Osomir
VIP Member
Under a state without tyranny of the majority, slavery reigned supreme. Also, to address your other point, anarchism assumes the capitalist modes of production are already set up, along with a educated society that has already industrialized.
1.) We don't have slavery in such a state anymore because of constitutionalism and our Bill of Rights which we can update as needed. Anarchy doesn't have that security for minorities. It is far more arbitrary and in the moment based (once again emotive discourse over reason). We have seen this happen time and again in areas without effective state control.
2.) Why can't your society (if it works so well) build a means of production and education on its own? If you need capitalism to get started doesn't that rather point to a heavy flaw in your system? and if we need capitalistic development in order to get to your end product then why are you so opposed to capitalistic style development in developing countries?