Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If you hear a conservative claim that "the decision was 7-2" in this case, explain to him/her that this isn't true:
If you hear a conservative claim that "the decision was 7-2" in this case, explain to him/her that this isn't true:
If you hear a conservative claim that "the decision was 7-2" in this case, explain to him/her that this isn't true:
If you hear a conservative claim that "the decision was 7-2" in this case, explain to him/her that this isn't true:
My take is that it was 7-2 against standing and 9-0 that the complaint was unworthy of any relief.
If you hear a conservative claim that "the decision was 7-2" in this case, explain to him/her that this isn't true:
Likely they will take on a lingering case later, so as not to disenfranchise anyone. If they do nothing, our elections mean nothing. Almost half the states acknowledged they don't have confidence in the results. That's not a legacy the court wants.
Black letter law in these states suggests otherwise.Or....Texas' petition was obvious pseudo-legal horseshit.Likely they will take on a lingering case later, so as not to disenfranchise anyone. If they do nothing, our elections mean nothing. Almost half the states acknowledged they don't have confidence in the results. That's not a legacy the court wants.
Never discount the possibility that you're just wrong. Especially when the weight of evidence so strongly suggests it.
If you hear a conservative claim that "the decision was 7-2" in this case, explain to him/her that this isn't true:
Wasn't a dissent. It was an important explanation that blew right thru the canyon between your ears.
The explanation was -- they did NOT agree that the SupCt couldn't take the case on the pretense technicality that one state didn't have standing to challenge NATIONAL election results. They cited precedence for why that "excuse" about "standing was faulty. But then they explained that even if the case HAD been taken -- ANY REMEDY for damages (and there are damages and violations of State and FEDERAL Constitution) -- any remedy can really only come from the various State Legislatures that got screwed by activist courts and the Exec branch of their states.. Those entities ILLEGALLY changed law that only the STATEHOUSES can legally and constitutionally touch..
It's THEIR negligence that ALLOWED these illegal, election stealing rules to become embedded. And now THEY have sole power to assert their powers and remedy them..
Once the mail ballots were unpacked and stripped of chain of custody in terms of postmarks and signatures -- NO court can "repair" that damage. The theft is on the books for good.
So true. I'm a back seat driver and even I saw this coming. Good thing our imperfect court system still works.Likely they will take on a lingering case later, so as not to disenfranchise anyone. If they do nothing, our elections mean nothing. Almost half the states acknowledged they don't have confidence in the results. That's not a legacy the court wants.
Or....Texas' petition was obvious pseudo-legal horseshit.
Never discount the possibility that you're just wrong. Especially when the weight of evidence so strongly suggests it.
Having said that, what is you alternative?Guns are banned. We knew that already. Fucking Democrat assholes on the bench. All nine of them. Graduated with full Democrat honors from Democrat Ivy League institutions, in good standing with the local Democrat bar association, having advanced progressive Democrat causes in court and qualified to sit on the highest bench of a Democrat institution of Democrat law.
So true. I'm a back seat driver and even I saw this coming. Good thing our imperfect court system still works.Likely they will take on a lingering case later, so as not to disenfranchise anyone. If they do nothing, our elections mean nothing. Almost half the states acknowledged they don't have confidence in the results. That's not a legacy the court wants.
Or....Texas' petition was obvious pseudo-legal horseshit.
Never discount the possibility that you're just wrong. Especially when the weight of evidence so strongly suggests it.
Having said that, what is you alternative?Guns are banned. We knew that already. Fucking Democrat assholes on the bench. All nine of them. Graduated with full Democrat honors from Democrat Ivy League institutions, in good standing with the local Democrat bar association, having advanced progressive Democrat causes in court and qualified to sit on the highest bench of a Democrat institution of Democrat law.
"poleaxed" I looked that up.So true. I'm a back seat driver and even I saw this coming. Good thing our imperfect court system still works.Likely they will take on a lingering case later, so as not to disenfranchise anyone. If they do nothing, our elections mean nothing. Almost half the states acknowledged they don't have confidence in the results. That's not a legacy the court wants.
Or....Texas' petition was obvious pseudo-legal horseshit.
Never discount the possibility that you're just wrong. Especially when the weight of evidence so strongly suggests it.
Everyone not glued to OAN or NewMaxTV saw this coming. The petition was just awful. It was so obviously flawed, so obviously outside of the scope of Texas' authority, that its outcome was inevitable.
Yet our conservative friends NEVER saw this coming. They were poleaxed and blind sided, certain that Trump was playing more '3-dimensional chess' and all his failures up to this point were merely clever positioning for him to make his final, victorious move.
.....so, yeah. They're not having a great night.
"poleaxed" I looked that up.So true. I'm a back seat driver and even I saw this coming. Good thing our imperfect court system still works.Likely they will take on a lingering case later, so as not to disenfranchise anyone. If they do nothing, our elections mean nothing. Almost half the states acknowledged they don't have confidence in the results. That's not a legacy the court wants.
Or....Texas' petition was obvious pseudo-legal horseshit.
Never discount the possibility that you're just wrong. Especially when the weight of evidence so strongly suggests it.
Everyone not glued to OAN or NewMaxTV saw this coming. The petition was just awful. It was so obviously flawed, so obviously outside of the scope of Texas' authority, that its outcome was inevitable.
Yet our conservative friends NEVER saw this coming. They were poleaxed and blind sided, certain that Trump was playing more '3-dimensional chess' and all his failures up to this point were merely clever positioning for him to make his final, victorious move.
.....so, yeah. They're not having a great night.
It's his last grifter move going out of the WH.
Trump’s post-election cash grab floods funds to new PAC
The Trump operation raised $207.5 million since Election Day, including a hefty chunk to a new leadership PAC Trump formed in November.www.politico.com
Lol do you notice how you’re quickly running out of people who you don’t call RINOs?Guns are banned. We knew that already. Fucking Democrat assholes on the bench. All nine of them. Graduated with full Democrat honors from Democrat Ivy League institutions, in good standing with the local Democrat bar association, having advanced progressive Democrat causes in court and qualified to sit on the highest bench of a Democrat institution of Democrat law.
Lol um okay. Biden will still be inaugurated on 1/20.They didn't dissent but made clear there are issues that can still be heard.