harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,021
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #61
even MORE impressive evidence you post..please stop....there's so much I can't keep upConsidering that I'm dealing with what is most likely a high school student who may have taken a little high school history then read a revisionist book and thinks he's now an expert...........impressive evidence [ hahahaha ] you have there = crapsee post # 47Typically military thinking follows previous wars and as rightwinger said no one on our side expected a carrier attack, carrier use and tactics were still in their infancy and our Navy was still stuck on battleship war tactics. The Japanese attack on Pearl opened everyone's eyes.they had ''peacetime'' mindset--after a war warning --after Taranto
.....--I remember reading in the mid 80's about how the Israelis defended against airplanes used as weapons ......but then after 9-11, many professionals never even thought of it ---well, I knew about them in the mid 80's as an mere E2 in the military....the professionals should've been thinking about that--just as Short and Kimmel should have known about Taranto = and know Pearl was vulnerable
.....yes--'''typical''/mediocre/''ignorant''/slow/wrong/ etc military thinking ---to mediocre military men