Judicial Activism vs Interpretation

[Contumacious]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.


It was the intent of the Founding Fathers that the US be a Constitutional Republic where the rights of the individual were basic and fundamental - how do WE THE PEOPLE force the judges not to transgress upon INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS? The rights to LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY and TO PURSUE HAPPINESS.


.


.

 

[Skylar]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.

Who says that the cases were decided based on personal views and not the constitution?

 

[Contumacious]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.

Who says that the cases were decided based on personal views and not the constitution?

IN ORDER TO KEEP THE ARGUMENT HONEST YOU SHOULD BEGIN YOUR POSTS BY ADMITTING TO BEING A PARASITE WHO WILL FIND THAT ANY RULING THAT BENEFITS YOU IS A "JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION".

.

 

[Skylar]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.

Who says that the cases were decided based on personal views and not the constitution?

IN ORDER TO KEEP THE ARGUMENT HONEST YOU SHOULD BEGIN YOUR POSTS BY ADMITTING TO BEING A PARASITE WHO WILL FIND THAT ANY RULING THAT BENEFITS YOU IS A "JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION".

.

So in order for your argument to work......everyone has to agree that you're already right?

You don't handle questions well at all, do you?

 

[S.J.]

The left has spent over 200 years looking for weak spots in the Constitution, chipping away at it's foundation in every way possible. The SC is one of their favorite ways to get what they want, as is blackmail. Clinton used FBI files to intimidate his opponents, Obama uses the IRS, FDR stacked the court with socialists as do ALL Democrats when they get the chance. Everything is fair to them if it achieves their objective, whether it's ethical or not. The only thing that matters is whether or not they can get away with it. Let's face it, the Constitution does not have enough safeguards to protect it from subversion from the left and they've made tremendous progress in dismantling it. They've exploited every negative human trait, greed, laziness, envy, etc. to garner votes and support without regard to the future of our country or the very things that have set us apart from the rest of the world. Our republic is being systematically destroyed as we sit around discussing Caitlin Jenner and other equally important issues.

 

[Contumacious]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.

Who says that the cases were decided based on personal views and not the constitution?

IN ORDER TO KEEP THE ARGUMENT HONEST YOU SHOULD BEGIN YOUR POSTS BY ADMITTING TO BEING A PARASITE WHO WILL FIND THAT ANY RULING THAT BENEFITS YOU IS A "JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION".

.

So in order for your argument to work......everyone has to agree that you're already right?

You don't handle questions well at all, do you?

NO, THEY HAVE TO AGREE THAT THE US IS A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC WHERE THE ****** INDIVIDUAL******* RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY AND TO PURSUE HAPPINESS ARE SUPREME.


.

 

[Contumacious]

The left has spent over 200 years looking for weak spots in the Constitution, chipping away at it's foundation in every way possible. The SC is one of their favorite ways to get what they want, as is blackmail. Clinton used FBI files to intimidate his opponents, Obama uses the IRS, FDR stacked the court with socialists as do ALL Democrats when they get the chance. Everything is fair to them if it achieves their objective, whether it's ethical or not. The only thing that matters is whether or not they can get away with it. Let's face it, the Constitution does not have enough safeguards to protect it from subversion from the left and they've made tremendous progress in dismantling it. They've exploited every negative human trait, greed, laziness, envy, etc. to garner votes and support without regard to the future of our country or the very things that have set us apart from the rest of the world. Our republic is being systematically destroyed as we sit around discussing Caitlin Jenner and other equally important issues.

FASCISTS DO NOT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT WEAK SPOTS- THEY DON'T MIND USING FIREARMS TO FORCE OBAMA CARE ON US.

SCUMBAG ROBERTS KNOWS THAT HIS FASCISTIC RULING WILL BE CONSIDERED THE LAW OF THE LAND.


HE KNOWS THAT THE CONTINUING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE HAS A MASSIVE DOMESTIC ARMY WILLING AND ABLE TO FORCE US TO COMPLY.

.

 

[Skylar]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.

Who says that the cases were decided based on personal views and not the constitution?

IN ORDER TO KEEP THE ARGUMENT HONEST YOU SHOULD BEGIN YOUR POSTS BY ADMITTING TO BEING A PARASITE WHO WILL FIND THAT ANY RULING THAT BENEFITS YOU IS A "JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION".

.

So in order for your argument to work......everyone has to agree that you're already right?

You don't handle questions well at all, do you?

NO, THEY HAVE TO AGREE THAT THE US IS A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC WHERE THE ****** INDIVIDUAL******* RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY AND TO PURSUE HAPPINESS ARE SUPREME.


.

And individual rights were defended today against the oppressive power of the State.

See how this works?

 

[S.J.]

The left has spent over 200 years looking for weak spots in the Constitution, chipping away at it's foundation in every way possible. The SC is one of their favorite ways to get what they want, as is blackmail. Clinton used FBI files to intimidate his opponents, Obama uses the IRS, FDR stacked the court with socialists as do ALL Democrats when they get the chance. Everything is fair to them if it achieves their objective, whether it's ethical or not. The only thing that matters is whether or not they can get away with it. Let's face it, the Constitution does not have enough safeguards to protect it from subversion from the left and they've made tremendous progress in dismantling it. They've exploited every negative human trait, greed, laziness, envy, etc. to garner votes and support without regard to the future of our country or the very things that have set us apart from the rest of the world. Our republic is being systematically destroyed as we sit around discussing Caitlin Jenner and other equally important issues.

FASCISTS DO NOT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT WEAK SPOTS- THEY DON'T MIND USING FIREARMS TO FORCE OBAMA CARE ON US.

SCUMBAG ROBERTS KNOWS THAT HIS FASCISTIC RULING WILL BE CONSIDERED THE LAW OF THE LAND.


HE KNOWS THAT THE CONTINUING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE HAS A MASSIVE DOMESTIC ARMY WILLING AND ABLE TO FORCE US TO COMPLY.

.

We're not quite to the point of all-out violent tyranny yet but we're rapidly approaching it. They want to disarm as many of us as possible before they start shooting.

 

[Skylar]

The left has spent over 200 years looking for weak spots in the Constitution, chipping away at it's foundation in every way possible. The SC is one of their favorite ways to get what they want, as is blackmail. Clinton used FBI files to intimidate his opponents, Obama uses the IRS, FDR stacked the court with socialists as do ALL Democrats when they get the chance. Everything is fair to them if it achieves their objective, whether it's ethical or not. The only thing that matters is whether or not they can get away with it. Let's face it, the Constitution does not have enough safeguards to protect it from subversion from the left and they've made tremendous progress in dismantling it. They've exploited every negative human trait, greed, laziness, envy, etc. to garner votes and support without regard to the future of our country or the very things that have set us apart from the rest of the world. Our republic is being systematically destroyed as we sit around discussing Caitlin Jenner and other equally important issues.

FASCISTS DO NOT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT WEAK SPOTS- THEY DON'T MIND USING FIREARMS TO FORCE OBAMA CARE ON US.

SCUMBAG ROBERTS KNOWS THAT HIS FASCISTIC RULING WILL BE CONSIDERED THE LAW OF THE LAND.


HE KNOWS THAT THE CONTINUING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE HAS A MASSIVE DOMESTIC ARMY WILLING AND ABLE TO FORCE US TO COMPLY.

.

We're not quite to the point of all-out violent tyranny yet but we're rapidly approaching it. They want to disarm as many of us as possible before they start shooting.

Ah, vague and thuggish threats of violence. Followed immediately by chickenshit excuses why you won't be fighting.

You're in excellent company. As most of your ilk have the same excuses why its always someone *else* that should be fighting and bleeding.

 

[S.J.]

The left has spent over 200 years looking for weak spots in the Constitution, chipping away at it's foundation in every way possible. The SC is one of their favorite ways to get what they want, as is blackmail. Clinton used FBI files to intimidate his opponents, Obama uses the IRS, FDR stacked the court with socialists as do ALL Democrats when they get the chance. Everything is fair to them if it achieves their objective, whether it's ethical or not. The only thing that matters is whether or not they can get away with it. Let's face it, the Constitution does not have enough safeguards to protect it from subversion from the left and they've made tremendous progress in dismantling it. They've exploited every negative human trait, greed, laziness, envy, etc. to garner votes and support without regard to the future of our country or the very things that have set us apart from the rest of the world. Our republic is being systematically destroyed as we sit around discussing Caitlin Jenner and other equally important issues.

FASCISTS DO NOT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT WEAK SPOTS- THEY DON'T MIND USING FIREARMS TO FORCE OBAMA CARE ON US.

SCUMBAG ROBERTS KNOWS THAT HIS FASCISTIC RULING WILL BE CONSIDERED THE LAW OF THE LAND.


HE KNOWS THAT THE CONTINUING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE HAS A MASSIVE DOMESTIC ARMY WILLING AND ABLE TO FORCE US TO COMPLY.

.

We're not quite to the point of all-out violent tyranny yet but we're rapidly approaching it. They want to disarm as many of us as possible before they start shooting.

Ah, vague and thuggish threats of violence. Followed immediately by chickenshit excuses why you won't be fighting.

You're in excellent company. As most of your ilk have the same excuses why its always someone *else* that should be fighting and bleeding.

You have a vivid imagination to get that out of my comment, but then again, dishonesty and diversion is your primary tactic.

 

[Skylar]

The left has spent over 200 years looking for weak spots in the Constitution, chipping away at it's foundation in every way possible. The SC is one of their favorite ways to get what they want, as is blackmail. Clinton used FBI files to intimidate his opponents, Obama uses the IRS, FDR stacked the court with socialists as do ALL Democrats when they get the chance. Everything is fair to them if it achieves their objective, whether it's ethical or not. The only thing that matters is whether or not they can get away with it. Let's face it, the Constitution does not have enough safeguards to protect it from subversion from the left and they've made tremendous progress in dismantling it. They've exploited every negative human trait, greed, laziness, envy, etc. to garner votes and support without regard to the future of our country or the very things that have set us apart from the rest of the world. Our republic is being systematically destroyed as we sit around discussing Caitlin Jenner and other equally important issues.

FASCISTS DO NOT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT WEAK SPOTS- THEY DON'T MIND USING FIREARMS TO FORCE OBAMA CARE ON US.

SCUMBAG ROBERTS KNOWS THAT HIS FASCISTIC RULING WILL BE CONSIDERED THE LAW OF THE LAND.


HE KNOWS THAT THE CONTINUING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE HAS A MASSIVE DOMESTIC ARMY WILLING AND ABLE TO FORCE US TO COMPLY.

.

We're not quite to the point of all-out violent tyranny yet but we're rapidly approaching it. They want to disarm as many of us as possible before they start shooting.

Ah, vague and thuggish threats of violence. Followed immediately by chickenshit excuses why you won't be fighting.

You're in excellent company. As most of your ilk have the same excuses why its always someone *else* that should be fighting and bleeding.

You have a vivid imagination to get that out of my comment, but then again, dishonesty and diversion is your primary tactic.

So when you referred to 'shooting', you were making reference to cameras? And 'disarm' was removing people's limbs?

Or were you referring to guns and killing people?

 

[bendog]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.


It was the intent of the Founding Fathers that the US be a Constitutional Republic where the rights of the individual were basic and fundamental - how do WE THE PEOPLE force the judges not to transgress upon INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS? The rights to LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY and TO PURSUE HAPPINESS.


.


.

Well, that's an unintentional fail of an OP. If you think Roberts and Kennedy think Obamacare is a good thing, you are an idiot. LOL

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.

Who says that the cases were decided based on personal views and not the constitution?

Read the opinions, they are not based in law... the law is passion free, these opinions speak of intimacy & feelings..... total hogwash.

 

[Skylar]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.

Who says that the cases were decided based on personal views and not the constitution?

Read the opinions, they are not based in law... the law is passion free, these opinions speak of intimacy & feelings..... total hogwash.

I have. The ACA ruling was based on the legislative intent of the law. And Obergefell was a predictable outcome of existing legal precedent. Where marriage is a right. And gays are protected under the Equal Protection Clause.

That you disagree with a ruling doesn't make it invalid.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The definition of 'judicial activism':

A court decision that RWnuts don't like.

 

[Contumacious]

The left has spent over 200 years looking for weak spots in the Constitution, chipping away at it's foundation in every way possible. The SC is one of their favorite ways to get what they want, as is blackmail. Clinton used FBI files to intimidate his opponents, Obama uses the IRS, FDR stacked the court with socialists as do ALL Democrats when they get the chance. Everything is fair to them if it achieves their objective, whether it's ethical or not. The only thing that matters is whether or not they can get away with it. Let's face it, the Constitution does not have enough safeguards to protect it from subversion from the left and they've made tremendous progress in dismantling it. They've exploited every negative human trait, greed, laziness, envy, etc. to garner votes and support without regard to the future of our country or the very things that have set us apart from the rest of the world. Our republic is being systematically destroyed as we sit around discussing Caitlin Jenner and other equally important issues.

FASCISTS DO NOT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT WEAK SPOTS- THEY DON'T MIND USING FIREARMS TO FORCE OBAMA CARE ON US.

SCUMBAG ROBERTS KNOWS THAT HIS FASCISTIC RULING WILL BE CONSIDERED THE LAW OF THE LAND.


HE KNOWS THAT THE CONTINUING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE HAS A MASSIVE DOMESTIC ARMY WILLING AND ABLE TO FORCE US TO COMPLY.

.

We're not quite to the point of all-out violent tyranny yet but we're rapidly approaching it. They want to disarm as many of us as possible before they start shooting.

Ah, vague and thuggish threats of violence. Followed immediately by chickenshit excuses why you won't be fighting.

You're in excellent company. As most of your ilk have the same excuses why its always someone *else* that should be fighting and bleeding.

YOUR ILK HAS CONCLUDED THAT THE GARGANTUAN WELFARE STATE HAS AT ITS DISPOSAL A MASSIVE DOMESTIC PARAMILITARY FORCE HENCE THE CONSTITUTION CAN BE "INTERPRETED" IN ANY WAY THEY WANT TO SINCE MIGHT IS RIGHT.

.

 

[Contumacious]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.

Who says that the cases were decided based on personal views and not the constitution?

IN ORDER TO KEEP THE ARGUMENT HONEST YOU SHOULD BEGIN YOUR POSTS BY ADMITTING TO BEING A PARASITE WHO WILL FIND THAT ANY RULING THAT BENEFITS YOU IS A "JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION".

.

So in order for your argument to work......everyone has to agree that you're already right?

You don't handle questions well at all, do you?

NO, THEY HAVE TO AGREE THAT THE US IS A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC WHERE THE ****** INDIVIDUAL******* RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY AND TO PURSUE HAPPINESS ARE SUPREME.


.

And individual rights were defended today against the oppressive power of the State.

See how this works?

PURE COINCIDENCE - NOT BECAUSE THE COURT IS COMMITED TO THE MAXIM THAT INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS ARE SUPREME - OTHERWISE IT WOULD NOT FORCE ME AND MINE TO PARTICIPATE IN SOCIALIZED MEDICINE SCHEMES.


.

 

[Contumacious]

The Answer to Judicial Tyranny


Judicial activism, after all, is the practice of judges ignoring the law and deciding cases based on their personal political views. With the federal judiciary focused more on legislating social policy than upholding the rule of law, Americans find themselves increasingly governed by men they did not elect and cannot remove from office.

********

How do WE THE PEOPLE force judges to decide cases based upon the Constitution and not on their personal views.

Who says that the cases were decided based on personal views and not the constitution?

Read the opinions, they are not based in law... the law is passion free, these opinions speak of intimacy & feelings..... total hogwash.

I have. The ACA ruling was based on the legislative intent of the law. And Obergefell was a predictable outcome of existing legal precedent. Where marriage is a right. And gays are protected under the Equal Protection Clause.

That you disagree with a ruling doesn't make it invalid.

SHUT THE FUCK UP

IF ****** INDIVIDUAL******* RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY AND TO PURSUE HAPPINESS ARE SUPREME THEN THE ACA RULING HAS NOT SUPPORT IN OUR CONSTITUTION (1787).

.

 

[Contumacious]

The definition of 'judicial activism':

A court decision that RWnuts don't like.

THE DEFINITION OF JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION:

ANY JUDICIAL RULING THAT AGGRANDIZES AND EMPOWERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND ASSIST THE PARASITES>