MtnBiker
Senior Member
hylandrdet said:Yet Kerry's vote count broke the record for the most votes ever casted for a losing candidate!
So what you are saying is Kerry is the biggest loser in history?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hylandrdet said:Yet Kerry's vote count broke the record for the most votes ever casted for a losing candidate!
acludem said:I'm a Democrat and personally I'd prefer to see a midwesterner like Evan Bayh, Russ Feingold, or Tom Vilsack get the nomination. The idea of a moderate, midwestern Democrat at the top of ticket scares the hell out of Republicans. Rudy Giuliani will not win the GOP nomination because he's a New York liberal. He's pro-choice, pro-gay rights, and moderate on gun issues, all things that don't sit well with your buddies at Focus on the Family, the Christian Coaltion, and the other far-right groups that own and operate the GOP.
As for whether or not Kerry committed Treason, who cares. He didn't win the presidency, he's back in the Senate, and it's up to the people of Massachussets whether to keep him there.
acludem
This post has a preface:
In order to save time, I would like to note for the record other lefties equally disgusted me yesterday. Namely the bloated, drunkard Ted Kennedy, Ron Reagan Jr. (god almighty, what a disgrace to the namesake of a true saint of democracy), the life-sized weeble known as Oliver Willis, the Democratic Underground and just about every other douchebag who has refused and still refuses to see the joy in someone else's success. Also, all the demented folks who refuse to see that the US presence in Iraq isn't an occupation, a quest for oil, but rather is and always has been a war on terror, tyranny, and a liberation of the Iraqi people. My advice to those suffering from brain-rot? Just shut up. Watch. Learn.
Anyone with an IQ higher than my cat was teary eyed seeing our military's YEARS of work, actually working for the Iraqis. There are no two ways about it.
We don't vote when it rains. Or if it's a bad hair day. Or if the car is low on gas, and it's late and the polling place is a whole 3 miles away. And it's dark. Or too early. Or we are too busy having lunch, or the dog needs to go to the vet to get its nails clipped.
Those 8 million Iraqi people faced death to vote.
The only people working against the Iraqis seem to be the Saddam leftovers, parts of Europe, the UN and American media and Democrats.
Anyone with a heart was proud of the coalition...it's easy to do good things for your own country. It's much, much harder to sacrifice for another country. And our beauteous military along with a coalition of many, many countries did just that.
Yes, the world will benefit too -- even the liberals who opposed this will benefit and would rather die than admit it.
But for those of us who love America, the beauty and payoff was seeing the joy (of those who previously had to vote for Saddam or face his assassins) vote yesterday for what they believed. Without fear.
Here at the compound, I've been celebrating. My life-sized Dick Cheney doll was pulled from its undisclosed location for the occasion....so some random, unedited thoughts follow.
- I hope Ted Kennedy marinated his crow in jack daniels, vodka and rum. Preferably all three. (Maybe Steve H. can make a sore-loser liberal crow cookbook for the mentally ill and perpetually drunk). Ted can smoke his alcohol soaked crow in crashed-car exhaust before eating.
- That long faced presidential loser on Meet the Press, (my favorite Sunday morning program) made me nauseous. And this was initially the topic of my post...but I have digressed...
John Kerry made me nauseous -- for the future of democracy.
His party is named after what we live and breathe here in the United States and yet the guy who could have been president (if the majority of the US bought into Michael Moore, Dan Rather and their ilk) HATES what makes us a great and free country.
John Kerry despises America, democracy and our military so much he is willing to sacrifice our security. He wants our soldiers to die for naught.
Sure, Kerry was willing to betray his Vietnam brothers. That's old news. But the man who wanted to be Commander in Chief has publicly downplayed our current military's efforts and their successes one too many times.
Luckily I had Meet the Press on DVR and didn't have to face that fiction-writer first thing in the morning.
While watching it in small bits, I couldn't help but think fiction writing would be the ideal profession for John Kerry. He spins tall tales as easily as he finds rich women to marry.
Revisionist history writer.
Fantasy political fiction.
I won the election before I lost it.
How to marry an Heiress.
Elections aren't democracy. Unless the majority votes Democrat.
Or, quite simply -- I'm a liar and sore-loser.
If god-forbid, he had been elected on November 2nd, Kerry would be talking about the great success of Iraqi elections. All based, of course on what happened in the last few years under GWB.
But that was not to be.
Instead Kerry (last year's news) had a redux on Meet the Press about the Cambodia incident, which is SEARED, seared in his memory.
Now of course we the reasonable people on the right think, "Russert, why didn't you ask these questions back in July or August? Why didn't you call him on his fiction then?"
I am kind on Tim Russert. The liberal host doesn't wear a halo but is okay in my book, he's pretty tough on everyone. That puts him miles above the likes of Dan Rather and the other weasels.
Kerry once again makes his "lucky hat" reappear from his seared ass -- this hat came from a CIA operative during their trip into Cambodia in 1968, 1969, in never-never-land or maybe at the river bordering Jackson's Neverland Ranch.
According to Kerry's spokesperson, this memory was mixed up with another memory.
That memory was ALSO seared in his memory, onto another seared memory onto yet another memory that he threw in his hope chest before he found Terry Kerry.
After downplaying the Iraqis' great moment in history, Kerry claimed that the Cambodian incident in which his boat was shot at by the Khmer Rouge (to Kerry, Khmer Rouge is a fancy French red wine) was confused with another top secret trip wherein he delivered WEAPONS to the Khmer Rouge.
Make sense?
If so you may be a Democrat (and I can try to find you a good therapist to help).
The KR didn't really exist in 1968. Or 1969. Except in John Grisham novels and John Kerry's smoked memory.
"Where is my mythical hat? Why didn't I wear it during election night?"
I hated to even talk about this, but Kerry making light of what happened in Iraq yesterday -- he deserves a very hard spanking.
About 8 million smacks on the ass.
acludem said:I'm a Democrat and personally I'd prefer to see a midwesterner like Evan Bayh, Russ Feingold, or Tom Vilsack get the nomination. The idea of a moderate, midwestern Democrat at the top of ticket scares the hell out of Republicans. Rudy Giuliani will not win the GOP nomination because he's a New York liberal. He's pro-choice, pro-gay rights, and moderate on gun issues, all things that don't sit well with your buddies at Focus on the Family, the Christian Coaltion, and the other far-right groups that own and operate the GOP.
As for whether or not Kerry committed Treason, who cares. He didn't win the presidency, he's back in the Senate, and it's up to the people of Massachussets whether to keep him there.
acludem
hylandrdet said:Acludem, as much as I like your choices, I prefer to stick with Kerry.
The GOP is out of bullets with their so called "success" of the Iraqi election; they must now hope that GW's domestic policies can keep the momentum going thorugh 2008. Just one problem...What domestic policies?
Avatar4321 said:I think the more appropriate question is what Domestic policies do the Democrats have?
Just about anyone else who runs ... including any other Democrat. Remember Al Gore??? Strange, no one else does either.hylandrdet said:...
Seriously, who's going to beat John Kerry in 2008?
hylandrdet said:I'm just a student from history. GW was an incumbent, during a wartime situation; if you do your research, you'll find that the odds of beating such an incumbent are almost impossible. Yet Kerry's vote count broke the record for the most votes ever casted for a losing candidate! America want him in, just not right now!
acludem said:As for whether or not Kerry committed Treason, who cares. He didn't win the presidency, he's back in the Senate, and it's up to the people of Massachussets whether to keep him there.
acludem