------------------------------------ yep , NO Compromise or no more infringement and work to remove existing infringements MaryAm .Yep, Gun Owners of America - "No Compromise"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
------------------------------------ yep , NO Compromise or no more infringement and work to remove existing infringements MaryAm .Yep, Gun Owners of America - "No Compromise"
Didn't the trump administration outlaw bump stocks by king trumps executive order?Any time that hateful lying Democrat asshole is pissed it is good for America.
It is illegal for the government to infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms.
Feinstein Fumes as GOA Formally Files Bump Stock Suit | Current Action Alerts
Sen. Feinstein upset about GOA’s lawsuit
Senator Feinstein Rails Against Gun Owners of America
Dear Friend:
Gun Owners of America today filed its lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s illegal and unconstitutional bump stock ban.
GOA's action came on the same day the administration published the regulations in the Federal Register.
Already, gun control advocates have become very dispirited.
Senator Dianne Feinstein lamented that the lawsuit by Gun Owners of America would keep the bump stock ban “tied up in court for years.”
Well, well. Wouldn’t that just be a shame. LOL
Anyway, Gun Owners of America has filed its lawsuit in the Western District of Michigan. You can read it here.
------------------------------------ every American has the RIGHT to the same Arms issued to the Individual American Combat Soldier BDadthats simple,,,
the 2nd meant the government has no say in either the militia or infringing on private ownership
discussion over
That is why everyone has access to grenades, nuclear weapons, and homebuilt combat ready F-16 fighters. Wait, maybe there are limits to the second amendment.
discussion not over
trulyand some people are fools WAddict !!
Just as many on the Right call for a reinterpretation of the Fourteenth, to eliminate Anchor Baby status...
So, too, should those on the Left call for a reinterpretation of the Second, to better "regulate" our "militia" -at-large...
To my way of thinking, both are declarations of rights, rather than grants or favors.------------------------------- NO , not in my opinion as the 2nd is an Original RIGHT . The 14th and all Amendments after the 10th are just favors or Grants or permission from the Government Kondor .Just as many on the Right call for a reinterpretation of the Fourteenth, to eliminate Anchor Baby status...
So, too, should those on the Left call for a reinterpretation of the Second, to better "regulate" our "militia" -at-large...
I have no power to do so.Just as many on the Right call for a reinterpretation of the Fourteenth, to eliminate Anchor Baby status...
So, too, should those on the Left call for a reinterpretation of the Second, to better "regulate" our "militia" -at-large...
Then call for it. Who's stopping you? What do you suppose the decision would be with the Supreme Court we have now?
The Fourteenth is silent on the matter.the original intent was NOT anchor babies.Just as many on the Right call for a reinterpretation of the Fourteenth, to eliminate Anchor Baby status...
So, too, should those on the Left call for a reinterpretation of the Second, to better "regulate" our "militia" -at-large...
go read.
go read about original intent. its available.The Fourteenth is silent on the matter.the original intent was NOT anchor babies.Just as many on the Right call for a reinterpretation of the Fourteenth, to eliminate Anchor Baby status...
So, too, should those on the Left call for a reinterpretation of the Second, to better "regulate" our "militia" -at-large...
go read.
It was interpretation of the Fourteenth which gave us Anchor Babies as de facto citizens.
Interpretation.
Which occurs whenever original intent is questioned, and the matter is considered by the Supreme Court.
I have no power to do so.Just as many on the Right call for a reinterpretation of the Fourteenth, to eliminate Anchor Baby status...
So, too, should those on the Left call for a reinterpretation of the Second, to better "regulate" our "militia" -at-large...
Then call for it. Who's stopping you? What do you suppose the decision would be with the Supreme Court we have now?
As to the Supreme Court, that's a very good question.
The thing about a lifetime appointment is... once you're "in", you don't have to worry about partisan politics any longer.
We routinely see our now-conservative-leaning SCOTUS serving-up surprisingly contrary decisions... swing-votes and all that, eh?
It will take someone with far more power and legal skills than I possess, to bring-on that challenge.
And, you're right, it might very well face an uphill battle in any SCOTUS hearing.
Yet, the challenge will come, and if not now, sometime soon (as history measures time), as more thousands of innocent Americans die.
That does not, in the meantime, prevent ordinary American citizens from advocating for such an effort - as we see here.