Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
If during war time, what happens as protest goes out over the internet and endangers what is viewed as national security, we will have an argument being made before the courts. Until then, there is no argument being made by anyone that I know of (with credibility) that the Koran burner was not entitled to burn his book, even with the inevitability of it being shown all over the world through the medium on the internet, print, broadcast, et al.
1) We only have free speech in peace? 2) Though there is ample court precedence to back that theory, I really don't think it will fly in this day and age.
1) Why the question? The question is a challenge to the premise. 2) Though there is evidence that you acknowledge the factual basis of the premise, you still challenge it.
This sir is what I responded to, but you in your interwed/talk radio bullshit style of speaking, which you confuse for rational debate or reasonable argument, have jumped on taking apart your own statement which in your puny mind allowed you to straddle the fence on the issue.
Sir, I deconstructed that fence before you ever got comfortable on it. You are now and forever, the USMB Official Idiot.
yours always in search of a non puny mind
Dante, internet troll with style
That is because, if you look at history, you will see that during the Vietnam War all of those precedents were either ignored, or overturned. That is why I can say that, in this day and age it is not going to fly. Maybe if you got your head out of your ass you would be able to comprehend that things have changed.
Yet, somehow, I am the one who has trouble grasping reality. Since I no longer take you seriously, unless you can prove to everyone that you are not a troll who never really takes a position, I can point out your complete idiocy and laugh.