Judge tells republican party NO again

[Truthmatters]

Republicans lose appeal on poll-watching tactics


The Republican National Committee on Thursday lost a bid to dissolve a decades-old legal agreement with the Democratic National Committee over the GOP's use of improper election tactics.

The agreement dates to 1982, when the Republican National Committee settled a lawsuit brought by the Democratic National Committee accusing the GOP of trying to intimidate minority voters. Under the agreement, the Republican National Committee must obtain court approval before implementing certain poll-monitoring activities in minority precincts.

our judicial system has found your party guilty over and over.

 

[Ernie S.]

on what basis do you claim this is not true?

I've answered that in discussion of the article as a whole. The part you quote here is apparently true, but given your reputation, forgive me if I doubt EVERYTHING you post.

thank you for admitting you have NO facts on your side

Perhaps you can point out where I have been other than factual.
Coming from you this should be good.

 

[syrenn]

this thread is not about the black panthers is it?

why were the black panthers there armed as security? why were they asking for ID?

Who told them to be there?

 

[WillowTree]

Republicans lose appeal on poll-watching tactics


The Republican National Committee on Thursday lost a bid to dissolve a decades-old legal agreement with the Democratic National Committee over the GOP's use of improper election tactics.

The agreement dates to 1982, when the Republican National Committee settled a lawsuit brought by the Democratic National Committee accusing the GOP of trying to intimidate minority voters. Under the agreement, the Republican National Committee must obtain court approval before implementing certain poll-monitoring activities in minority precincts.

our judicial system has found your party guilty over and over.

why were the black panthers there armed as security? why were they asking for ID?

 

[PoliticalChic]

why do you ignore the republican court cases as they pile up?

Race-neutral enforcement of civil rights law is a principle nearly all Americans agree with. Equality before the law has been cherished since the founding, and a bloody Civil War sacrificed generations of treasure and life to enshrine race equality into constitutional law. Two obvious examples of the Obama administration’s hostility toward race-neutral enforcement of the civil rights laws:

a. The Department recently filed a brief supporting the use of race-based preferences at the University of Texas. Holder’s DOJ wants Texas to be able to give extra admissions credit to the skin color of certain college applicants. Of course some races won’t get the benefit of these racial preferences, while the political allies of the administration will.

b. In New Haven, Connecticut, the Holder Justice Department took the side of those who wanted to racially discriminate against white and Hispanic firefighters seeking promotion. Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court rejected the position of the Civil Rights Division. (It is no accident, incidentally, that senior Department attorney Steven Rosenbaum was involved in the formation of the Department’s racially biased approach in New Haven, just as he was involved in the dismissal of the New Black Panther case when he was acting deputy assistant attorney general, a political position in the Civil Rights Division.)

 

[WillowTree]

this thread is not about the black panthers is it?

why were the black panthers there armed as security? why were they asking for ID?

Who told them to be there?

Who did not remove them?

 

[Truthmatters]

you just keep ignoring the cases

 

[The T]

this thread is not about the black panthers is it?

it's about voter fraud...funny you won't address the issue of the NBPP's presence at that polling place, and Holder's refusal to prosecute thier intimidation tactics.

 

[Truthmatters]

Republicans lose appeal on poll-watching tactics


The Republican National Committee on Thursday lost a bid to dissolve a decades-old legal agreement with the Democratic National Committee over the GOP's use of improper election tactics.

The agreement dates to 1982, when the Republican National Committee settled a lawsuit brought by the Democratic National Committee accusing the GOP of trying to intimidate minority voters. Under the agreement, the Republican National Committee must obtain court approval before implementing certain poll-monitoring activities in minority precincts.

why do you pretend this is not the subject of this thread?

 

[WillowTree]

you just keep ignoring the cases

why were the black panthers there armed as security? why were they asking for ID?

 

[Truthmatters]

this thread is not about the black panthers is it?

it's about voter fraud...funny you won't address the issue of the NBPP's presence at that polling place, and Holder's refusal to prosecute thier intimidation tactics.

who came forward in the case to say they were kept from voting?

 

[WillowTree]

Republicans lose appeal on poll-watching tactics


The Republican National Committee on Thursday lost a bid to dissolve a decades-old legal agreement with the Democratic National Committee over the GOP's use of improper election tactics.

The agreement dates to 1982, when the Republican National Committee settled a lawsuit brought by the Democratic National Committee accusing the GOP of trying to intimidate minority voters. Under the agreement, the Republican National Committee must obtain court approval before implementing certain poll-monitoring activities in minority precincts.

why do you pretend this is not the subject of this thread?

why were the black panthers there armed as security? why were they asking for ID?

 

[WillowTree]

this thread is not about the black panthers is it?

it's about voter fraud...funny you won't address the issue of the NBPP's presence at that polling place, and Holder's refusal to prosecute thier intimidation tactics.

who came forward in the case to say they were kept from voting?

why were the black panthers there armed as security? why were they asking for ID?

 

[Rat in the Hat]

you just keep ignoring the cases

You keep ignoring that the Midwest political director is not the very top of the Republican Party. Or anywhere close to the top.

 

[Truthmatters]

The republican party was slapped by the judicial system of this country YET again.


None of you will adress that fact will you?

 

[WillowTree]

The republican party was slapped by the judicial system of this country YET again.


None of you will adress thqat fact will you?

why were the black panthers there armed as security? why were they asking for ID?

 

[PoliticalChic]

He never charged the dems with anything did he?

damn.. black men keeping other black men from voting......



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU]"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly - YouTube[/ame]

hahahahahahaha

everyone arround the polling station shows NO fear.

the guys talk politely with the media and you pretend its some big case.



your party is commiting suicide

Not true, Ms. Truthie...

Bartle Bull accuses the Obama Administration of corruption in handling the Philadelphia Black Panthers charges of Voter Intimidation in the November 2008 case that was dismissed by Steve Rosenbaum & Loretta King, both political appointees working in the Obama Administration. A lifelong Democrat, and having worked in the Carter Administration, he says he supported McCain because he believes Obama is a "hustler."

He speaks here:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sDoYYQdGOA]Bartle Bull reacts to former DOJ attorney on Black Panther case "Obama is a hustler".mp4 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[The T]

this thread is not about the black panthers is it?

it's about voter fraud...funny you won't address the issue of the NBPP's presence at that polling place, and Holder's refusal to prosecute thier intimidation tactics.

who came forward in the case to say they were kept from voting?

Why were they there and under who's banner? Who sent them?

 

[Rat in the Hat]

this thread is not about the black panthers is it?

it's about voter fraud...funny you won't address the issue of the NBPP's presence at that polling place, and Holder's refusal to prosecute thier intimidation tactics.

who came forward in the case to say they were kept from voting?

Adolf Hitler.







Godwin-ed!




Thread over.

 

[syrenn]

The republican party was slapped by the judicial system of this country YET again.


None of you will adress that fact will you?

Voter intimation.... fact.




[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU]"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly - YouTube[/ame]