.
 
Since Twitter users can curate their own advertising experience, Musk says an internal investigation shows that MMFA used Twitter/X accounts opened slightly more than 30 days ago to "evade content filtering" and then followed only extremist accounts and the platform's largest advertisers, therefore "precision design[ing]" unique pairings of the two in their feed. But, the lawsuit claims, that was still not enough to create the unique and extremist content they wanted to use in their hit pieces. Musk says that to achieve the most damning-looking content, Media Matters had to resort "to endless scrolling and refreshing its unrepresentative, hand-selected feed, generated between 13 and 15 times more advertisements per hour than the typical X user." The lawsuit says this "inauthentic activity" was kept up until MMFA got the desired result: "controversial content next to X's largest advertisers' paid posts."



In its posts damning Musk and Twitter/X, the lawsuit says MMFA claims to have "found" this content, failing to note they'd manipulated the algorithm to achieve it. But as the lawsuit alleges, they didn't "find" it; they "created" it. MMFA then hid from readers and advertisers how the results were manipulated.
Fact of the matter is that Twitter served those ads next to those extremists posts.

Nothing was fabricated.

The truth is the best possible defense against this lawsuit, it will fail.

Musk doesn't actually believe in free speech. He's trying to silence his critics.
 
Musk tried to back out because he made a terrible mistake.

Twitter sued for breach of contract.


You don't know shit but attack others. How embarrassing for you, moron.
considering the government corruption thats been exposed since he purchased it, it a perfect winner,,
 
All part of the art of the deal.
Nonsense. Musk tried to back out because he made a huge mistake and couldn't. He was forced to buy Twitter for the price he initially agreed to.

His attempt to back out failed miserably.
 

Forum List

Back
Top