See: Supreme Court Rejects Challenge on ‘One Person One Vote’ ”Justice Ginsburg sided with the first theory. “Nonvoters have an important stake in many policy debates — children, their parents, even their grandparents, for example, have a stake in a strong public-education system — and in receiving constituent services, such as help navigating public-benefits bureaucracies,” she wrote in her majority opinion. “By ensuring that each representative is subject to requests and suggestions from the same number of constituents, total population apportionment promotes equitable and effective representation.” Ginsburg, as well as big government folk and socialists, support one man one vote when it comes to dolling out federal revenue as shown above, but they ignore that part of the Constitution commanding one vote one dollar which is also part of the rule of apportionment. The very purpose of the rule of apportionment was to insure representation with a proportional financial obligation, or, one man one vote and one vote on dollar. I wonder why Senator Cruz promotes a tax reform plan which ignores the rule of apportionment and supports Justice Ginsburg’s thinking. JWK To support John Kasich, Hillary Clinton or Paul Ryan, is to support ourGlobal Governance Crowdand their WTO, NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA, all used to circumvent America First trade policies, while fattening the fortunes of international corporate giants who have no allegiance to America or any nation.