Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
How did you arrive at TSI being 5% less than today?
Excellent question!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How did you arrive at TSI being 5% less than today?
How did you arrive at TSI being 5% less than today?
How did you arrive at TSI being 5% less than today?
You're unaware that stars get hotter over their life cycle? Billy's "solar physicist" pals apparently are. They fail at the basics too, just like Billy. But then, that's because they're also just internet cranks.
550 million years ago, 7000 ppm CO2 created normal temps.
650 million years ago, low CO2 levels created snowball earth.
Billy's fudgy nonsense fails completely at explaining that. Lower TSI and the greenhouse effects of CO2 explain it perfectly.
How did you arrive at TSI being 5% less than today?
You're unaware that stars get hotter over their life cycle? Billy's "solar physicist" pals apparently are. They fail at the basics too, just like Billy. But then, that's because they're also just internet cranks.
550 million years ago, 7000 ppm CO2 created normal temps.
650 million years ago, low CO2 levels created snowball earth.
Billy's fudgy nonsense fails completely at explaining that. Lower TSI and the greenhouse effects of CO2 explain it perfectly.
Lab Work Matters as Dr Tim Ball points out In his latest OPed.
"From the start, Richard Lindzen, former professor of meteorology at MIT, said about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis: The consensus was reached before the research had even begun. The IPCC virtually ignored evidence that showed the hypothesis wrong, including failed predictions. Instead of revisiting their science, they moved the goal posts from global warming to climate change and recently climate disruption. Mainstream media have aided and abetted them with misleading and often completely scientifically incorrect stories. These are usually a reflection of their political bias.
A recent example appeared from the BBC, triggered by more evidence that contradicts the hypothesis, that human produced CO2 is almost the sole cause of global warming. The egregious example is the BBC report on the first images from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO-2). See also Anthony Watts’ report from the AGU."
It seems shoddy reporting and outrageous claims, about the new CO2 sensing satellite, unsupported by facts have brought the AGW meme some unwanted attention and proof they lied.
Source